Old Rutland landfill site of new solar microgrid

A utility-scale microgrid is underway in Rutland, Vermont’s largest utility announced Tuesday.

A solar panel and battery storage system at Northern Reliability’s test center in Waitsfield. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

A solar panel and battery storage system at Northern Reliability’s test center in Waitsfield. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

Green Mountain Power (GMP) is constructing a 2-megawatt solar facility on a closed landfill in Rutland, and includes 4 megawatts of battery storage. The company said it expects the project to be completed by December.

The stored energy will be used to shave peak electricity demand at times when solar power is less available – dusk, cloudy afternoons and winter months – and provide emergency backup power for Rutland High School during outages.

GMP says the project, called the Stafford Hill Solar Farm, could theoretically run as a microgrid indefinitely within the lifespan of the equipment. That means the project operates on a closed loop, independent of the region’s electric grid.

The utility designated Rutland City the “Solar Capital of Vermont,” but since then, several larger proposed projects have caused controversy over how solar arrays are sited. But this project’s location on a landfill is a productive use of land because it has not been used for decades, GMP says.

The 9.5-acre landfill closed in the 1990s. The company said the site has settled sufficiently to develop a solar array, and because the landfill has been closed for so long, it no longer emits biomethane, which is often used as another means of energy generation from landfills.

Darren Springer, deputy commissioner of the Department of Public Service, said the project will provide the region with readily available solar power. Typically power grid operators ask utilities to burn fossil fuels to meet high electricity demand on short notice, which, Springer said, is costly and emits greenhouse gases.

The company will hook up the high school to serve as an emergency shelter and will consider expanding to other facilities in the area.

Kristin Carlson, the spokesperson for GMP, said the project is a step toward making communities more resilient to the effects of climate change that can damage electrical infrastructure and create power outages.

GMP has not decided how to account for the renewable energy certificates for the power generated by panels and stored in the batteries. Springer said the generated power could be sold on the market as renewable power, but regulators are still deciding how to account for power coming from the batteries.

Josh Castonguay, of Green Mountain Power, said the lithium ion and lead acid batteries will have to be replaced about every eight to 12 years, depending on how often they are drained and recharged. He said the batteries would be used as little as possible for longevity.

Castonguay said the company is asking the region’s grid operator, ISO New England, to pay for the value battery storage offers for power load management. Having renewable power readily available makes it easier for grid operators to smooth out spikes in electricity demand on short notice.

The company estimates the total project cost for the solar and storage components at about $10 million. GMP received money from the U.S. Department of Energy and the state’s Clean Energy Development Fund to support the project.

South Burlington-based Dynapower will provide the batteries and White River Junction-based commercial and utility solar engineering firm groSolar will provide the panels. State regulators approved the project on July 14.

John Herrick

Leave a Reply

22 Comments on "Old Rutland landfill site of new solar microgrid"


Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Matt Fisken
2 years 5 months ago

And to think, only two months ago I was being asked, “who do you think would undertake [building a microgrid]?”


Although, it’s nice to see GMP prove me wrong, that “utilities are not interested.”

Hopefully it is understood that in situations where the school/shelter is reliant on battery power means avoiding high wattage appliances like ovens, microwave ovens, toasters, etc.

