Legislative wrap: Higher fees and a few taxes - VTDigger

Legislative wrap: Higher fees and a few taxes

VTrans workers rebuilding a bridge on Route 100 between Moretown and Middlesex. VTD/Josh Larkin

Transportation Agency workers rebuild a bridge. File photo by Josh Larkin/VTDigger

Late last week, legislators put the final stamp of approval on a revenue package to support state government functions for the next fiscal year.

The three big pieces of revenue legislation — the miscellaneous tax bill, the executive branch fee bill and the transportation fee bill — together raise $47.1 million.

The executive branch fee and tax bills together raise $28.1 million for the general fund, the bulk of which comes from increases in fees. The remainder of the new revenue goes to the education fund or other special funds. (The transportation fee bill raises $10.9 million, nearly all of which goes into the transportation fund.)

By far the largest source of new general fund revenue is an increase in the initial and annual fees that mutual fund companies pay, which together are expected to raise $20.8 million.

The final package also includes an increase in the registration fee charged to broker dealer agents — from $60 to $90. That bump will bring in $3.3 million in new revenue.

The bill also includes language on the EB-5 foreign investor program, calling on Vermont’s EB-5 center to become wholly self-funded, codifying the oversight and administrative structure, and directing the state to attempt to collect fees that were suspended while projects, including at Jay Peak, were under investigation.

The tax bill raises $3.8 million for the general fund, more than half of which is a one-time bump that comes from a change in accounting procedure. The legislation switches from quarterly to monthly filing periods for bank franchises and telephone taxes.

Early in the session, opposition mounted to Gov. Peter Shumlin’s proposal to impose a 2.35 percent provider tax on some 1,200 doctors and dentists throughout the state, and lawmakers scrapped it.

The House passed a revenue package that included an increase in the employer assessment charged to businesses that do not offer health insurance for their workers, as well as an increase in a tax on bank franchises. Both of those proposals were later abandoned.

Only $1 million of the tax bill is considered ongoing revenue, but Senate Finance Committee Chair Tim Ashe, D/P-Chittenden, said it is not from a new tax. Room rentals through websites like AirBnB are supposed to be subject to rooms and meals tax, but that often goes uncollected. The bill directs the Department of Taxes to make agreements with those companies to try to tighten the net on vacation rentals.

An increase in the gross fuel receipts tax will bring in $2.9 million in new revenue for a special fund that goes to support weatherization of homes. The bill changes that tax on a variety of energy sources from 0.5 percent; coal and natural gas will increase to 0.75 percent, while electricity will remain at 0.5 percent. Meanwhile, liquid fuels such as heating oil and propane will now be taxed at a rate of 2 cents per gallon.

An increase to the ambulance provider tax is projected to raise $1.2 million. That money will go to increase the reimbursement rates that ambulance services receive for Medicaid patients.

Ashe said that in the wake of last year’s tax package, which raised $29.7 million, he and others were resistant to craft another big tax bill.

“When we passed that we said we did not want to come back again and be looking to the same sources of revenue,” he said.

In three of the four years Ashe has headed the Senate Finance Committee, the revenue package relied more on fees than new taxes, he said. Lawmakers routinely review fees from different departments of state government and increase them to keep pace with economic growth.

“Overall, I feel like the Legislature left having found ways to pay our bills that did not lean heavily on Vermonters, which I think is a good thing,” Ashe said.

Rep. Janet Ancel, D-Calais, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said lawmakers “bent over backward” to try to minimize the impact that the revenue bills would have on Vermonters and businesses.

Much of the money raised through the revenue package will be levied from large businesses that work out of state, she said, referring to the mutual fund fees.

“We’ve raised money that we needed to raise to maintain services that we have a commitment to,” Ancel said, “and we did it without impacting Vermont families and Vermont businesses for the most part.”

Elizabeth Hewitt

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • edward letourneau

    I don’t know anyone who has any faith in the thinking and integrity of state government. How come these people do not get it, and keep doing the same things every year?

    • Cheryl Ganley

      Because they keep getting re-elected year after year, so I guess they think they are doing good.

  • As Joe Biden says: “It’s patriotic to pay taxes”. Yeah, but, there has to be a limit, doesn’t there? Yes, according to our illustrious legislature we’re not near that limit yet. 100% is,the limit. Ever so slowly they are working towards that limit. Don’t worry, eventually, they will get there. We keep reflecting them, giving them the power to do so.

  • David Russo

    “An increase in the gross fuel receipts tax will bring in $2.9 million in new revenue for a special fund that goes to support weatherization of homes.”

    Haven’t we been paying extra taxes and fees to “weatherize” homes for the last 20 years? How many homes are left that haven’t been weatherized? Has anyone ever looked at these programs to see if they are effective? Was this a way to get the Carbon Tax snuck in under another name?

  • John Jacobs

    It says a lot about our policy makers that they think taking additional revenue from what is a dying product, mutual funds, is a wise choice. It is a less than brilliant idea to base more spending on that.

    The market is moving towards low fee ETF’s and away from high fee managed mutual funds that have shown to have worse returns over the long term. According to morningstar, in 2015 active managed funds (most mutual funds) saw $200B in fund outflows and passive funds (largely ETF’s) saw $400B of inflows.

    As the tax take from mutual funds decreases, the legislature will look elsewhere to patch the hole. Remember this when they act surprised when revenue from mutual fund taxes decreases over the next 5-10 years.

    • Randy Jorgensen

      I was thinking the same thing. EFT’s have been gaining traction for the past few years. As usual Vermont’s late to the game.

    • John Greenberg

      John Jacobs:
      “It says a lot about our policy makers that they think taking additional revenue from what is a dying product, mutual funds, is a wise choice.” Yeah, there are only 7923 of them left. http://www.icifactbook.org/pdf/2015_factbook_1.pdf

  • Tom Sullivan

    “Ashe said that in the wake of last year’s tax package, which raised $29.7 million, he and others were resistant to craft another big tax bill”

    Tim Ashe “the progressive” is concerned about excessive taxation, and is doing his best to resist the urge to raise taxes. But after a new senate leader is elected, it’s back to binge taxing.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Legislative wrap: Higher fees and a few taxes"