Commentary

Leffler: What Vermont’s new end of life choice law means for Fletcher Allen

Editor’s note: This piece is by Stephen M. Leffler, M.D., the chief medical officer at Fletcher Allen Health Care and former medical director of the Emergency Department, who has been a practicing physician for 20 years. It was first published on the Fletcher Allen blog on June 5, 2013.

Vermont became the fourth state in the nation to make it legal for a patient with a terminal illness to obtain a prescription with the intent to hasten their death.

Unlike most new laws, where there’s usually a period of several months before they go into effect, this one went into effect last week, immediately after being signed by the governor.

This new law raises complex emotional and ethical issues for patients and providers. While the intent of the law is clear, the rules and regulations for how it will be carried out still must be determined.

Should we make the interim ban permanent? Should we educate our providers on the best methods to carry this out? Should we credential providers to perform this service? Should the medical staff oversee and review cases?

Our Legislature allowed health care facilities to be excluded from the legislation for patients who are residents of the facility and intend to take the medication on site. Fletcher Allen has chosen to enact the facility exemption on an interim basis. This will give us the opportunity to develop a thoughtful, compassionate policy that will respect our patients and providers.

Our medical staff has already started a dialogue on the new law. Issues that face us include: Should we make the interim ban permanent? Should we educate our providers on the best methods to carry this out? Should we credential providers to perform this service? Should the medical staff oversee and review cases? Our Ethics Committee has met twice and is developing a plan to allow and encourage all opinions to be heard.

Our institution also has a number of complex decisions to make. Will our pharmacy carry and supply the medication? Will we regulate what medication to use? What if a patient brings the medication from home and wishes to self-administer it here? If a patient is requesting a prescription with the intention to hasten their death and our facility does not participate, would we transfer the patient to another facility?

VTDigger is underwritten by:

Fletcher Allen’s clinical and administrative leadership are committed to thoroughly reviewing the new law and, through an inclusive process, answering all of these questions to the best of our ability. The answers will help guide our decisions, including whether to permanently exercise the health care facility exception.

Most importantly, it is imperative for us to approach the new law in a way that continues to focus on the patient being the center of our care.

Fletcher Allen currently has comprehensive programs for patients at the end of life. We have outstanding palliative care and hospice care providers and services, delivered here on a daily basis. While giving patients another choice at the end of their lives, this new law does not replace these crucial services – and as happened in Oregon when it passed similar legislation almost 15 years ago, hopefully its passage will lead to a better understanding and expanded use of both palliative care and hospice care.

,


Commentary

About Commentaries

VTDigger.org publishes 12 to 18 commentaries a week from a broad range of community sources. All commentaries must include the author’s first and last name, town of residence and a brief biography, including affiliations with political parties, lobbying or special interest groups. We have a minimum length of 400 words. We have found the ideal length is approximately 600 to 800 words. We provide some copyediting support, but we do not have the staff to fact-check commentaries. We reserve the right to reject opinions for matters of taste and accuracy. Commentaries are voices from the community and do not represent VTDigger in any way. Please send your commentary to Cate Chant, [email protected], and Anne Galloway, [email protected]

Email: [email protected]

Reader Footnotes

Please help move our stories forward with information we can use in future articles.

Readers must submit actual first and last names and email addresses in order for notes to be approved. We are no longer requiring readers to submit user names and passwords.

We have a limit of 1,000 characters. We moderate every reader note.

Notes about other readers’ points of view will not be accepted. We will only publish notes responding to the story.

For more information, please see our guidelines. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

About voting: If you see voting totals jump when you vote on comments, this indicates that other readers have been voting at the same time.
VTDigger Reader Footnotes are now closed on this story.
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
 

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Leffler: What Vermont’s new end of life choice law means for Fletch..."