Commentary

VCNG: Attorney general should accept court’s ruling on public records

Editor’s note: This commentary was first published Jan. 9 in the newspapers of the Vermont Community Newspaper Group as an editorial, the opinion of the newspaper’s top management. Those papers are: Stowe Reporter; The Other Paper, South Burlington; Shelburne News; Waterbury Record; News & Citizen of Morrisville; and The Citizen of Charlotte and Hinesburg.

It’s outrageous that Attorney General TJ Donovan — the state government’s top lawyer — is refusing to accept a ruling by the Vermont Supreme Court.

Donovan knows full well that the Supreme Court’s ruling has the force of law.

The court ruling confirmed that people have a right to inspect public records for free, and then went further: They can make their own copies — photos or scans — without paying a fee. If you want the public agency to make copies for you, then you have to pay for those copies. But there is no charge for inspecting records, or for making your own copies or scans.

Donovan says the court is wrong. He says his office handles a lot of tricky cases and lawyers have to spend hours and hours poring through documents to make sure no secrets are improperly disclosed. He wants the people requesting those records to pay for that lawyer time.

Problem is, these are the public’s records — people have a right to easy access, so they can understand what their government is doing. An informed citizen is the key to our democracy. Is the recordkeeping so bad in Donovan’s office that public records can’t be separated from records exempt from disclosure? Vermont’s courts do it with ease, and so do most of the school, municipal and state agencies we deal with.

Fees have become a significant obstacle to reviewing Vermont’s public records. Increasingly, agencies have been charging huge fees — thousands of dollars — to cover staffing costs to prepare records for public viewing.

Exhibit A is VTDigger, which fought a lonely battle  to prove that the Jay Peak EB-5 expansion projects were a fraud. A fraud indeed: Millions of investors’ dollars were swindled, the chief architect of the scam went to jail and had to forfeit $81 million, and the federal government shut down the Vermont EB-5 Regional Center for utter incompetence. All this emerged from Digger’s reporting over a period of years, when the state fought tooth and nail to avoid handing over documents in the case. It took request after request, and heavy legal fees, for Digger to get part of what it needed.

When the facts finally started to emerge, you’d think the attorney general’s office would have smelled the rat, and investigated what happened. It didn’t. Rather, it was federal officials who pursued the details about the scandal that occurred right under the noses of Vermont’s most prominent politicians.

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Meanwhile, the state used a lawsuit filed in the case as an excuse not to disclose documents detailing how the fraud went on for a decade. Once that lawsuit was settled, Donovan still kept the records secret, because the screwed-over investors in Jay Peak had filed a suit of their own. Litigation, y’know.

Also conveniently, the case was settled before any sworn statements were taken from witnesses, so state officials involved in the EB-5 program did not have to testify under oath about their actions. Those depositions also would have become public.

And now, after years of foot-dragging, the state says some crucial records have vanished.

With that grim record involving state documents, you’d think the state’s top legal officer would try to make amends. You’d think the state government might feel a sense of shame. You’d think the state would try to restore public confidence, and make it easier for people to see what their government is doing in their name.

But, to the contrary, Donovan not only has the gall to defy the Supreme Court, but he’s lobbying the Legislature to enact fees for viewing and copying public records. 

Access to public records should not be an issue at all. They’re the public’s records, and they should be managed for the public. Most public agencies in Vermont already do it. And, since most public records are electronic, it’s easy to store them properly. All it requires is good management. If an agency’s recordkeeping is sloppy, the public shouldn’t have to pay for that incompetence.

TJ Donovan thinks that making public records readily available is somehow a diversion from the attorney general’s work. In fact, it’s part of the job.

VTDigger serves a vital role in delivering news that changes the terms of many debates. Digger reporters engage us, enlighten us and offer "real eye openers" about issues of the day.

Crea Lintilhac, VJT Board Member


Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. We have a minimum length of 400 words. We have found the ideal length is approximately 600 to 800 words. We provide some copyediting support, but we do not have the staff to fact-check commentaries. We reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and accuracy. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Cate Chant, [email protected], and Anne Galloway, [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Reader Footnotes

Please help move our stories forward with information we can use in future articles.

Readers must submit actual first and last names and email addresses in order for notes to be approved. We are no longer requiring readers to submit user names and passwords.

We have a limit of 1,000 characters. We moderate every reader note.

Notes about other readers’ points of view will not be accepted. We will only publish notes responding to the story.

For more information, please see our guidelines. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

About voting: If you see voting totals jump when you vote on comments, this indicates that other readers have been voting at the same time.
VTDigger Reader Footnotes are now closed on this story.
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "VCNG: Attorney general should accept court’s ruling on public recor..."