Diane Blodgett opens mail-in ballot envelopes at a polling place at the Barre City Auditorium in August 2020. Lt. Gov. Molly Gray in Thursday’s candidate debate pushed for mail-in voting for the primary. Senate President Pro Tempore Becca Balint says this is Gray’s “newfound passion.” File photo by Mike Dougherty/VTDigger

During Wednesday nightโ€™s Democratic congressional candidate debate (co-moderated by yours truly, full disclosure), Senate President Pro Tempore Becca Balint, D-Windham, posed to Lt. Gov. Molly Gray a question only a former teacher would ask: What is a mistake you have made, and how did you make it right?

โ€œI think itโ€™s not unknown to Vermonters that there was a period in my life, Becca, where I was not a consistent voter, and that was a mistake,โ€ Gray replied, referring to a six-year gap in her voting record between 2010 and 2016 (including the 2016 presidential election).

To make it right, Gray said, sheโ€™s made it a priority to implement universal vote-by-mail in Vermontโ€™s elections in hopes of increasing voter access and turnout.

And then Gray challenged Balint: โ€œMy concern is that we are, what, a month out from the end of the legislative session. There still isnโ€™t vote-by-mail for this primary. Weโ€™re still in a global pandemic. So my question and my concern is: What are you going to do, commit to tonight, to make sure that Vermonters have access to vote-by-mail in August?โ€

In a statement Thursday morning from the Office of the Lieutenant Governor, Gray doubled down.

โ€œWe need to ensure Vermonters have every tool to safely participate in the August 2022 Primary,โ€ she said. โ€œThe legislature has my full support in taking steps to fully authorize and fund vote-by-mail for the August 2022 Primary.โ€

Hereโ€™s the thing: Secretary of State Jim Condos doesnโ€™t want that.

In an interview Thursday afternoon, Condos explained that when a Vermont voter requests an absentee ballot for the primary election (which they can still do this year, and have been able to do for decades), they are sent three ballots: Democratic, Republican and Progressive. 

From there, they need to fill out one of the three ballots, and mail back all three (two of them blank) for tabulation. Itโ€™s a different, more complicated vote-by-mail process that ultimately leads to the highest mail-in ballot rejection rate of all elections in the state due to voter mistakes, Condos said.

Mail-in primary ballots also happen to be much more expensive than the single ballots sent to voters in general elections.

โ€œTo make a long story short: Weโ€™re not ready for putting in place universal vote-by-mail for the primary,โ€ Condos said.

What was different in the leadup to the 2020 primary was that the Secretary of Stateโ€™s Office mailed postcards to registered, active voters instructing them how to request their absentee primary ballots. The postcard included a tear-off ballot request form with prepaid postage.

Those postcards were paid for using federal CARES Act pandemic relief dollars. Asked if his office had requested funding from the Legislature this year for similar postcards, Condos said, โ€œNo, because we really didnโ€™t think we were going to need to do it.โ€

After Grayโ€™s comments, he wants to set the record straight with Vermont voters, but thereโ€™s limited time before Aug. 9. His office hopes to determine by early next week whether itโ€™s even possible to send out mailers with absentee ballot instructions in time.

โ€œI just want to reiterate that what weโ€™re doing for the primary is the same for 2020 and the same for the past 25 years,โ€ Condos said.

Asked Thursday afternoon whether she has made specific bill recommendations for the August primaries this legislative session, Grayโ€™s spokesperson Andrew Gillespie said the lieutenant governor is โ€œadvocating for that in her public statements.โ€

Last year, when the Legislature passed a bill establishing universal vote-by-mail for general elections, Gray said in a statement at the time that she โ€œlook(ed) forward to working with Vermont policymakers and our Congressional delegation to further expand the vote-by-mail process to all elections.โ€

However, Balint said in a Thursday afternoon statement that she had not heard from Gray on the issue of universal vote-by-mail for the August primary.

โ€œI share the goal that Vermont will continue to do all we can to make it easier for people to vote. I appreciate the Lieutenant Governorโ€™s newfound passion on this issue,โ€ Balint said. โ€œThat being said, prior to last night at a campaign event, I have received no communications from her about passing further legislation or appropriating funds for the August primary, neither during debate of S.15 last year, nor at any point this session.โ€

โ€” Sarah Mearhoff


IN THE KNOW

Vermont hospitals have received more than $301 million in state and federal aid since the coronavirus pandemic began in 2020, according to new data from the Vermont Agency of Human Services.

The data reflects money from three sources:

  • The largest chunk โ€” $184 million โ€” came from direct payouts from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for Covid-19 care, vaccinations and testing. 
  • Eight of the stateโ€™s 14 nonprofit hospitals also got a collective $105 million in one-time grants from the state. 
  • Eight hospitals got more than $12 million from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to handle the health care staffing crisis. 

The vast majority of that taxpayer money โ€” roughly 60% โ€” went to the University of Vermont Health Network, the largest hospital operator in the state. Thatโ€™s almost $180 million to three hospitals: University of Vermont Medical Center in Burlington, Central Vermont Medical Center in Berlin and Porter Hospital in Middlebury. 

The hospitals in Burlington and Berlin recently got the green light from state regulators to raise prices of services midyear after network leaders argued the one-time federal payouts canโ€™t make up for ongoing inflation and personnel costs. 

Read more here. 

