Vermont Yankee presents post-Fukushima safety and emergency plans

Vermont Yankee gave a detailed presentation on Monday of safety and emergency changes in response to Japan’s 2011 Fukushima disaster, in a quiet public hearing at the Statehouse attended by about a dozen people. Unlike last year’s more crowded VSNAP hearings, only three members of the public testified.

Representing Vermont Yankee, Entergy’s state liaison engineer Bernard Buteau gave a 45 minute presentation on how the plant and the nuclear industry is addressing concerns raised by the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Tier 1 or short-term immediate issues, which require attention in light of Fukushima, include how a plant can be ready to mitigate severe natural disasters, like floods and earthquakes, through advance design and personnel planning. The presentation focused mostly on these problems.

Among Tier 1 recommendations for Vermont Yankee specifically:
– Mitigation strategies for cases where cooling elements in the plant fail (e.g. loss of the river or dam), or extended loss of electrical power
– Reassessing the Mark 1 containment vent
– Installing new spent fuel pool instruments
– Re-evaluation and inspection of the plant’s capacity to handle earthquake and flooding scenarios

In March 2012, the NRC ordered Vermont Yankee to deal with upgrading its current container vent for the Mark 1 reactor, which dates back to the early 1990s, as well as handle spent fuel pool items and develop strategies for handling natural disasters and other unpredictable events.

In April 2012, the plant acknowledged it had no hardship addressing the specific concerns raised by the NRC. Since detailed Interim Staff Guidance will be issued by the NRC in August 2012, some details remain left unknown, like necessary design specifications for the upgraded vent housing the Mark 1 reactor.

Entergy is also creating an internal “Fukushima response organization” to deal with and select contractors for equipment changes, to which Buteau said Entergy will commit over 100 employees.

After the presentation, VSNAP panel members questioned Buteau and Michael Romeo, a nuclear safety assurance official at Vermont Yankee, on technical and regulatory points. State Sen. Mark MacDonald, D-Orange, questioned whether the NRC-imposed standards were too relaxed, allowing virtually the entire industry easy compliance, or alternatively easily obtained waivers if plants did not meet standards.

“The NRC has the strictest regulations in the world,” said MacDonald after the hearing. “But people who don’t meet their strict regulations are eligible for waivers: and they get them.”

“They change the graduation requirements, and everybody graduates,” he said. “It will be interesting to see how many plants fail to meet the new higher standards of the NRC, or if once again, every plant will pass.”

MacDonald described Vermont Yankee as “patting themselves on the back” for working towards the standards early, but said the deadline was set considerably far ahead. Another panel member, Bill Irwin, the radiological expert for the Department of Health, also said that deadlines for NRC compliance were set too far in the future, and hoped that VY made changes by 2014, rather than the later NRC deadline of December 31, 2016.

VSNAP chair Elizabeth Miller described the meeting as more “lightly attended” than previous hearings in Windham County. “Frankly, I knew it would be difficult given the interim nature – the plant is waiting for so much still – but I thought it’d important for the panel to have a framework” for understanding the changes.

Miller is concerned about pending station blackout rules and steam dryer inspection protocol.

Pro-nuclear activist Meredith Angwin, a Wilder resident, said that the “absolutely clear” and “complex” presentation answered all the right questions, while Richard Garant, an anti-nuclear activist, denounced the planned improvements as a “show game.”

“These improvements are very vague, and the presentation was just a stock presentation,” said the Brattleboro resident. “But I didn’t expect a whole lot different.”

This first VSNAP meeting of the year featured new panel member Dr. Leslie Kanat, a geology professor at Johnson State College and public member. The next VSNAP meeting is likely to be scheduled in September 2012.

Nat Rudarakanchana

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "Vermont Yankee presents post-Fukushima safety and emergency plans"

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Mike Kerin
4 years 18 days ago
The NRC has the strictest regulations in the world,” said MacDonald after the hearing. “But people who don’t meet their strict regulations are eligible for waivers: and they get them.” “They change the graduation requirements, and everybody graduates,” he said. “It will be interesting to see how many plants fail to meet the new higher standards of the NRC, or if once again, every plant will pass.” MacDonald described Vermont Yankee as “patting themselves on the back” for working towards the standards early, but said the deadline was set considerably far ahead. Another panel member, Bill Irwin, the radiological expert… Read more »
John Greenberg
4 years 18 days ago

The time to have made these changes is BEFORE the accident, not AFTER some arbitrary date set by regulators for the convenience of the regulated. I’ll bet Fukushima Daiichi wishes it had made these changes before March 2011!

Bob Stannard
4 years 18 days ago

The NRC will “demand” that the industry abide by the new regulations until Entergy, or one of them, cry hardship; at which time the NRC will do what it always does – back off.

The NRC is an embarrassment to our nation.

Alex Barnham
4 years 18 days ago

In other words, same old same old and if there is a disaster, Entergy gets away with murder.

Alex Barnham
4 years 17 days ago

You “play” with fire. The game is “no”. You ban hydro and allow stupid.

Wendy Rae Woods
4 years 10 days ago

As with most “pulling the wool over the eyes” routines, find out where the wool came from and how much it cost. This is a crime in the making.

wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vermont Yankee presents post-Fukushima safety and emergency plans"