State sees ‘significant risk’ in Vermont Yankee sale

Vermont Yankee 2010

The Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon.

VERNON – State officials are expressing serious doubts about the proposed sale of Vermont Yankee, contending that the deal “raises numerous, thus-far-unanalyzed health, safety and environmental concerns.”

Those concerns surfaced in documents filed this week by the Vermont Public Service Department and the attorney general’s office. The state agencies want to intervene in the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s review of the idled plant’s license transfer, and they’re requesting the NRC hold a hearing on the matter.

State officials previously have expressed skepticism about certain aspects of Entergy’s plan to sell the former nuclear plant to NorthStar Group Services for decommissioning. But the new documents detail numerous financial and environmental questions the agencies believe must be addressed before the Vernon property changes hands.

Foremost among those is whether NorthStar will have the money to complete the cleanup properly.

“There is a significant risk that, if approved, the sale of Vermont Yankee to NorthStar will lead to a shortfall in the amount of funding available to fully and safely decommission and radiologically decontaminate Vermont Yankee and manage its spent nuclear fuel,” Bill Irwin, of the Vermont Department of Health, wrote in the state’s filings.

Irwin

Bill Irwin, of the Vermont Department of Health. File photo by Mike Faher/VTDigger

“This would place public health, safety and the environment at risk,” Irwin added.

NorthStar spokesman Anthony Iarrapino on Thursday said the company’s attorneys still are reviewing the state’s filings and will file a response, but he had no further comment.

After stopping power production at Vermont Yankee in December 2014, Entergy wants to sell the plant to NorthStar by the end of next year. The New York-based buyer has pledged to speed decommissioning by decades and to make most of the site available for redevelopment by 2030.

Both the NRC and the Vermont Public Service Board would need to approve the transaction.

Entergy and NorthStar in February asked the NRC to approve the Vermont Yankee license transfer. Late last month, NRC staffers traveled to Brattleboro to answer questions and take public comment on the issue.

But the state attorney general and Public Service Department aren’t content to let the NRC take it from here.

In a motion filed Tuesday with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board – an independent judicial body of the NRC – the state agencies argue that NorthStar’s plan is incomplete and flawed.

“In general, the state supports moving into immediate decommissioning and restoring the Vermont Yankee site as soon as possible,” officials wrote. “The state does not, however, believe that such a transaction should be structured to create a significant risk that a new entity begins decommissioning and then runs out of money.”

Financial concerns dominate the state’s filings.

NorthStar has touted its detailed decommissioning planning, with company Chief Executive Officer Scott State saying the job has been divided into more than 900 components, each with its own budget. NorthStar has promised that any cost overruns will come out of the company’s coffers, not the plant’s decommissioning trust fund.

But the state agencies list eight scenarios in which the company could see “significant, unaccounted for” expenses. Those include “discovery of previously unknown radiological or nonradiological contamination”; a radiological incident at Vermont Yankee; and complications with long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel.

The latter topic continues to be a sore spot for the state, which argues – contrary to NRC rulings – that the Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust fund should not be used for managing spent fuel.

State officials also say there have been major cost overruns at other nuclear decommissioning jobs including those at Connecticut Yankee, Maine Yankee and Yankee Rowe in Massachusetts.

Vermont Yankee

Vermont Yankee spent fuel pad. Photo courtesy of Vermont Yankee

“The nature of a decommissioning cost estimate is that it is precisely that – an estimate,” state officials wrote. “It is not a guarantee. It is reasonably foreseeable that an estimate will turn out to be wrong.”

NorthStar has said there is a contingency built into the Vermont Yankee job in case of unforeseen expenses. The company also has offered a $125 million “support agreement” as a backup.

In the new filings, however, state officials say they aren’t confident such a support agreement will be available or sufficient to cover decommissioning expenses.

The state also is concerned that the corporate entities set up to own and operate Vermont Yankee won’t have assets beyond the decommissioning trust fund and the property itself.

“This raises a significant risk that the owner and operator could at some point have liabilities that outstrip its assets and could therefore choose to file for bankruptcy before site cleanup is complete,” officials wrote.

Such a scenario “could leave the state hosting a partially dismantled industrial site contaminated with radiological and nonradiological hazardous waste,” the state’s filing says.

In addition to the financial arguments, officials contend that NorthStar’s plans require a thorough environmental review that the NRC has not yet undertaken.

Federal law mandates “an environmental impact statement, with a full list and analysis of alternatives, before the NRC can approve of the proposed license transfer and amendment and the significant shift in decommissioning methods that NorthStar proposes,” the state says.

At this point, the NRC is not required to allow the state to intervene in its review or to grant the state a hearing.

NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan said the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will consider Vermont’s requests via a three-judge panel. That panel “will need to determine that the state has standing and that at least one of its contentions merits further scrutiny,” Sheehan said.

Mike Faher

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Tim Vincent

    What goes around comes around.
    People, and politicians, who insist that we run an economy on solar, wind and pixy dust AGAIN find themselves in conflict with common sense.
    VT Yankee could have been updated and provided CLEAN power for a long time.

  • Robert Lehmert

    The numbers are very large and the population very small,and the timeframe is very long. Thank you to all watching out for our interests.

  • Lester French

    Who’s to say that Entergy won’t go belly up and fail to complete the decommission?

  • Gary Dickinson

    Perhaps we could be reminded why the VY taxes were reduced considering that there was still fuel present on site. Seems that keeping the taxes the same until every gram of fuel was removed might have been an incentive to clean it up faster and provide funding for oversight.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State sees ‘significant risk’ in Vermont Yankee sale"