A beige stone building with a prominent entrance featuring double wooden doors, two lanterns, and a staircase. The building is located at 111 State Street and has American and state flags displayed.
The Vermont Supreme Court building on State Street in Montpelier in June, 2024. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The Vermont Supreme Court has declined to intervene in the Scott administrationโ€™s effort to uphold its employee return-to-office policy โ€” for now.

Last week, the Vermont Labor Relations Board ordered that the administration rescind its policy requiring employees to work at least three days per week at their worksites. 

Gov. Phil Scott and top administration officials said at the time that the state would appeal the decision and request a pause on the order from both the labor board and Vermontโ€™s high court. 

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled that the administration โ€œmust first seek a stayโ€ from the labor board, denying a request to pause last weekโ€™s decision. 

Steve Howard, executive director of the Vermont State Employeesโ€™ Association, called the ramifications of last weekโ€™s legal proceedings โ€œvery confusingโ€ for state employees.  

With its decision last week, the Vermont Labor Relations Board has called into question what working life could look like for the approximately 8,000 Vermont state employees. 

Last summer, officials in Scottโ€™s administration told state workers โ€” many of whom began working from home during the Covid-19 pandemic โ€” that beginning in December all staff had to return to their designated offices at least three days per week. 

The administrationโ€™s move sparked outcry from the state employeesโ€™ union, which sought at first to have the state courts block the policy, without success. 

But the labor boardโ€™s order last week has now threatened to upend the entire return-to-office policy. The order required that the state offer to rehire former employees who left their jobs as a result of the in-person work requirements. The board said Scottโ€™s administration will also need to โ€œmake all affected employees wholeโ€ through reimbursement for โ€œany monetary lossesโ€ caused by the return-to-office policy.

Last week, Scott called the labor boardโ€™s decision โ€œdisappointing, but not surprising,โ€ and his office lambasted the body as โ€œbrokenโ€ following its order.

For now, life for state employees is mostly status quo. Howard said the union is telling members to follow their supervisorsโ€™ directives on where to work from. 

In a Wednesday message to state employees, Administration Secretary Sarah Clark apologized for not having all the answers about how the labor board decision will impact staff.

โ€œIf the Boardโ€™s order is stayed, we will not implement it while the stay is in effect. If it is not stayed, we plan to work with the Vermont State Employeesโ€™ Association to act on the Boardโ€™s order,โ€ she wrote. โ€œWe understand the uncertainty is not ideal, and it is not how we prefer to approach this situation.โ€

The state filed a request for a stay with the labor board April 2, according to Lauren Jandl, chief of staff in the Vermont Attorney Generalโ€™s Office. 

In an email, Jandl said the next legal step is for the state employeesโ€™ union to respond to the administrationโ€™s filing with the labor board. The state then has another opportunity to reply, Jandl said, and the labor board can make a ruling on the request for a stay after that.

VTDigger's statehouse bureau chief.