In what appears to be their sole gun control bill of this year, Vermont lawmakers are taking aim at an elusive target: ghost guns.

The term refers to firearms that are either assembled from separately purchased parts, or by 3D printing, instead of being purchased through a licensed gun manufacturer or dealer. That means these fully functional firearms lack serial numbers, rendering them untraceable, and theyโ€™re obtainable outside of state and federal background check processes and waiting periods.

S.209, passed by the Vermont Senate this week, seeks to close what Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden Central, called a loophole in Vermontโ€™s existing universal background check laws. 

โ€œI wish I could say that they truly were universal, but they weren’t,โ€ Baruth, the primary sponsor of S.209 and a longtime gun control advocate, said on the Senate floor Wednesday.

Universal background checks were implemented in Vermont in 2018 as part of a sweeping gun control package signed by Republican Gov. Phil Scott shortly after the Parkland, Florida, school shooting, and after Vermontโ€™s own close call when a Fair Haven teen wrote of his aspirations to carry out a similar act.

Over the intervening years, the Legislature has passed additional bills to patch up loopholes to Vermontโ€™s background check system โ€” such as the gun show and Charleston loopholes, Baruth said.

Enter S.209, which, according to Baruth, would close a loophole โ€œproduced by technology.โ€

โ€œYou can buy a 3D printer now, take it home and produce a gun in your basement that evades the entire background check system,โ€ Baruth said. โ€œYou can also over the internet buy a kit called a โ€˜buy, build, shoot kit,โ€™ which is all the pieces of a weapon, and you can bring it down into your basement, screw in a couple of things, make a couple of adjustments, and you have a fully functional weapon that also does not necessarily go through the background check system.โ€

S.209 would not render those self-assembled weapons illegal. But it would mandate that, once a 3D-printed or built gun is operable, its owner takes the weapon to a licensed firearm dealer, who would then affix a serial number to the gun and conduct a background check of its owner before giving it back. The bill also would establish stiffer penalties for anyone who commits a felony in Vermont while in possession of a ghost gun.

Those additional penalties are something the Vermont Federation of Sportsmenโ€™s Club could โ€œtacitly support,โ€ according to testimony provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee from the federationโ€™s president Chris Bradley in January.

But S.209โ€™s approach, in Bradleyโ€™s estimation, would establish โ€œunenforceable laws that would significantly impact and hurt law-abiding citizens through loss of time and money.โ€ Further, Bradley said, โ€œprivately made firearmsโ€ are legal under federal law, and are not required to have serial numbers.

Gun control advocates see it differently. Referring to ghost guns as โ€œone of the fastest growing safety problems we face today,โ€ Moms Demand Actionโ€™s Vermont chapter celebrated S.209โ€™s passage in a written statement issued Wednesday.

โ€œNobody in Vermont should be able to get their hands on a gun without a background check, and all guns should be traceable, and the passage of todayโ€™s bill moves us one step closer to making this a reality,โ€ Pat Byrd, a volunteer with the Vermont chapter, said in the statement. 

The Senate in a preliminary vote Wednesday advanced the bill by a 26-3 tripartisan vote, then offered its final blessing by a voice vote Thursday. The bill now heads to the House; if it prevails there, it will head to Scottโ€™s desk.

Asked about the bill at a press conference Wednesday afternoon, Scott replied that, โ€œPutting a serial number on a gun that is produced at home seems to make sense, but the devil’s always in the details.โ€

The governor questioned the burden the bill could place on gun dealers, adding, โ€œSo I have some concerns about it, but in principle, I’m not opposed to it. It’s just the details that might be problematic.โ€

Previously VTDigger's statehouse bureau chief.