Does anybody find it curious in an age when the goal is to close prisons, Pennsylvania has opened their state prisons to take in Vermont inmates? Pennsylvania is closing some of its facilities for a number of reasons, among them a drop in population and the age and condition of the facilities. Vermont needs to find a different solution to the overcrowding problem rather than shipping our inmates to states with aging, empty facilities. The public employees of the Keystone State will be able to maintain their jobs, while Vermont public employees lose out on this deal.
Let’s not forget that there was a proposal this year to close one of our own facilities, the Windsor farm. There appears to be some creative maneuvering in place to make good use of the space, nevertheless we are shipping inmates out of state and repurposing facilities in this state.
“While out-of-state, I was warehoused, I learned nothing good, except that prison life leads to awful habits and lack of responsibility. So, Vermont inmates are being moved to Pennsylvania and we are making room for more to go there, well that news is not so good after all.”
Let us not forget, too, the transportation of the inmates from Baldwin, Michigan, to Pennsylvania. There was a report by Grassroots Leadership in conjunction with Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform in 2013, in which an inmate describes the transportation process: “John, (who preferred we did not use his real name) was transferred to a private prison in Kentucky in 2006, said he had no clue what was happening when officers came into his Vermont cell in the middle of the night, told him to get up and grab his things, and refused to answer when asked where he was going. Shackled to the person next to him, he endured the 36-hour bus ride, still without any idea where he would end up …” The transport process sounds like an awful process, filled with inhumane treatment; in my view the only transport for these men should be back to Vermont. Other men soiled themselves because they could only use the facilities when allowed, even in emergencies. The report went on to state: “The transfer to Kentucky stripped John of access to rehabilitative programs, which simply did not exist at the private prison in Kentucky. Now out of prison and back in Vermont, John regularly advocates for prisoners’ rights, and said, ‘This practice of transferring inmates out-of-state is horrendous. You’re taking people who, whatever support network they may have, is gone. The truth of the matter is [that as an incarcerated person] you’re alone. You’re isolated.’”
Vermont is not only promoting this kind of treatment, in the transfer of inmates, but is continuously allowing inmates to be warehoused with little or no opportunity to work on programs that help them with the reintegration process.
There are the critics in our little state who will say that the further away these bad people are, the better we are. These people are someone’s son, brother, maybe father. Many will come back into our communities. Confining them away from our communities and denying them access to programs for a chance for rehabilitation denies the communities, the victims and the victims’ families an opportunity to repair the harm done.
I served my time. I took part in the programming — initially very reluctantly — but what I got out of the program that I was involved in is that I committed a crime that not only affected the victim, but also the victim’s family, my family, the community I was living in here in Vermont, and the harm caused impacted Vermont. While out of state, I was warehoused, I learned nothing good, except that prison life leads to awful habits and lack of responsibility. So Vermont inmates are being moved to Pennsylvania and we are making room for more to go there. That news is not so good after all.