Commentary

Jake Ermolovich: Why I support Vermont’s Reproductive Liberty Amendment

This commentary is by Jake Ermolovich, a third-year medical student at UVM's Larner College of Medicine. These views are his, and may not reflect the views of the Larner College or UVM Health Network.

Pregnancy and the birthing process are wondrous, horrible, perfectly fallible parts of our existence. Each of us is pulled into the milieu of this world; our lungs forced open by air unfelt in the womb, our cries carried out from the ether that existed before us. 

All the trauma of being born has been part of our health care system for centuries, yet it has often gone unnoticed by those who don’t face it daily, or those who never learned its intricacies. 

During my rotation in obstetrics and gynecology, I had the privilege of seeing this process up close. From prenatal counseling to intrapartum care to postpartum follow-up — each step of the way is paved by “what could go wrongs” and songs of worry written between waves of flowing joy. 

And since each ebb levies the weight of two lives, the stakes are so much higher in this field of medicine. 

To paint a better picture, resources (user-friendly and comprehensive) are available to guide and inform on each step taken in routine prenatal care. Prior to medical school, I was honestly unaware of all the burdens taken on by child-bearers as they work toward the one monumental moment many have seen only partially in movies and media. One visit followed by another, followed by lab work, pap smears, ultrasounds, medication changes, lifestyle changes, genetic screening, infectious screening, questions leading to answers leading to more questions leading to 37 to 42 weeks of monthly, biweekly, weekly follow-up — all for the chance, if you are lucky, to bring a little you into this world. 

When one understands the risks and challenges associated with pregnancy and birth, it’s not surprising to learn that abortion is safer than childbirth. If a parent is fortunate enough to have access to the health care necessary to carry a pregnancy to term, they still face so much risk. Molar and ectopic pregnancies, eclampsia, accreta, choriocarcinoma, chorioamnionitis, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, uterine rupture — to name a few dangerous complications. 

Yet the freedom to choose — to risk a pregnancy or end one for which you’re not prepared — has been threatened. The leaked Supreme Court draft outlines as much. So, as an aspiring physician, I feel a responsibility to advocate for patient autonomy and fight back against the capricious political backdrop that has seemingly slithered its way between a person and their body. 

If you are like me and value your health and freedom, it is important to support the passage of Vermont’s Reproductive Liberty Amendment. The Reproductive Liberty Amendment  (previously Prop 5) will be a ballot measure in Vermont’s 2022 general election this November. If passed, it would protect every Vermonter’s right to make their own reproductive decisions, like whether and when to become pregnant, use temporary or permanent birth control, or seek abortion care. 

Our reproductive decisions are ours to make, without interference from politicians. That is what the amendment will accomplish. Please join me and take the pledge to vote yes on the Reproductive Liberty Amendment.


Did you know VTDigger is a nonprofit?

Our journalism is made possible by member donations. If you value what we do, please contribute and help keep this vital resource accessible to all.

Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. Authors are limited to one commentary published per month from February through May; the rest of the year, the limit is two per month, space permitting. The minimum length is 400 words, and the maximum is 850 words. We require commenters to cite sources for quotations and on a case-by-case basis we ask writers to back up assertions. We do not have the resources to fact check commentaries and reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and inaccuracy. We do not publish commentaries that are endorsements of political candidates. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Tom Kearney, [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Send us your thoughts

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.

 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Jake Ermolovich: Why I support Vermont’s Reproductive Liberty Amend..."
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.