State files updated Lake Champlain cleanup plan with EPA

The state updated its Lake Champlain cleanup plan just before the EPA’s Monday night deadline, but a response from federal environmental regulators may be delayed.

The Department of Environmental Conservation sent a draft of the state’s lake restoration plan to the Environmental Protection Agency. Now the state is waiting for information from the agency before Gov. Peter Shumlin sends a final commitment letter.

 A blue-green algae bloom in St. Albans Bay. Photo courtesy of Gould Susslin

A blue-green algae bloom in St. Albans Bay. Photo courtesy of Gould Susslin

The governor said Tuesday at an unrelated news conference that the final plan could be delayed.

“I am prepared to send a commitment letter to the EPA as soon as the EPA requires it. As you know, right now, we’re actually waiting for some information from the EPA, so they may well be asking for some slight delay. So, again, I’m going to stay away from dates,” Shumlin said.

The EPA rejected the state’s water quality plan in 2011 after the Conservation Law Foundation filed a federal lawsuit calling on the state to enhance its water quality standards. The state last year drafted a plan to scale back runoff – the leading cause of phosphorus loading into the lake – and is now awaiting final approval from the EPA.

The EPA, which is enforcing the standards under the Clean Water Act, is still reviewing the plan, according to a spokesman for the agency.

“At first glance, there is certainly more detail than was contained in the proposal the state issued last fall. Those details will require careful review, which EPA has just begun. We will not provide further comment until the review is complete,” David Deegan, a spokesman for the agency, said in a statement.

Shumlin is disappointed the state has not succeeded in cleaning up the lake given the money it has already spent to do so.

“What I can tell you is, I want clean water,” he said. “We are frustrated by the fact that to date we spent a lot of loot without much to show for it.”

The most recent draft, like the state’s previous plan, focuses on nonpoint sources of runoff: agriculture and livestock, transportation, river channels and urban development – all of which are major contributors to phosphorus pollution in the lake.

Scientists link high phosphorus concentrations to harmful algae blooms and the spread of invasive species – harming the aquatic habitat and affecting major drivers of the state’s economy, such as lakeside businesses and tourism.

The plan guides new, far-reaching development standards and agricultural practices – “a full suite of tools,” said Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner David Mears, who has been working closely on the plan.

David Mears, commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation, testified before lawmakers in February on the state’s plan to restore Lake Champlain’s water quality. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

David Mears, commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation, testified before lawmakers in February on the state’s plan to restore Lake Champlain’s water quality. Photo by John Herrick/VTDigger

Under the plan, farmers would meet new acceptable agricultural practices (AAPs), such as seeding waterways to prevent gully erosion; the state and towns would invest in drainage and culverts along roads; river channels would be restored to their natural courses; and cities would have to invest in “green” stormwater infrastructure.

Though the plan does not address staffing levels at the agencies responsible for overseeing the cleanup, the plan is designed to be enforceable, Mears said.

“It’s real programs with increased oversight and accountability, combined with education, outreach and assistance,” he said.

The oversight and assistance will come at a cost, however. “We discussed funding to the extent that we need to be more coordinated,” Mears said.

Mears said the administration will have a proposal for the Legislature to consider by fall.

Lawmakers this session have been scrambling to find revenue sources for the cleanup, including raising the state’s rooms and meals tax, the liquor and wine sales tax, and placing an added fee on rental cars. Together these sources would generate about $4 million for assistance programs.

Shumlin, who has committed to raise no new taxes, said he met last week with Gina McCarthy, the administrator for the EPA, to discuss how the state can partner with every possible federal agency to support the cleanup.

“I personally think that we shouldn’t raise Vermont money until we get every penny that we can out of the federal government. And we will,” he said.

The state could lose federal funding for the cleanup and face heightened regulations on water treatment centers if the EPA does not accept the plan.

“Upon receiving EPA’s approval of the Phase One Plan as proposed, the Department [of Environmental Conservation] will work with our state agency partners to request additional federal funds, and will seek additional state funding as necessary,” the report reads.

Either way, the state will pay for cleanup, Mears says, and upgrading wastewater treatment facilities provides little return on investments. (In fact, the most recent plan does not even reference this source of pollution, he said.)

John Herrick

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Heidi Chance

    Liquid cow manure running off into the waterways. That is what I believe is the front runner of this problem. This must be aggressively addressed or we will continue to ‘spend a lot of loot’ with no benefit.

  • I was up early this AM and found this article on vtdigger:

    This article seems to have been taken down, for some reason. vtdigger, can you explain? Why was it replaced with this article by Mr. Herrick?

    I found the McClaughry article to be very revealing in what the EPA intends to bring to Vermont around the problem with Phosphorus our waters. We do not need the Feds to tell us how to run our lives, especially on our Small Farms. Leave Mom and Pop alone.

    • Cate Chant

      John Herrick is a VTDigger reporter and his is a news story. John McClaughry is the vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute and his piece is a commentary, an opinion piece. Both are on the VTDigger home page. The commentary section is below the news section.

  • Tom Pelham

    Maybe CLF needs to cut through the “rope-a-dope” strategy of state environmental leaders with regard to Lake Champlain clean-up and employ a similar strategy they used for cleaning up Boston Harbor, especially since this problem covers two state jurisdictions.

    Before I returned home to Vermont, my employment was as the first MWRA Director of Development putting together the on-shore staging and lay down sites necessary to support the transfer of construction materials and workers to Deer Island from Quincy and East Boston. I saw firsthand the advantages of having Judge Mazzone guide the harbor clean-up process to a successful conclusion by, in part, cutting through the political BS often so deeply entrenched in Massachusetts government.

    Further, CLF should diligently follow the money in state government to find funding for clean-up efforts. Raising taxes need not and should not be the first option and will lead to resistance to any clean-up strategy. Relatively minor reforms in how we spend state funds dedicated to human services and education funds, which comprise 73 percent of such funds in the total state budget, should be a top priority. Over the last five years, state funds supporting ANR’s budget have increased at the annual rate of 1.96 percent with most of this increase coming from “special funds” rather than the general fund. Over the same period, the annual growth rate of state funds supporting AHS has been 8.05 percent with general funds increasing at the rate of 8.43 percent per year totally $215.1 million. Since 2000, the annual growth rate in state, non-federal funds to AHS has been 7.02 percent.

    ANR, the teachers’ pension fund, and Vermont’s higher education institutions, among others, are all in the same waterlogged boat of getting the left-over’s in state funds only after the two largest and fastest growing sectors, human services and education, get their sizable apportionments.

  • Sandy Gregg

    If you google map Lake Champlain you can see the algae blooms all along the shoreline. Please tell me someone is doing this and more importantly doing something about it.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State files updated Lake Champlain cleanup plan with EPA"