Public Service Board officer recommends backup generator permit for Vermont Yankee

Almost two weeks before Entergy Corp. and the state of Vermont are set to meet in federal court, a Public Service Board officer recommended giving the owner of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant what it wants: a permit for a backup generator.

Vermont Yankee on the banks of the Connecticut River

Vermont Yankee on the banks of the Connecticut River

On June 4, Entergy is set to argue in U.S. District Court that the state of Vermont is federally preempted from barring the company’s application to construct a backup diesel generator at Vermont Yankee.

But, in a turn of events, the hearing officer overseeing the application proposed to the board on Monday that it provide the state permit, known as a certificate of public good.

To comply with federal regulations, the nuclear plant must have an emergency source of power, in case of a station blackout. The plant’s contract for that power is set to expire on Sept. 1; TransCanada, the owner of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station, is not renewing the contract.

Entergy filed the lawsuit because, the company indicated, it was under the impression that the quasi-judicial Public Service Board would not issue a permit to begin construction in a timely fashion. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires a backup generator for blackout situations, and Entergy argued that the state is federally preempted under two counts of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution by the power vested in the commission under the Congressional Atomic Energy Act.

Entergy asked the federal court to intervene, so that Vermont Yankee could begin constructing a generator for the site by June 11.

In a separate case, the board is considering whether to issue a new state permit for the plant to operate for another 20 years. Leading up to this proceeding, the board also denied Entergy’s motion to amend its previous sale order, dry fuel storage order and certificate of public good.

In an April letter sent to Entergy, the board’s hearing officer, Lars Bang-Jensen, questioned whether “the Board can and should grant permission for Entergy VY to install the generator when Entergy VY is not in compliance with existing Orders and (permits) and has not demonstrated that it is willing to comply with Orders of this Board.”

On Monday, Bang-Jensen concluded, “The Board can and should grant permission.”

Chris Recchia, commissioner of the Department of Public Service, says his department supports Vermont Yankee’s application for a backup generator.

“This has no relationship to the overall CPG for operation of the facility; it’s specific to the back-up generator, and we think they’ve done what they need to do,” he said.

Vermont Yankee spokesman Jim Sinclair said that his company is encouraged by Bang-Jensen’s proposal, but is waiting for the final word.

“While we appreciate and agree with the hearing officer’s recommendation, we remain uncertain as to when the Board will rule,” he said. “Therefore, we will have to determine how this may affect the federal court hearing.”

The first hearing in the federal court case is still scheduled for June 4 at 10 a.m. in Burlington U.S. District Courtroom 251. Comments on Bang-Jensen’s proposal are due by May 28.

 

 

Andrew Stein

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Public Service Board officer recommends backup generator permit for Vermont Yankee"

1000

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Mike Kerin
3 years 6 months ago

How can it be for the public good to have Entergy store more than they were supposed to of the nuclear waste?

sandra bettis
3 years 6 months ago

what is going on?? aren’t we past this stupid arguement?? shut it down and get it over with!!!!!!!!!! give it death with(out) dignity!!!!!!!

Pete Novick
3 years 6 months ago
This article is a little misleading as it doesn’t accurately describe the current situation. Quoted from the article above: “To comply with federal regulations, the nuclear plant must have an emergency source of power, in case of a station blackout. The plant’s contract for that power is set to expire on Sept. 1; TransCanada, the owner of the Vernon Hydroelectric Station, is not renewing the contract.” As reported in the Rutland Herald (10/27/12), it is changes to ISO New England’s blackstart plan that prompted Entergy to have to find another source for the NRC-required blackstart requirement: “The changes to ISO… Read more »
wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Public Service Board officer recommends backup generator permit for V..."