Vernon dam incident not serious, say owner and feds

Vernon hydroelectric dam

The hydroelectric dam in Vernon. File photo by Kayla Rice/Brattleboro Reformer

The recent failure of a bulkhead at the Vernon hydroelectric station spurred an incident report to federal regulators.

The full report has not been released.

But dam owner Great River Hydro and officials at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are classifying the problem as minor.

“The incident involved a relatively small bulkhead, with the only impact a slight loss of water, and there was no danger to the public,” said Craig Cano, a commission spokesman. “A new bulkhead is being constructed, and we consider this work routine maintenance.”

Great River Hydro LLC, a subsidiary of Boston-based ArcLight Capital Partners, in April completed a $1.07 billion acquisition of 13 hydroelectric stations formerly owned by TransCanada.

The stations are on the Connecticut and Deerfield rivers and include the Vernon dam, which is more than a century old and stretches 956 feet across the Connecticut.

Great River is seeking to renew the Vernon station’s federal license.

Separate from that process, Great River in early June notified the federal commission that a wooden bulkhead had failed in Vernon.

FERC has released a short letter written by a Great River administrator. But the incident report is not available to the public because it has been labeled “critical energy infrastructure information.”

Federal law defines that as “specific engineering, vulnerability or detailed design information” that “could be useful to a person in planning an attack on critical infrastructure.” Such information is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.

Great River’s John Ragonese, the company’s FERC license manager, said hydro station owners generally are required to report any structural repairs to the federal agency. It’s not an indication of a serious issue, he said.

“This is simply a case where we identified that a wooden cover had essentially broken,” Ragonese said.

He added that the issue is “in no way endangering the dam. … It’s just something that needs to be fixed.”

Mike Faher

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Edward Letourneau

    Its a news story because this is Vermont where not enough people have jobs that keep them from thinking about important things, and allows for idle time so they can look for boogeymen everywhere.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vernon dam incident not serious, say owner and feds"