This commentary is by Don Keelan of Arlington, a retired certified public accountant.
Several months ago, the Vermont Students Antiracism Network organization issued a 19-page report called the Vermont Racial Equity Report 2022. The organization sent the report to most, if not all, Vermont high schools.
For those unfamiliar with the Students Antiracism Network, here are the organization’s mission and vision statements as noted on its website:
- Mission: “We endeavor to educate ourselves and others about race, power, privilege and oppression in order to foster a more inclusive and antiracist community, starting with our schools. We strive to disrupt the racial hierarchy of our society, starting within our group.”
- Vision: “We envision a Vermont that actively works to redress injustice and seeks to center voices of color. We envision a Vermont that acknowledges the ways that racism and other oppressions are historically and institutionally embedded, realizing our ethical obligation to address and combat these oppressions. We envision change coming from fair and accurate accounting in schools about history and systemic racism.”
The report calls attention to the history of racism in Vermont, as far back as the 17th century and as recently as a few years ago. The report also accentuates the pattern of racism that exists in housing, health care and the criminal justice system.
The report’s second part outlines the results of a high school student survey — however, only at one school, Bennington’s Mount Anthony Union High School.
Anytime one reduces a controversial subject to writing, there will be a reaction: for it, against it, or neutral. For this columnist, it is much the same.
I wish to thank the three high school students (one now in college) who authored the report. It took substantial time to research, compile surveys, interview, write, edit, publish and distribute. A piece like this does not happen if you spend your time only on social media.
But with any published piece, there can be room for suggestions, criticism, or both. The Vermont Racial Equity Report 2022 is no different.
One noticeable item was that the report contained many generalizations and lacked specificity: “Vermont has disparities in the criminal justice system that are on par with the South.” Really?
Another: “Black people are also more likely to live in food deserts.” Where?
The report says, “Today, many neighborhoods are still segregated because of the legacy of redlining and racial covenants.” Again, where?
The report also notes, “In 1997, a new governor stripped away the rights and recognition of Abenaki Vermonters.” I know who that governor was and believe the accusation is taken out of context, which is too bad.
Many other generalizations are noted, but what is unmentioned is any positive experiences in Vermont (and elsewhere) over the past four centuries regarding the BIPOC community. Hopefully, that will be in a follow-up report.
But the report went far from its mission statement when the authors enlisted the assistance of The Vision of the Other Belonging Institute at the University of California at Berkeley. The institute was founded by the Walter and Evelyn Haas Jr. Fund, a half-billion-dollar family foundation that directs its support to left-leaning causes.
The authors used the institute as the primary source for their “Recommended Solutions.” They listed a host of fixes that should be implemented in “policing, criminal, youth, housing, economic justice, education (only a partial listing).” They include: eliminating traffic stops, qualified immunity and cash bail; providing guaranteed living income; eliminating mass incarceration; decreasing the prison population; ending student debt; closing the racial wealth gap; producing 600,000 units of low- and moderate-income housing in a year, and 6 million in the next five years; and establishing universal health care and expanding Medicare.
Those are controversial, complex and highly emotional issues. Had I not asked one of the report’s authors for the source, I would have concluded that Sen. Bernie Sanders was involved. It reads like his goals, and that is when I concluded the report had gone sideways from being a report on the history of racism in Vermont to information on polarized political objectives.
