This commentary is by Neil Odell of Norwich. He is on the steering committee of Friends of Vermont Public Education, and is a Norwich/Dresen school board member.

Back in late February, I had to stand up at Town Meeting and tell my community that I anticipated our taxes would increase by double digits.

It wasnโ€™t fun.

Weโ€™re looking at a 15% increase, and Iโ€™m not at all happy about it. I have to pay it, too. My town elected me to make decisions about our schools and about our taxes, and this year I felt like I just couldnโ€™t get it right on either side of the equation.

Gov. Phil Scott said it was simple. Just spend less. Less where? Pay our teachers and staff less? Kinda hard with a contractually binding labor agreement with the union. Fire some teachers or staff? A possibility that we considered but neither the board nor families were happy with increased class sizes. Spend less on health care? Also a bit challenging when we donโ€™t get to set the premium rates.

Maybe we could abandon our failing septic system replacement. Despite what we were told by health officials and concerned families, perhaps some fecal matter on the school green in the winter isnโ€™t that bad for kids.

I thought about getting rid of sports teams or music or theater programs at the middle and high schools, but my colleagues from the New Hampshire side of our interstate school district were not persuaded.

I ran the numbers. Weโ€™d need to cut approximately $3.5 million from our elementary budget for a near zero increase in the tax rate. Coincidentally, that was the line item amount for the entire regular education portion of my budget โ€” all teachers and school supplies โ€” a flat tax rate for a school with no teachers. 

But it ainโ€™t simple, and Iโ€™m pretty sure the governor knows that. His one-liner is really appealing – who doesnโ€™t want lower taxes? His solution? Borrow. Yup, borrow. Borrow from the money set aside for schools for next year. So we all get a year of โ€œreliefโ€ only to lament next year that weโ€™ve got an even bigger hole to fill in the education fund.

Guess what happens then? We raise property taxes to fill that hole. Thatโ€™s the type of solution you get when you donโ€™t have the right people at the table. Weโ€™re talking about a Vermont childโ€™s life and future.

If you donโ€™t know where the money is going and simply just cut your way out of this situation, you stand to impact an entire generation of folks that we want to be the future of Vermont. 

The governor claimed that the veto override of the yield bill was โ€œa major loss for Vermont taxpayers, workers and families.โ€ I disagree.

According to Vermontโ€™s nonpartisan Joint Fiscal Office, โ€œWithout a yield bill, property taxes would not raise sufficient revenue for the Education Fund, leading to an estimated deficit of $82 million.โ€

As a result our kids would take the hit, schools would be shorted the money they need and next year taxpayers would be facing an even larger property tax increase because we would need to make up the $82 million first before even considering any new school spending. Thatโ€™s what the governor wanted? 

Thereโ€™s another reason that the veto override of the yield bill was good for Vermonters. The bill established a commission that will begin work on July 15 on the future of education in Vermont.

The governor will be at the table. The Legislature will be at the table. Schools, school boards, even private schools will be at the table. Their job? To develop a vision for Vermont education including โ€œa written report containing its preliminary findings and recommendations, including short-term cost containment considerations for the 2025 legislative session, on or before December 15, 2024โ€. 

Dig into the details, and youโ€™ll see that the commission will be holding numerous public meetings throughout the state this summer and fall and public engagement is a priority. My school board colleagues and I are ready to get to work.

I do not want to tell my community at next year’s Town Meeting that our taxes are going up by double digits again. So, Scott, we agree. We both feel obligated to be the voice of Vermonters. Now letโ€™s get to the real work. See you in July.

Pieces contributed by readers and newsmakers. VTDigger strives to publish a variety of views from a broad range of Vermonters.