Business & Economy

Interest growing in Northeast Kingdom broadband district

Katherine Sims
Katherine Sims, director of the Northeast Kingdom Collaborative. Photo by Justin Trombly/VTDigger

Twenty-two towns in the Northeast Kingdom so far have signaled support for asking voters to join a communications union district, a possible solution to the region’s longtime struggle for high-speed internet.

“The idea that there is a group of local people trying to solve the problem themselves, I think it has some reassurance instead of Montpelier trying to solve the problem for them,” said organizer Evan Carlson, who works with Lyndonville’s Do North Coworking center. 

He and Katherine Sims, director of the Northeast Kingdom Collaborative, have been at the helm of the effort to bring a district to the area’s 55 municipalities. And they say the reception’s been enthusiastic so far.

“The common feeling is that selectboard members know that this is an issue that matters to their residents,” Sims said. “They might not have the capacity or expertise to move forward on their own, [so a communications union district is appealing].”

The Kingdom’s counties have some of the lowest availability of baseline broadband, or high-speed, internet in the state. Essex has the lowest rate at 21.7%, according to data from 2018. Orleans has the third-lowest at 50.6%, and Caledonia has the fourth-lowest at 51.2%. Those access problems translate into barriers for businesses and for retaining people.

A communications union district is a type of governmental body created in 2015 that allows municipalities to join together to provide broadband service. Legislation lets a district obtain municipal bonds for the task, without direct financial risk for member towns, and a few exist elsewhere in the state.

Since the summer, advocates for forming a district have been visiting selectboards to pitch the idea. 

The goal is to convince each board to place a question about joining a district on its Town Meeting Day agenda.

Most of the progress has been made in the southern half of the Kingdom. 

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Carlson said 15 towns from Caledonia County and southern Essex County have either voted to place the item on their town meeting agendas or have committed to do so: Barnet, Burke, Concord, Danville, East Haven, Groton, Kirby, Lyndon, Newark, Ryegate, Sheffield, Stannard, Sutton, Waterford and Wheelock.

One notable outlier has been St. Johnsbury, the largest town in the Kingdom.

In late August, Carlson and Rep. Scott Campbell, D-St. Johnsbury, presented the idea to officials there, but board members had questions they wanted answered before they’d consider a vote.

“I believe they are still skeptical of the potential value it’s going to provide in a town that already has decent internet penetration,” Carlson said.

In Orleans and Essex counties, Sims said, eight towns have signed on or intend to: Albany, Barton, Brighton, Craftsbury, Coventry, Glover, Hardwick and Lowell.

Evan Carlson
Evan Carlson, entrepreneur-in-residence at Do North Coworking. Photo by Justin Trombly/VTDigger

Outreach in the Kingdom’s northernmost communities has been hard. “Some of it is probably just general communication that needs to be amplified,” Carlson said. “We’re hoping that through the initial formation of the CUD, that will attract some of the towns to participate.”

Across the Kingdom, town officials have asked about the risk to taxpayers, the cost to local governments, the mechanisms for leaving the district and how soon their towns might receive broadband coverage.

“We’ve tried to be completely honest with everyone, saying out of the gate: Our goal is to fund this with grants and other types of public funds,” Carlson said. “That said, there’s a chance that we would need storage inside of different towns for different infrastructure, and that’s something that might be asked of a town.”

Carlson and Sims said the timeline for rolling out broadband won’t be clear until a district is formed and studies can be commissioned. 

The advocates said they’ll soon send out finalized language for towns to vote on for the Town Meeting Day ballots. A study is almost finished that would give organizers a better sense of how to structure the district — if they need one for the whole Kingdom, or two or three. 

“We’re not going to solve this big, expensive problem overnight,” Sims said. “But we’re really excited to feel like there’s positive momentum moving forward.”

Want to stay on top of the latest business news? Sign up here to get a weekly email on all of VTDigger's reporting on local companies and economic trends. And check out our new Business section here.


I Appreciate VTDigger

VTDigger is the most powerful investigative journalism entity in the state of Vermont. No one else covers stories with the focus and journalistic integrity of VT Digger. A blessing for transparency, the scourge of obstructionism, they are the best at what they do.

Thank you!!!

Eileen Andreoli, Winooski

Justin Trombly

Reader Footnotes

Please help move our stories forward with information we can use in future articles.

Readers must submit actual first and last names and email addresses in order for notes to be approved. We are no longer requiring readers to submit user names and passwords.

We have a limit of 1,000 characters. We moderate every reader note.

Notes about other readers’ points of view will not be accepted. We will only publish notes responding to the story.

For more information, please see our guidelines. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

About voting: If you see voting totals jump when you vote on comments, this indicates that other readers have been voting at the same time.
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Diana Osborn

I think it’s great these communities are attempting to address the broadband access problem. However, it’s sad and unfair that they have to do it at all. It’s ridiculous that the federal and state governments don’t prioritize high-speed internet in the 2000’s in the same way that electrification was addressed in the 1900’s. Sure, there’s just enough money trickling down in grants and incentives that communities are forced to compete for opportunities, but that’s kind of a red herring. Whether educatio or health care, utilities or road infrastructure, civilization demands equity and fairness. Yes, that requires the “haves” to care about the “have nots.” Now,it seems the “haves” boast of their great circumstance blindly unaware of the dire circumstances of others (forcing the disenfranchised to solve their own problems.) How can we move beyond the concept of profitability being the prime motivator for everything and into the realm of intangibles such as improved quality of life for all?

F X Flinn

St. J’s shouldn’t be hesitant. Once the district is fully built out their residents will have a second option for broadband and that competition is likely to help bring down rates. It is also likely that the district will not build in St J’s until all the surrounding unserved areas are built — that is exactly the case in Hartford, which will be the last part of ECFiber’s build because most of the town has cable. But St J’s will have a seat on the board and be fully aware of what is going on around them. Also, it’s far more likely the grants available for CUDs will go to those with the largest coherent geographies and populations. Lastly, these districts can’t obligate taxpayers in any way shape or form under state law. Full disclosure — I am Hartford’s rep to the ECFiber board. Good luck to the folks in the NEK!


Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Interest growing in Northeast Kingdom broadband district"