$44M bridge project starting on I-91

Rockingham Bridge, I-91

Construction is set to begin March 22 on the $44M bridge replacement project on I-91 in Rockingham. Photo by Kristopher Radder/Brattleboro Reformer

ROCKINGHAM – As crews put finishing touches on a $60 million bridge replacement in Brattleboro, state officials are embarking on another major project just a short drive up Interstate 91.

The $44.3 million replacement of two bridges near Exit 6 in Rockingham will start soon, though much of the preliminary work that had been planned for next week has been delayed due to recent snowfall.

The new bridges will replace two steel spans that are in “poor condition,” according to the state Agency of Transportation. Replacing them is a three-year job that’s been entrusted to a Maine-based contractor and a Nebraska-based design firm.

“Both companies are very well-respected and have extensive histories of successfully completing projects of this magnitude and much larger,” said Doug Bonneau, project manager for VTrans.

Taken together, the Brattleboro and Rockingham I-91 bridge projects represent an investment of more than $100 million and more than seven years of work. The bridges at both sites date to the early 1960s, with similar designs.

Both also have exhibited similar structural problems. In Rockingham, the 850-foot-long parallel bridges spanning the Williams River are supported by steel trusses that “are experiencing moderate deterioration,” Bonneau said.

Of greater concern for VTrans are the bridges’ gusset plates – steel plates that tie the steel trusses together. Those plates are undersized by modern standards, and the trusses are considered “fracture critical,” Bonneau said.

“This means that the trusses don’t have the redundancy of support elements that reroute the loads should one element fail,” he said. “This is what led to the failure of the I-35 bridge in Minnesota (in 2007).”

VTrans has noted additional problems at the site including deteriorated concrete decks that are too narrow by today’s standards. The bridges’ steel trusses couldn’t support the heavier, wider concrete decks that are now required, Bonneau said.

The state tapped two companies to replace the Rockingham bridges: Woolwich, Maine-based Reed & Reed Inc. is the project contractor, while Omaha, Neb.-based HDR Engineering Inc. was the designer. Bonneau noted that HDR has a New England presence with offices in Manchester, N.H., and Boston.

The companies were chosen via a “design/build” process meant to reduce costs and encourage creativity. It allows contractors to “figure out the most efficient bridge that they could provide” within parameters set by the state, Bonneau said.

VTrans received several proposals for the Rockingham project and made a selection based on price and technical merits, he added.

The project, which is 90 percent federally funded, will start this spring. First up is construction of a crossover that will allow northbound traffic to be funneled onto one lane of the current southbound bridge.

That traffic switchover is expected to happen in May, officials said. Then, crews can begin demolishing the northbound bridge.

The project is scheduled to run through spring of 2020.

The Brattleboro I-91 bridge replacement started in 2013 and has been plagued by delays that eventually led to a financial settlement between the state and the contractor.

But Bonneau said each of the four teams that submitted proposals for the Rockingham project “agreed that we have allotted a reasonable time frame for the bridge replacements.”

The projected length is based on standard construction practices, Bonneau said. He also said the schedule “includes considerations for accessing the site; building and removing interstate median crossovers; as well as removing and replacing two very tall bridges over an active railroad and river.”

VTrans has designated a public outreach contact for anyone with questions or concerns about the Rockingham project: Stephanie Barrett can be reached at 802-862-6085 or via e-mail at [email protected]

Mike Faher

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Steve Baker

    Let’s cross our fingers and hope this one goes better then the boondoggle bridge project.
    An interesting question for VTrans; what have you Learned and how will you apply those lessens to this project?

  • Tim Vincent

    Whenever I see one of these badly planned and ill-managed (aren’t they all?) highway projects – always overbudget and stretching into years – I think of a viaduct in Scotland carrying railroad trains today…….. built by the Romans.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "$44M bridge project starting on I-91"