A key Vermont health care regulator reduced hospital budgets by millions of dollars for the 2025 fiscal year, setting out financial guardrails for how the facilities can operate over the next 12 months.  

The decisions, announced Friday by the Green Mountain Care Board, place caps on how much Vermont hospitals can charge for services and how much revenue they can bring in from those services. 

Earlier this year, Vermontโ€™s hospitals asked the board to sign off on a 5.7% systemwide increase in charges for patient care to private insurers, such as Blue Cross Blue Shield and MVP. Hospitals sought to raise their patient revenue โ€” money brought in from caring for patients โ€” by a total of 8%. 

But the board capped overall commercial charge growth for patient care at an increase of 3.4% or less over the current fiscal year for each hospital. And revenue from patient services can grow only 4.1% systemwide in the next fiscal year, per the boardโ€™s orders.

The decisions will take effect in hospitalsโ€™ 2025 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1. 

Owen Foster, the chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, said in an interview Monday that the boardโ€™s decisions were an attempt to balance competing concerns: affordability, access and the viability of the stateโ€™s hospitals.

โ€œThe big theme was really considering the system and what's going on in the insurance market and with people's ability to afford health care,โ€ Foster said in an interview Monday. โ€œWhile also being mindful that we're on the precipice of, potentially, some large systematic change.โ€

Earlier this year, the Green Mountain Care Board signed off on a third year of substantial increases for commercial insurance premiums โ€” a move that has added fuel to concerns about the cost of health care in the state.

That potential "systematic changeโ€ mentioned by Foster refers to a report due Wednesday by a consultant with recommendations for how Vermontโ€™s hospitals should adapt to ensure the long-term sustainability of the stateโ€™s health care system.

But Mike Del Trecco, the president and CEO of the Vermont Association of Hospitals and Health Systems, said the boardโ€™s cuts could harm health care access in the state.

โ€œWe know we live in a state where the cost of everything is high โ€” housing, property taxes, groceries, health care โ€” and we've got to work on putting pressure on those costs and bringing them down,โ€ Del Trecco said. โ€œBut we also live in a state with a very old population, and those Vermonters need more care, and frankly, it's more expensive care. And that's the balancing act we're faced with.โ€

Changes to charges for hospital services 

The care board set benchmark increases of 3.5% for patient revenue and 3.4% for hospital charges to commercial insurers, based on state health care affordability goals.

In their decisions, the board kept all hospitalsโ€™ charges for patient care within or below that 3.4% cap. 

In the case of the University of Vermont Medical Center, the stateโ€™s largest hospital, the board actually required a 1% decrease in charges in 2025 โ€” a response to the fact that, in its 2023 fiscal year, the hospital had exceeded its board-ordered patient revenue cap. The Burlington hospital had requested permission to raise prices by 6.8%. 

UVM Health Network administrators have said that that excess revenue came from treating more patients with more complex needs โ€” and that the hospital actually lost money on providing that care. 

โ€œOn Friday, the Board informed UVM Health Network that they would be penalizing the Network for providing increased care to our patients,โ€ UVM Health Network spokesperson Annie Mackin said in an emailed statement, โ€œand enforcing a cap on care by allowing commercial insurance companies to pay us less in the coming two years than they did last year, even as the costs of providing health care continue to increase.โ€

Rutland Regional Medical Center, which also exceeded its board-ordered revenue that year, will be held to a 1.2% bump in charges โ€” less than half its requested hike of 2.8%.

All other hospitals were allowed to raise prices between 2.2% and 3.4%. 

Patient revenue changes

The board-allowed increase in patient services revenue came out to 4.1% across all hospitals, but individual hospital caps varied more widely.

North Country Hospital will be allowed to grow patient revenue by 1.6%, the amount requested by the Newport hospital. Meanwhile, Morrisvilleโ€™s Copley Hospital will be allowed to raise patient revenue by 9%, and Northwestern Medical Center, in St. Albans, can raise revenue by 6.8%, the two largest adjustments in the state.

Foster, the Green Mountain Care Board chair, said that those higher revenue caps will allow the hospitals โ€” both of which are, he said, relatively affordable โ€” to treat more patients. 

โ€œCopley and Northwestern are, by Vermont standards, quite a bit more affordable for services on the commercial side,โ€ he said. โ€œAnd so we gave both of them quite a bit more than the guidance was to allow that affordable access.โ€

Hospitals are able to appeal the boardโ€™s orders on their budgets, although Del Trecco said he was unaware of any current efforts to appeal the decisions.

But University of Vermont Health Network president and CEO Sunny Eappen said in an interview last week that the network was exploring legal options to challenge the boardโ€™s orders, which he said could force hospitals to cut services.

โ€œWe will explore every possible venue to protect Vermonters in doing this work,โ€ he said. 

Previously VTDigger's government accountability and health care reporter.