โ€” Liora Engel-Smith

The Senate plans to shrink the Houseโ€™s proposed child tax credit โ€” potentially by more than half โ€” to include other kinds of credits in its version of a tax relief package. 

The House tax relief proposal, passed in February as H.510, would return $1,200 to families for each child 6 and under, affecting an estimated 34,000 Vermonters. It would also expand the Social Security tax exemption. In total, it would reduce state revenue by an estimated $49.7 million, with $48 million due to the child tax credit. 

A competing proposal came from Gov. Phil Scott: smaller tax refunds, but to more Vermonters, not just families with young children. 

The governorโ€™s proposal would exempt all interest paid on student loans, increase the Earned Income Tax Credit for low- and moderate-income Vermonters, exempt military pensions and send flat $1,000 credits to nurses and child care workers.

Based on committee discussions from the past two days, it seems the Senate Finance Committee is trying to land somewhere in the middle: โ€œmeaningfulโ€ credits to families, as Sen. Ruth Hardy, D-Addison, said to the committee, while extending some relief beyond just families with young children.

โ€œI think we all agree with the concept of any child tax credit not being a silly little one, but sticking to the Houseโ€™s construct of if youโ€™re gonna do it, really do it,โ€ said Sen. Chris Pearson, P/D-Chittenden, to the committee on Thursday. 

Read more here. 

โ€” Riley Robinson

I heard there was a Statehouse shoe-dunnit yesterday: Rep. Jim Masland, D-Thetford, sent out an all-members email that he had dropped a shoe in the parking lot, and it was on the lam. 

On the same day, Graham Campbell, an analyst at the Joint Fiscal Office, looked out a window of the Pink Lady to see someone climbing out of a dumpster. 

โ€œWe looked closer and it was Representative Jim Masland,โ€ Campbell said. โ€œAnd so we were like, โ€˜What the heck is he doing?โ€™ And we thought he’d lost his keys or thrown his keys out.โ€

Since weโ€™re here to ask the tough questions, and do real shoe-leather reporting, I had to ask if Masland found the footwear after all. He did, he wrote in an email, but wouldnโ€™t confirm whether it ended up in the aforementioned dumpster. 

โ€” Riley Robinson


ON THE MOVE

The House Committee on General, Housing and Military Affairs made changes to two Senate bills aimed at increasing the supply of affordable housing in Vermont. 

The committee voted 7-2 to support S.210, but not before tweaking the legislation to make more landlords eligible for grants and loans to bring housing up to code or to build new units.

Lawmakers also shrunk the Senate versionโ€™s $5 million for additional dwelling units to $1 million. That funding would help educate homeowners with designing, financing, permitting and building accessory dwelling units.

In a straw poll vote of 7-2, the House committee decided to keep a rental property registry, a provision that Gov. Phil Scott has called a โ€œpoison pill.โ€ Scott vetoed a rental registry last year and recently insisted that the legislature split it from bills funding new housing.

The committee also made changes to S.226, which provides subsidies to builders when it costs more to build a home than it will appraise for. House lawmakers created an option for builders to, when selling a property, pass the subsidy on to a nonprofit that will preserve the homeโ€™s affordability.

โ€” Fred Thys

A bill to amend Vermontโ€™s medical-aid-in-dying law passed the House Thursday afternoon. 

Vermontโ€™s legislature was the first to legalize medical-aid-in-dying in 2013. The law allows someone with a terminal illness to request a prescription to end their life. 

The bill, S.74, would allow patients to request the medication via telemedicine, and it would eliminate the final 48-hour waiting period before a patient can receive the prescription. Advocates have said these changes are important to make medical-aid-in-dying accessible, especially as advanced illness can make it painful and difficult for patients to drive for hours to see their prescribing physician in-person. 

On the House floor yesterday, Rep. Anne Donahue, R-Northfield, said she was concerned that eliminating all in-person interaction would increase the risk of abuse. Her amendment would have required one in-person interaction with any health care worker โ€” possibly a home health aid, physical therapist or nurse โ€” who could confirm to a physician that the patient is โ€œnot in a coercive or abusive situation,โ€ Donahue said. 

The House Human Services Committee disagreed with the proposal by a vote of 8-3, said Rep. Anne Pugh, D-South Burlington, who presented the bill on the floor on Wednesday. 

The House defeated Donahueโ€™s amendment, with 98 โ€œnoโ€ votes and just 41 โ€œyeas.โ€ 

Gov. Phil Scottโ€™s office declined to state his position on the bill Thursday afternoon. 

โ€œThe Governor hasnโ€™t had the opportunity to review the legislation yet,โ€ wrote Scottโ€™s spokesperson Jason Maulucci. โ€œHe will evaluate it once it is delivered and we receive input through our standard bill review process.โ€

โ€” Riley Robinson


WHATโ€™S FOR LUNCH

Seafood is the star of the show for Friday: The chefโ€™s special will be fettuccine and clams, per Statehouse chef Bryant Palmer. The grill will have fried fish sandwiches and the deli line will have a Mediterranean tuna salad wrap.

โ€” Riley Robinson


WHAT WEโ€™RE READING

Pair of employee lawsuits seek compensation for back pay at Vail Resorts๏ฟผ (VTDigger)

Stenger sentenced to 18 months in prison for role in EB-5 fraud (VTDigger) In Starksboro, Marijke’s Perennial Gardens Plus Spreads Passion for Native Plants (Seven Days)

Previously VTDigger's statehouse bureau chief.