Entergy spends $125M of fund since Yankee shutdown

Vermont Yankee

Vermont Yankee as seen from the air in mid-December. Photo by Kristopher Radder/Brattleboro Reformer

VERNON – Entergy has spent nearly $125 million from Vermont Yankee’s decommissioning trust fund in the two years since the Vernon plant shut down.

Overall, with other expenses and investment income factored in, the nuclear plant’s trust fund has decreased by about 15 percent during that time – from $664.56 million to $561.6 million.

While those are big numbers, Entergy says its decommissioning spending remains under budget at this point. Joe Lynch, government affairs senior manager for Entergy Wholesale Commodities, attributed that in part to personnel management and strict adherence to decommissioning work schedules.

“Our projects have all come in at or ahead of schedule,” Lynch said.

Entergy stopped power production at Vermont Yankee at the end of 2014. Most of the funding for the plant’s eventual cleanup will come from the decommissioning trust fund, an account created by past contributions from electric ratepayers in Vermont.

While Entergy never has paid into the fund, the company has control of the account and can make decommissioning-related withdrawals under the watch of the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Vermont officials have made various attempts to intervene in trust fund matters, arguing that some of Entergy’s withdrawals – for property taxes and insurance, for instance – are improper. But the NRC has for the most part disagreed, ruling against the state’s petitions.

Also, a federal court last year dismissed a state lawsuit related to Vermont Yankee trust fund use.

Entergy has proposed selling Vermont Yankee to a New York-based decommissioning company, NorthStar Group Services Inc., by the end of 2018. If that sale happens, NorthStar will take control of the plant’s trust fund.

Until then, however, Entergy is continuing to make regular withdrawals for decommissioning-related work and day-to-day expenses at Vermont Yankee.

Recent updates submitted to the Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel show that Entergy withdrew $66.9 million from the trust fund in 2016. The fund decreased by an additional $4.6 million last year due to other expenses – mostly taxes.

On the plus side, investment income contributed $37.7 million to the fund in 2016.

When comparable numbers from 2015 are added in, Entergy’s withdrawals over two years have totaled $124.9 million; fund expenses have reached $20.6 million; and investment income has brought $42.7 million into the account.

Joe Lynch, Entergy

Joe Lynch, Entergy Vermont Yankee government affairs manager, speaks to the Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel. File photo by Mike Faher/VTDigger

The bulk of that income rolled in last year. “Clearly, 2016 was a better year for the market,” Lynch said.

Entergy’s spending has outpaced those earnings. But Lynch recently told VNDCAP members that “we’re not spending money faster than we had in our original estimate. In fact, we’re beating that two years in a row, which is obviously very good for the project.”

In an interview Friday, Lynch said lower-than-expected personnel costs have been a positive factor for the project’s bottom line.

He said Vermont Yankee staffing levels are “slightly under what we had projected to be” at this point. He also pointed out that security staffers – who now make up the majority of the workers on site – are no longer Entergy employees.

“We have contracted out the security services,” Lynch said. “And we’ve saved some money in doing so.”

Otherwise, he attributed decommissioning savings to efficiencies. Lynch said Entergy is using local labor when possible and is competitively bidding decommissioning-related work.

Entergy also has continued to close down and dismantle portions of the plant that are no longer needed. Lynch said administrators are considering the removal of other such structures including a construction office building that dates to the mid-1980s.

“It provides an opportunity to eliminate a fire protection system that requires us to heat the building,” he said. “It’s not occupied.”

Notably, Vermont Yankee administrators say an ongoing water intrusion problem in the lower levels of the plant’s turbine building has not broken the plant’s budget. Lynch said Entergy had expected to deal with water issues, while also acknowledging that “we are spending money on water management earlier than anticipated.”

He also said neither the decommissioning trust fund nor the plant’s decommissioning cost estimate is a “static number.”

The trust fund fluctuates constantly due to the interplay of withdrawals and market-related gains. And Lynch said Entergy’s original cost estimate for decommissioning and site restoration at Vermont Yankee – $1.24 billion – is often cited but can be misleading.

For one thing, that estimate didn’t rely completely on the decommissioning trust fund. Entergy, for example, is funding a $143 million fuel storage project via a line of credit.

Also, Lynch said Entergy’s site work in 2015 and 2016 has reduced the work ultimately needed to clean up the Vermont Yankee property. “We’ve made progress toward license termination over the past few years,” Lynch said.

If state and federal officials give their OK, the bulk of that job will fall to NorthStar starting in 2019.

One key provision of that deal is that there must be at least $513.5 million in the Vermont Yankee decommissioning trust fund when the sale closes. If market earnings don’t keep the fund at that level, it will be up to Entergy to make up the difference.

“There could be some top-off provided by Entergy,” NorthStar CEO Scott State said during a recent NRC meeting.

Mike Faher

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Howard Shaffer

    As I recall, Entergy was required to contribute to the Decommissioning Fund after the 2009 market fall. The fund had fallen below the NRC required minimum for the plant.

    Money could be save by pumping the basement water into the river. The money being spent to ship it offsite is only to pacify the opponents.

    • Spoon Agave

      Why are there opponents to pumping water into a river?

      • John Greenberg

        Spoon Agave:

        The water in question is radioactive.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Entergy spends $125M of fund since Yankee shutdown"