Three ferries from the Lake Champlain Transportation Company service the crossing between Grand Isle and Plattsburgh, New York, on July 12, 2021. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The Grand Isle Development Review Board has approved Lake Champlain Transportation Co.’s plans for a new maintenance, storage and office facility near Gordons Landing, a project that drew strong opposition from some local residents.

On a 3-2 vote Sept. 22, board members gave the ferry company’s application a green light but tacked on a number of conditions on how the facility must manage hazardous materials and protect the environment, including Lake Champlain.

The company filed its proposal almost seven months ago, and the board held four meetings to review the plans.

Lake Champlain Transportation plans to build a 30,000-square-foot facility on West Shore Road near the ferry terminal that links Grand Isle and Plattsburgh, New York. The company wants to move its maintenance operations from Burlington to the new building, saying that, with staff and parts next door, repair work will be easier.

Some Grand Isle residents contend the proposal is inconsistent with local zoning laws, could contaminate the island’s drinking-water supply, and could cause noise pollution in an otherwise quiet part of town.

Laura Heaberlin, who lives next to the site, has been one of the project’s most ardent critics. 

Lake Champlain Transportation applied to build a “storage and repair” facility, Heaberlin has said, but she thought the project should be considered an “industrial” facility, which would not be allowed on that property under the town’s zoning laws.

The land is in a commercial recreation shoreline zone, which allows such uses as storage and repair, marinas, boathouses and offices.

Heaberlin has also said ferry officials’ description of the project “has a lot of word-for-word resonance with our bylaws’ definition of ‘industrial.’” 

In its decision last week, the Development Review Board stated the ferry facility would be “industrial in size and appearance” and would house “industrial equipment” such as an overhead crane and a sand-blasting bay with a dust collector.

Still, a majority of members decided the proposed use was not industrial.

“Despite the size of the building, the number of workers, and the sophisticated repair capabilities represented by the facility and personnel, the DRB considers the application to be for uses that are permitted in the commercial recreation shoreline district,” the board said.

Conditions

Members noted that Lake Champlain Transportation’s proposal involves removing “numerous mature trees” and would convert about 60% of the 3.3-acre property to impervious, heat-reflecting surfaces, including roofs and pavement.

The company must offset the carbon sequestration lost by removing those trees, the board said, by either employing renewable energy on-site, planting new vegetation or using some other method that’s approved by the town’s zoning administrative officer.

Any repairs or maintenance that produce noise or dust, or involve hazardous materials, must be done inside the building with the doors closed, the board said.

Lake Champlain Transportation must also present an annual account of its use, storage and disposal of hazardous substances to both the zoning administrative officer and the Grand Isle Consolidated Water District.

Water officials have raised concerns about hazardous materials being used at the site, which is inside the source protection area for the district’s water intake. That means groundwater likely passes through the land before traveling into the lake, where the offshore intake for the public water source is located.

In an interview, water district Chairwoman Janine Banks said the Development Review Board’s conditions did not exactly meet the district’s requests, and the district’s board is scheduled to meet Oct. 13 to further review the Sept. 22 decision.

“We’re not for or against the project,” Banks said. “We just want to make sure that the drinking water is protected.”

Lake Champlain Transportation should also do more to “buffer the proposed development from Lake Champlain and the people who use the lake,” the Development Review Board said. 

The company owns two houses on the site, at 39 and 41 West Shore Road. Officials planned to keep both houses standing and use at least one of them.

But board members decided the company should remove the house at 39 West Shore Road to reduce the overall development on the site. In its place, the board said, the company should plant new trees and shrubs to better protect the shoreline.

The board also stipulated that Lake Champlain Transportation “must prevent frequent or consistent noises” from its repair and maintenance activities that exceed 65 decibels at the property’s southern and western boundaries. It must also address issues with the planned location of an underground propane tank and present a more detailed analysis of how many parking spaces would be available.

Lake Champlain Transportation’s next step would be to accept the Development Review Board’s conditions and seek permits from the town’s zoning office, board clerk Marie Prescott wrote in an email. 

Interested parties also have 30 days to appeal the decision to state environmental court.

A Lake Champlain Transportation official did not immediately respond to VTDigger’s request for comment on the decision.

VTDigger's state government and economy reporter.