Amendment to increase unemployment pay fails in House

Rep. Chris Pearson. VTD/Josh Larkin

Rep. Chris Pearson. VTD/Josh Larkin

A $700,000 increase to benefits for the unemployed failed to gain much traction on the House floor on Friday, failing in a 19-118 vote.

The increase, which was to take effect when the state has paid back a 2010 federal unemployment insurance loan, was an amendment offered by Reps. Chris Pearson, P-Burlington, and John Moran, D-Wardsboro. Moran co-chairs the Working Vermonters Legislative caucus and Pearson leads the Progressive caucus.

They told the Democratic House caucus Friday afternoon that the increase amounts to $9 per week increase for unemployed Vermonters. The two legislators argued that, because the economy and the state’s unemployment insurance trust fund fared better than forecast, the unemployed should share in that economic bounty, too.

But the House Commerce and Economic Development committee stood firmly against the change, voting it down 11-0. Committee chair Bill Botzow, D-Pownal, told the caucus that the fund still owes some $50 million to the feds from a loan and is too fragile to tinker with at this point.

“Share the pain, share the gain” rhetoric, referring to the higher payments and benefit cuts imposed on businesses and the unemployed, respectively, in 2010 rang false in this case, said Rep. Paul Ralston, D-Middlebury.

Benefits are set to increase again in July 2014, so Pearson’s and Moran’s amendment moved that date six months forward, under current projections. Their amendment would have also tied benefit payment levels to inflation.

The state is projected to pay back the $50 million still outstanding from its federal loan by the end of this year. If it pays that back on time, businesses will avoid an additional federal penalty, which they suffered once already this year, known as a FUTA (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) penalty.

“This amendment is misguided in that it’s actually anti-labor,” Ralston told the caucus. “You have to help us rebuild the trust fund. That is the insurance policy that pays for people when they are out of work.”

Pearson countered by pointing out that almost all of the state’s major unions left a letter in legislators’ mailboxes, backing the amendment.

Rep. Dave Sharpe, D-Bristol, who backed similar benefit increases earlier, voted against the amendment Friday.

“Would I like to spend more money today? Absolutely,” Sharpe said on the House floor. “Do we have more money to spend? Not yet. In the coming years, when we hope that the coffers will be fuller, we will be able to do something for unemployed workers.”

Nat Rudarakanchana

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Kevin McGrath

    The State of Vermont is actually actively denying unemployment benefits to people who are rightfully qualified to receive them. The state is using what the state calls a “Reemployment Program” to actively intimidate people who are rightfully qualified to receive unemployment benefits. The program puts so many hurdles that can’t be met, in an effort deny them benefits. The worst part of is that it is used in very selective manner base on certain socioeconomic criteria. Basically, the State of Vermont re-victimizes hard working people who have lost their job and lets socially irresponsible business off the hook for their decisions.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Amendment to increase unemployment pay fails in House"