Energy & Environment

Campbell delays energy bill, passage uncertain

A last-minute squabble over siting requirements for solar and wind projects has delayed action on a major renewable energy bill.

The delay could jeopardize passage of H.40 this session. More amendments are pending tomorrow before the final Senate floor vote on Friday. There is no guarantee the House would concur and the bill would make the finish line for adjournment.

Senate President Pro Tempore John Campbell speaks on the Senate floor Thursday. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

Senate President Pro Tempore John Campbell speaks on the Senate floor Thursday. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

The renewable energy bill, H.40, puts the state on track to generate and sell more renewable electricity in Vermont. The Shumlin administration says the bill is needed this year to avoid a potential spike in electric rates in 2017.

The bill includes statewide solar setbacks, local screening requirements and automatic party status for towns to participate in the Section 248 permit process.

Towns and residents have raised concerns that the statewide setbacks will still give municipalities little say in the energy project permitting process.

Developers and environmental advocates say municipal siting measures could have unintended consequences that could slow progress on reducing the state’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Senate President Pro Tempore John Campbell is sympathetic to the towns, and he moved to scuttle debate on the bill Thursday.

Campbell, D-Windsor, said he pushed an amendment to give municipalities more authority because he was disappointed that the Public Service Department did not present any changes to the state’s renewable energy siting policy.

VTDigger is underwritten by:

“They failed to have anything in that bill that deals with the rights of towns and municipalities,” he said.

Observers are not surprised the Senate has yet to agree on a siting proposal for renewable energy.

The House spent weeks on the issue, but never finalized siting restrictions. Rep. Robin Chesnut-Tangerman, P-Middletown Springs, who serves on the House Natural Resources and Energy Committee, wanted to change the energy siting process and worked on a bill in committee.

“We took a look at what seemed like simple fixes, but when we followed them along, they were not so simple anymore,” he said.

The Senate floor delay makes passage of the bill uncertain. Even if the House concurs with the substance of the bill, at least three-quarters of the House must vote to suspend the rules in order to take it up on Saturday, the day the Legislature is planning to adjourn.

House Republican leadership has not indicated they will seek to block the bill. House Minority Leader Don Turner, R-Milton, said he is not sure the bill is a “must pass” this year. But he said he still needs to discuss it with his caucus.

If the bill doesn’t pass, rates could increase in 2017 by 6 percent statewide, the Department of Public Service says. That’s because Vermont’s current renewable energy incentive program, known as SPEED, allows utilities to sell renewable energy credits out of state and also count them toward a state goal, which begins in 2017. This is considered to be “double counting,” and as a result, other power companies may no longer purchase Vermont’s credits. That would leave Vermont utilities at a loss of revenue equal to a 6 percent rate increase.

“It is important for this bill to pass this year to provide certainty in the market. Without this bill there is no certainty,” said Robert Dostis, director of government affairs for Green Mountain Power, the state’s largest utility.

Campbell blocks reporters from committee meeting

Campbell held a private meeting Thursday with the entire Senate Natural Resources Committee to discuss a siting proposal in his office. Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington, legislative council, and Campbell’s staff were also present.

Campbell asked two reporters who attempted to attend the closed-door meeting to leave the room.

“There is no question that there is an open-door policy within the Statehouse, but that does not include the legislative leadership offices. This is a private office. It’s not a committee room,” Campbell said.

The Vermont Constitution says the doors of the Statehouse must be open, except when “welfare of the State may require them to be shut.”

John Bloomer, secretary of the Senate, oversees procedure in the Senate. He said the Vermont Constitution does not prohibit closed-door meeting unless there is a vote. Open meeting law does not apply to the Legislature, he said. It refers to the Vermont Constitution.

“Then you kind of work with what’s custom and tradition,” he said.

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Lawmakers frequently meet in private with leadership or Gov. Peter Shumlin.

“You’re asking me if there is something that makes it right. I’m saying that there is nothing that makes it wrong,” Bloomer said.

Sen. Chris Bray, D-Addison, chair of the Natural Resources and Energy committee, said he can understand why the press wanted to cover the meeting, but he also understands that lawmakers want to discuss issues in private before going public.

Don't miss a thing. Sign up here to get VTDigger's weekly email on the energy industry and the environment.

 

John Herrick

About John

John Herrick joined VTDigger in June 2013 as an intern working on the searchable campaign finance database and is now VTDigger's energy and environment reporter. He graduated from the University of Vermont with a bachelor’s degree in political science and a minor in Spanish. He wrote for the Vermont Cynic, university’s student newspaper, before interning and later freelancing for the Burlington Free Press.

Email: [email protected]

Follow John on Twitter @herrickjohnny

Send us your thoughts

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.

 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Campbell delays energy bill, passage uncertain"