Moshe Braner
2 years 5 months ago
This report leaves us with more questions than answers. First, how large is the storage system? It says “4 MW”. That would be 4 million watts, a measure of power, not energy. E.g., if that system can really output that much instantaneous power, it could simultaneously run 4,000 toasters, each using 1,000 watts. But for how long? If it is a 4 MWH system, i.e., 4 million watt-hours, a measure of energy not power, then it could run those 4000 toasters for one hour. That is, if it can deliver that much power at once. Or it could run, e.g.,… Read more »
2 years 5 months ago
Moshe, Regarding lithium-ion batteries, GM uses only 65% of the 16.5 kWh battery capacity of the Chevy Volt. The available 10.8 kWh (DC) enables the car to be driven “on the batteries” for about 38 miles, after which the gasoline engine takes over. GM limits charging to about 90% (to prevent overcharging which is adverse for all batteries) and discharging to about 25% (to prevent too deep a drawdown of the charge to extend the battery life well beyond the 8 years/100,000 mile warrantee) The 4 MW mentioned in the article should be 4 MWh. It the batteries are lead… Read more »
2 years 5 months ago
Addition to above comment: If a school were to use 300 kWh/day and 4 days of storage is desired, then 1200 kWh is provided to the school, but, accounting for discharge losses and DC to AC conversion, 1200/0.9 = 1320 kWh is withdrawn from the battery. If stored energy in the battery is 4000 kWh, about 4000 – 1320 = 2680 kWh is left, of which only 2680 – 2000 = 680 kWh can be withdrawn at the recommended 50% depth of discharge for lead-acid batteries. The original solar energy fed into the batteries, accounting for charging losses, was 4000/0.9… Read more »
2 years 5 months ago
Addition to the above comment: “The stored energy will be used to shave peak electricity demand at times when solar power is less available – dusk, cloudy afternoons and winter months – and provide emergency backup power for Rutland High School during outages.” During the months of the above table, the on-peak average was 8.14 c/kWh and the solar-weighted, on-peak average was 6.98 c/kWh. There was a shortage of gas last winter causing higher wholesale prices compared to prior years, thus raising the SIMPLE AVERAGE (8.14) and the SOLAR-WEIGHTED, AVERAGE (6.98) wholesale price, for the year!! Had the gas shortage… Read more »
2 years 5 months ago

Wow all this talk about toast is making me feel HUNGRY? These solar power banks are a great idea and are becoming more and more common even here in the UKIt does not say much about the battery system though. thanks eric roberts http://www.batteriesontheweb.co.uk

Annette Smith
2 years 5 months ago
I’m curious how the batteries will be managed. “used as little as possible for longevity” doesn’t really explain it. I use a laptop and was recently told by a computer technician that I should not leave it plugged in because that will shorten the battery life and instead I should run it down to 10% and back up to 100% and down and up. I also read recently that 40/80 is what some people recommend, but the computer technician said go down as far as possible, then back up to 100%. So that’s for a laptop lithium ion battery. My… Read more »
Moshe Braner
2 years 5 months ago
Annette: I think your computer tech is wrong. Some “exercising” of the batteries is good for the batteries, but really deep cycles are not. Not sure what’s the optimum for Lithium Ion batteries. For NiMH, 40/80 is a good compromise if you want to get real use from them (not just emergency backup), and that’s what the Prius does. My Prius is 13 years old and the battery is still OK (but not forever!). The reports on the Hawaii facility are another example of the way most journalists conflate the units of power and energy. This makes it impossible for… Read more »
Annette Smith
2 years 5 months ago
I did a search about laptop and deep cycle batteries and found these: http://www.maclife.com/article/howtos/how_maintain_your_macbook_battery Battery Maintenance Standard Maintenance A Mac portable is just that: a portable computer. It was designed to be plugged and unplugged to allow the battery to discharge and recharge on a normal cycle. As such, if you use your machine plugged in all the time, then it is important that you discharge (or calibrate) your battery every so often. If you rarely use the battery, then Apple recommends completely discharging the battery and charging it again at least once a month. If you use your notebook… Read more »
Glenn Thompson
2 years 5 months ago

To add to this discussion, look into the suggestions electric car manufactures offer to maximize electric vehicle battery life! I’m surprised this one site recommended not to discharge batteries below 80% of rated capacity. Never heard that one before.


As for the topic…..I understand the concept of adding battery storage to solar power but question the feasibility of doing so given the existing technology? Won’t that drive up the costs of solar power?

2 years 5 months ago


See my comments in this string

2 years 4 months ago


For lithium batteries the maximum charge is about 90% of capacity and the minimum charge is about 20% of capacity, which gives 70% of capacity as usable energy.

The in and out losses are less than of lead acid batteries.

The battery cost/kWh of lithium ion batteries is much higher than lead acid.

It is important the charging energy is “smoothed/conditioned” before entering the battery to prolong life.

In case of PV solar and wind energy, the charging energy is variable, which is a no-no for all batteries.

