Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel
Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel. Photo by Mike Faher/VTDigger
[B]RATTLEBORO โ€“ At the first meeting of the Vermont Nuclear Decommissioning Citizens Advisory Panel in 2014, there was lots of talk about the need for openness and transparency.

Lately, though, a dispute has arisen about how far the panel has to go to meet those goals. In fact, some members have proposed limiting press and public use of a call-in feature for those who cannot attend meetings in person.

Panel Chairwoman Kate O’Connor is pushing back against such changes. After a Tuesday meeting of a newly formed Public Access Subcommittee, O’Connor said she wants the full advisory panel to consider language mandating that all โ€œreasonable accommodationsโ€ be made to allow for remote access to future VNDCAP meetings.

โ€œWe don’t want to take any action to limit anyone, because we are a public body formed by the Legislature,โ€ O’Connor said.

Vermont Yankee ceased producing power at the end of 2014, and the 19-member citizens advisory panel has been meeting regularly to discuss decommissioning issues. Its duties include advising the Legislature, the governor and state agencies; the panel also is charged with serving as โ€œa conduit for public information and education on (decommissioning) and to encourage community involvement.โ€

It’s common for some members of the advisory panel to call into meetings when they can’t make it to Windham County. But the current debate began when O’Connor allowed a Rutland Herald reporter listen in via phone for the panel’s February meeting, and Entergy representatives subsequently objected.

A month later, at the panel’s March 24 meeting, O’Connor said she was surprised by the company’s concern. โ€œIt didn’t occur to me that it would be a problem to have a reporter on the phone,โ€ she said at the time. โ€œI see this as a public panel. Our goal is to get our information out to the public. One of those avenues is through the news media.โ€

Paul Paradis, Vermont Yankee’s decommissioning director, responded by saying he was not objecting to open meetings. Rather, Paradis said he was worried about the quality of journalism gleaned from a conference call.

โ€œMy concern was, what you hear on the phone versus what you hear face-to-face,โ€ Paradis told fellow panel members in March. โ€œSometimes, it’s two different things. And the accuracy of the reporting could be compromised.โ€

The March discussion picked up steam from there. A diverse roster of panel members โ€“ including state Commerce and Community Development Secretary Pat Moulton; Vernon representative Steve Skibniowski; and the governor’s appointee Martin Langeveld โ€“ said they’d like to limit use of call-ins to panel members only.

David Andrews, a panel member who represents present and former employees of Vermont Yankee, wondered whether the phone system would be adequate if many members of the public wanted to call in at once. โ€œIt’s a very slippery slope, and I think we’ve already started to go down it,โ€ Andrews said.

Andrews was among those who also noted that Brattleboro Community Television posts video of panel meetings a few days after the sessions. The question of allowing remote access โ€œseems almost like a non-issue to me,โ€ he said.

At the urging of Windham Regional Commission Executive Director Chris Campany, a Public Access Subcommittee was formed to come up with a solution. Just two subcommittee members โ€“ O’Connor and Jim Tonkovich โ€“ showed up for a meeting Tuesday in Brattleboro, but they endorsed new, more inclusive public-access language submitted by Campany, another member.

The proposed, two-sentence policy reiterates the advisory panel’s mission and says VNDCAP โ€œwill make reasonable accommodations to facilitate access to panel meetings by those who are unable to attend in person.โ€ Those accommodations โ€œmay include live streaming of meeting audio via the internet, access by conference phone or similar means.โ€

O’Connor said she hopes the full advisory panel adopts the language at its next scheduled meeting in May. โ€œIf we can settle it now, and put it in the charter, we won’t be having these discussions at every meeting,โ€ she said.

Limiting public access, O’Connor added, โ€œgoes against everything that the committee is supposed to be about.โ€

O’Connor on Tuesday talked with state Nuclear Engineer Tony Leshinskie, who serves as a technical adviser at VNDCAP meetings, about ways to beef up the advisory panel’s audio and visual equipment to accommodate any increased demand for remote access.

They also produced state records showing that February wasn’t the first time a reporter was allowed to join an advisory panel meeting remotely. In January, a radiological waste reporter from Washington, D.C., listened in.

Those records show that a few state officials who are not panel members also have called in to meetings, as have others not affiliated with state government.

A question about media access โ€œis how this whole thing started,โ€ O’Connor said. โ€œBut it’s a broader issue. The public is the bigger issue.โ€

Asked about the proposed public access language, Vermont Yankee spokesman Marty Cohn said the company likely won’t object if remote meeting access is advertised and made available both to the press and to the public.

โ€œWe welcome public participation and believe that, as long as everyone has access, that’s fair,โ€ Cohn said.

Twitter: @MikeFaher. Mike Faher reports on health care and Vermont Yankee for VTDigger. Faher has worked as a daily newspaper journalist for 19 years, most recently as lead reporter at the Brattleboro...

One reply on “State officials, Entergy seek to limit public access to nuke panel meetings”