Legislation envisions racial justice oversight board - VTDigger

Legislation envisions racial justice oversight board

Advocates are pushing for lawmakers to take up a bill creating an independent board to oversee implementation of racial justice reforms across the state.

The legislation would establish a 12-person board, including members to represent communities of color in the state, as well as representatives of the attorney general, other players in the criminal court system, and the American Civil Liberties Union.

Kiah Morris Kevin Christie

Reps. Kiah Morris, D-Bennington, and Kevin “Coach” Christie, D-Hartford, are co-sponsors of H.492. Photo by Elizabeth Hewitt/VTDigger

The board would review the implementation of racial justice initiatives in Vermont, including data collection and implicit bias policies and trainings.

The panel is proposed in two parallel pieces of legislation — H.492 in the House and S.116 in the Senate.

Reps. Kiah Morris, D-Bennington, and Kevin “Coach” Christie, D-Hartford, co-sponsors of the House bill, encouraged lawmakers to support the measure Thursday.

Morris said the oversight board would fortify laws the state has already adopted.

“We passed these wonderful bills, looking and demanding for racial justice and looking at tracking how racial inequalities are occurring throughout our education systems, within housing, discrimination in employment, a number of different areas as well as throughout our justice system,” Morris said. “But we don’t have a way of coalescing that information and ensuring that the work is actually being done.”

Mark Hughes, of the group Justice For All, has been a key advocate behind the bill.

“We as people of color are vulnerable, and we are counting on you to keep us safe,” Hughes said.

The oversight panel would be focusing on implicit bias in the criminal justice system in general, “not just the police,” Hughes said. The purview would include prosecutors and defense attorneys, judges and the Department of Corrections.

“This is a system issue,” Hughes said.

In the future, the board’s scope could be expanded to cover issues beyond the justice system, including racial disparities in housing, education and access to health care, he said.

The measure has endorsements from key officials, including House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero, and Attorney General TJ Donovan.

“While this bill may not solve all the problems, this is an unequivocal statement that this is a priority and a value of the state of Vermont to treat everybody with respect, everybody with dignity and give everybody the opportunity for justice,” Donovan said.

Donovan sees significant racial disparities in the state’s criminal justice system.

“The disparity is real, and it has to be addressed,” he said.

Mary Brown Guillory, of the Champlain area chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said the state has a long way to go to improve racial justice.

Racial disparities in school discipline and the criminal justice system are substantial and troubling, she said. She thinks the board is a good idea but said more needs to be done.

“However, we already have laws on the books where individuals are not accountable, so it makes no sense to build more petitions when we’re not even observing the law,” Guillory said.

The Legislature is approaching a key deadline Friday when committees in each chamber are expected to complete work on policy bills in order to allow time for the other body to address them.

So far, neither the House nor Senate has taken up the proposal.

However, the chairs of both the House and Senate Judiciary committees said they still expect to work on it this year.

Rep. Maxine Grad, D-Moretown, chair of the House committee, said her panel likely will deal with H.492 next week in conjunction with work relating to fair and impartial policing.

Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington, who chairs the Senate committee, said he supports the spirit of the bill and will be ready to work on it when the House completes its version.

Elizabeth Hewitt

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Neil Johnson

    We already have federal and state people covering fair housing, why do we need a second group doing this?

  • Justin Boland

    I’m curious: is passing legislation without any provisions for “ensuring that the work is actually being done” a common thing?

    That would certainly explain a lot, if such is the case.

  • Excellent idea. Are we going to require Vermonters to register the race they identify with the most or choose to self recognize with? Will races be documented on drivers licenses? Will law enforcement officials be required to ask people they engage with for their self recognized race and gender? Will it be a crime to mis report your race? How do multi racial peoples get recorded? Why not also ask for religion while you’re at it?

  • Paul Richards

    “Mark Hughes, of the group Justice For All, has been a key advocate behind the bill.
    “We as people of color are vulnerable, and we are counting on you to keep us safe,” Hughes said.”
    “Mary Brown Guillory, of the Champlain area chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said the state has a long way to go to improve racial justice.”
    No one dare suggest that this is not needed lest they be labeled as an insensitive racist. So we just continue to allow special interest groups to dictate the “work” of our lawmakers.

    • Joseph Gainza

      Racial justice is not a “special interest;” we all benefit from it. If you think that people of color represent a special interest instead of being other Americans deserving of equal treatment, than you have made the case for this legislation.

  • Claudia Pringles

    Citizens of Vermont have responded to Trump’s misogyny and refugee ban by marching for women and creating “sanctuary cities” for refugees. As a Latina and an immigrant myself, I’m certainly appreciative of these largely symbolic gestures. In the meantime, our otherwise progressive state has one of the highest rates of black incarceration in the country – second only to Iowa. I think the creation of a racial justice board is a positive and tangible step that we can take to make people of color feel welcomed in Vermont.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Legislation envisions racial justice oversight board"