2 years 5 months ago


The best way to extend lead-acid battery life from 6 – 8 years, to 10 – 15 years is to:

– charge to about 90% of capacity
– not discharge below 20% of capacity

Do not:

– deep-cycle greater than 50% of capacity, i.e., exceed going from 90 to 40%, or from 70 to 20%
– charge too fast
– discharge too fast

2 years 5 months ago


The Hawaii battery units were used for “smoothing” short term variations of the energy produced by the wind turbines, similar to the $10.5 synchronous-converter system used by GMP to smooth Lowell energy so as not to be too disruptive to the high voltage grid.

They were NOT used for energy storage.

They may have been charged to quickly causing them to overheat and catch fire.

2 years 5 months ago


What your computer person does not know is that Apple limits to maximum charge (which SHOWS 100%, but is not) and the minimum charge (which shows a warning and then shuts down the computer before the minimum is reached) of the lithium-ion battery.

rosemarie jackowski
2 years 5 months ago

Every day I become more convinced that we need to place increasing emphasis on conservation in order to limit the use of all forms of energy… wind, solar, oil.

I am not suggesting just turning the lights off. But maybe some houses are too large. In the future, we could encourage smaller homes, more windows on the south side, less unnecessary travel… More public transportation. Local, small, and simple is best.

I have a small house. I designed it so that most windows would be on the south side. It makes a big difference.

Moshe Braner
2 years 5 months ago
Rosemarie: you are right. And it is easy to conserve a lot of electricity, mostly with simple behaviors, and with rather modest investments. E.g., turn the lights off when you leave a room. Replace incandescent bulbs with CFLs or LEDs. (CFLs are now only $1 each, have a nice color (get the “warm white”), don’t flicker, and save dozens of $$ EACH relative to indandescents. Some LED bulbs are down to $5, and are even more efficient, and give their max brightness immediately upon turning on, and make no hum nor RF noise.) Don’t light up the outdoors. Use air… Read more »
2 years 5 months ago

One positive of this project is that it isn’t being placed in a Rutland neighborhood or in a meadow along a Vermont scenic roadway.

Hopefully, this will be the start of some common sense thinking in siting industrial solar developments.

Wayne Andrews
2 years 5 months ago

Moshe: The problem I have with electric conservation is the fact that it costs dollars to accomplish this task. Saving electricity is not always saving dollars out of your pocket.
To implement all those topics you describe above would take a lot of money and then add to some major projects the possibility of a cost of a loan.
I do believe in conservation along with creating new forms of electric generation but each one of these saving devices have drawbacks and could take up a lot of space here.

2 years 5 months ago


Your point on the cost of electric conservation is a good one.

I just got our Green Mountain Power statement that shows an energy efficiency charge of $7.35 or 5.9% of our total bill.

Maybe someone can say if a 5.9% charge is a good investment of rate payer’s money by telling us if Vermont is achieving at least a 5.9% reduction in annual electrical consumption?

Moshe Braner
2 years 5 months ago
Costs of my proposals above: $negative – Turn the lights off when you leave a room. $50 – Replace a couple of dozen incandescent bulbs with CFLs or LEDs. And save $2000 in power bills over 5 years – any of your financial savings giving you returns like that? $negative – Don’t light up the outdoors. $negative – Use air conditioning sparingly, and close windows and doors if and when you do. Shade windows on hot sunny days and open windows at night to get cool air in. OK, getting shades, if you don’t have them, may cost you $100.… Read more »
John Greenberg
2 years 5 months ago
First, thanks to Moshe Braner for all his comments here, all of which are right on key. Second, to generalize his specific comments in response to Wayne Andrews, energy efficiency is a global term for a variety of specific projects (like replacing bulbs, or insulating). The financial return on each of these is easily calculable and can be tailored to precise circumstances. There are PLENTY of improvements to be made in Vermont (and elsewhere) with financial returns which make the decisions truly no-brainers, as his examples amply show. Any energy investment which returns far more than any other possible investment… Read more »
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Old Rutland landfill site of new solar microgrid"