Editor’s note: This commentary is by Dan Jones, of Montpelier, who is a member of the Sustainable Montpelier Coalition.

[L]ike many other Northern New England cities, Montpelier has a river running through it. The Winooski was once a wild phenomenon of nature. It was cherished by the indigenous native Americans and respected for its life-giving waters. Montpelier underwent earlier levels of development and occupation that required building walls along the banks so our river was channeled to stabilize foundations for granite sheds and easy cargo loading. About a hundred years ago, the Winooski was dammed to power the local trolley.

Today, we use the shores of the Winooski for parking commuter cars. Parking lots on the old industrial foundations insure that there is not yet a place downtown to get near the water, if, for no other reason, just to simply enjoy it. If water is life, as we all know to be true, why are we squandering this precious resource?

Most โ€œsmartโ€ cities realize that their riverfront is a potential development asset. Boston is known for the Esplanade along the Charles. San Antonio has made its small local river a center of downtown nightlife. The High Line in Manhattan creates a downtown garden park with view on the Hudson. Closer to home, look what happened to Burlington when the rail yards down by the lake were transformed into a waterfront park. This leads me to ask again, why are we squandering the potentially prime asset of our riverfront?

Unfortunately, the parking lots along the river also contribute significantly to the large amount of sewage Montpelier dumps into the river during every rain event. Along the Winooski, those acres of hard pavement on the riverbank means that there is always a lot of toxic runoff rushing into our sewers and the river itself. We tend to forget that riverโ€™s natural banks and their plants can provide environmental services. They filter the rain and buffer for floods. The way we now use the riverfront, there is no chance for that run-off to be cleaned by the land and the tree roots that should be in that land. It’s time to look at the river as a crucial element in our climate-changed future.

If you drive along Route 2 stretch between Main Street and Granite Street in Montpelier, you clearly see the destruction. In midwinter, avalanches of snow, sand and salt cascade down from parking lots onto the frozen river. By early spring the snow and ice is gone, but the dust-colored ravaged banks are choked with rocks, grass and occasional weed trees. This stretch of river offers no attraction whatsoever. No wonder the idea of turning our attention towards the river has real trouble taking root. Whatever could be done, looks expensive so it’s better not to think about it.

All of those insults are just todayโ€™s challenges and donโ€™t begin to include the coming ravages from climate change. Future weather events promise to make Ireneโ€™s floods look tame. The riverfrontโ€™s former flood plains, now dedicated to farms and towns, will be incapable of providing natural protections. The โ€˜27 and โ€™92 floods give us a hint of what devastation will be in store from globally warmed rain events.

We can change these scenarios. We could choose to help mitigate and adapt to such flooding threats. Such a response will require us to view our river as both a resource and as a challenge. It’s past time to look at ways to collectively respond. Lots of research shows that upstream forested buffers can help slow down and absorb flood threats. We can stabilize the banks with appropriate plantings and resculpt them with setbacks and trees. The riverfront at Two Rivers Farm could be planted to provide flood protection.

A few years ago we created the Sustainable Montpelier Design Competition to engage designers and the citizens in what could be. The winning design along with the other four finalists incorporated a number of visions of what our downtown riverfront could become. The winning design even extended the vision all along our river. Itโ€™s time for such dreams to inform our coming actions.

We believe that a coalition of the private and public entities, dedicated to a rebirth of our river, could transform its banks to a green and welcoming landscape. This, in turn, would both immensely improve the attraction of downtown while also helping provide some protection from coming rain events. But such an effort needs to happen soon.

The simplest starting place would be to support and organize lots of manageable local efforts through key organizations like the Friends of the Winooski, the River Conservancy, the Tree Board the Conservation Commission and the new downtown master planning study. Together, as neighborhoods, schools and churches, we can build rain gardens and create demonstration projects of swales and riparian plantings for capturing stormwater running down our hillsides. We could plant trees to stabilize the riverbanks where the roots can suck up excess run-off. We can find other uses for our downtown land rather than hard surface parking lots.

Such projects will show people what is needed and what is possible. These responses wonโ€™t happen unless there is a lively and focused discussion of the priorities needed to stop neglecting our precious rivers. Itโ€™s time to reclaim them.

Pieces contributed by readers and newsmakers. VTDigger strives to publish a variety of views from a broad range of Vermonters.

4 replies on “Dan Jones: Our squandered river”