Peter Conlon
Members of the House, left, and Senate take part in a Conference Committee to discuss a proposed waiting period for mandated school district mergers on April 16. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

[T]he standoff between the House and the Senate over delaying forced school district mergers under Act 46 continues.

As promised, Senate Education chair Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden, asked his fellow Senators on Tuesday to discharge the conference committee tasked with crafting a compromise bill between the two chambers.

As passed by the Senate, H. 39 would grant up to 44 districts a one-year reprieve from mergers under Act 46. As passed by the House, the bill would give 26 districts the delay. House conferees, in their latest proposal, offered 10.

โ€œI am frankly at a loss with what to do with a conference committee that has moved not only away from us, but away from their own bill,โ€ Baruth told the Senate.

Senators agreed on a voice vote to discharge the committee and form a new one. But Baruth himself acknowledged their action could not force the Houseโ€™s hand. And House leadership has indicated little willingness to go along with Baruthโ€™s request for a new conference committee.

โ€œThe Senateโ€™s action today does not affect the House, nor the House conferees. Our appointed members await the committee chairโ€™s call for the next meeting,โ€ said Katherine Levasseur, chief of staff to House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero.

Likely anticipating the Houseโ€™s response, Baruth made one additional parliamentary maneuver โ€“ tacking the Senateโ€™s language delaying mergers on to H. 521, a bill that would delay the implementation of Act 173, a special education overhaul passed last year. That bill is up for a third reading in the Senate tomorrow.

House Education chair Kate Webb, D-Shelburne, defended the House confereesโ€™ against Baruthโ€™s charge that their offers in committee had moved away from the Houseโ€™s position on the matter.

Much has changed since the House originally passed their version of H. 39 in early February, she said, and the vast majority of districts are on the path to meeting the July 1 deadline currently in law.

โ€œThe House position has always been to reduce chaos for those communities struggling during this period of transition,โ€ she said.

And Webb suggested she might object to Senateโ€™s decision to tack Act 46 on to the special education bill on procedural grounds.

โ€œOne of the questions that I will have is: is it germane?โ€ she said.

Previously VTDigger's political reporter.

4 replies on “Senate ratchets up tension over Act 46 merger delays”