Commentary

Springfield School Board: Reduced education taxes ought to be viewed as a windfall

This commentary is from Mary Krueger, a member of the Springfield, Vermont, School Board, on behalf of the entire board.

There are lots of changes homeowners will see in their property tax bills this year, which are due to be sent on or about July 15. One of those changes is a sharp reduction in the Homestead Education tax rate — the portion of the bill that funds our schools. 

This rate will be reduced by about 29.5 cents, from $1.7004 last year to $1.4050 per $100 of property value this year.

This is a huge swing historically, due to unpredictable and unprecedented economic factors in our economy. As a comparison, in 2019, the education tax rate was $1.73 per $100 of property value; in 2020, $1.74; in 2021, $1.77; and last year $1.70. 

Two things contributed to these lower education taxes: a surplus in the state Education Fund and increased home sale prices. This is not due to any changes in the per-pupil cost of education that voters passed in March. 

This year, the state found it had a surplus of money in the state Education Fund (this is where our homestead education taxes go). This was because more money from taxes (including sales and use, vehicle purchase taxes and meals and rooms taxes) was raised than needed to fund education statewide.

In May of this year, the Legislature decided how to spend that surplus of about $95 million. It is devoting $20 million to property tax relief. 

The result, which affects the “yield” factor, is a lower tax rate on property tax bills for the homestead education tax. In Springfield, we believe this will result in a reduction of 6.5 cents per $100 of property value from last year.

Increased home sale prices will also result in an additional reduction to the homestead education tax rate on homeowners’ tax bills. Home sale prices determine the common level of appraisal, or CLA, which is the last factor used to calculate the homestead education tax rate. 

The CLA compares local home sale prices to town grand list property values. If the grand list is less than sale prices, the CLA is a lower percentage; if the grand list values are more than the sale prices, the CLA is a higher percentage. The higher percentage the CLA, the lower the homestead education property tax rate (within certain limits).

This year, after Springfield’s reappraisal, as compared to fair market values (home sale prices), the CLA is 103%. This higher CLA will result in a reduction of approximately 23 cents per $100 of property value in the homestead education tax rate on property bills this year. The higher yield and higher CLA mean a total reduction of 29.54 cents in homestead education property taxes from last year.

Since the lower education tax will be applied to a higher assessed value, the best way to see the effects of all these changes is to compare the education tax amount from last year to this year. Look at the homestead education portion of your bill. 

No one could predict the massive increase in home sales or the state’s ability to refund surplus education funds on the state level to taxpayers. Neither the yield nor the CLA is tied to local education spending. These reductions in education taxes ought to be viewed as a windfall.

Per-pupil spending is always a factor used to determine our education tax rate. This factor is within our control. We hope that our voters will consider these lower 2022-23 taxes in the context of our historical rates. Otherwise, to maintain these rates, future budgets would have to cut spending on our children at a critical time post-pandemic. 

To learn more about property tax relief, go to: https://tax.vermont.gov/property/tax-credit 

To learn more about how your homestead education property tax rate is calculated go here: https://tax.vermont.gov/property/education-property-tax-rates/faqs

For more detail from your school board go here: https://www.ssdvt.org/


Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. Authors are limited to one commentary published per month from February through May; the rest of the year, the limit is two per month, space permitting. The minimum length is 400 words, and the maximum is 850 words. We require commenters to cite sources for quotations and on a case-by-case basis we ask writers to back up assertions. We do not have the resources to fact check commentaries and reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and inaccuracy. We do not publish commentaries that are endorsements of political candidates. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Tom Kearney, commentary@vtdigger.org.

Email: opinion@vtdigger.org

Send us your thoughts

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.

 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Springfield School Board: Reduced education taxes ought to be viewed ..."
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.