Business & Economy

Receiver’s offer to AnC Bio investors: $500,000 refunds or ‘redeploy’ it

Michael Goldberg
Michael Goldberg, court-appointed receiver in Vermont’s EB-5 investment fraud. Photo by Anne Galloway/VTDigger
More than 130 EB-5 investors in a proposed $110 million biomedical research facility in Newport later deemed by regulators “nearly a complete fraud” have a choice to make.

But the clock is ticking.

The investors have until Aug. 31 to decide to either get back their $500,000 investment in AnC Bio Vermont, or put the money toward another project approved by a court to raise funds through the federal EB-5 visa program.

That program allows immigrant investors to become eligible for permanent U.S. residency provided their investment of at least $500,000 in a qualified project creates a required numbers of American jobs.

“If you elect to have your principal investment refunded, it is our belief that you will lose any EB-5 priority and eligibility to obtain permanent residence status that you may have,” Michael Goldberg, a court-appointed receiver, wrote in a recent letter to the investors.

“Alternatively, my immigration lawyers and I are developing a plan whereby you may be able to have your funds redeployed through the AnC Bio partnership into a new project and continue to maintain your eligibility to remove conditions on your residence.”

Goldberg oversees the Newport property as well as several others in Vermont’s Northeast Kingdom, including the Jay Peak and Burke ski resorts, that are part of the largest alleged EB-5 investor fraud case in the program’s history.

Regulators with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission characterized AnC Bio as “nearly a complete fraud” and accuse project developer Ariel Quiros of stealing money directly from the early investors in the project.

The SEC brought a lawsuit against Quiros, owner of Jay Peak ski resort, and Bill Stenger, the resort’s former CEO and president, in April 2016.

Regulators allege two men operated a “Ponzi-like” scheme and misused $200 million of the more than $350 million raised for seven out of eight EB-funded development projects, including AnC Bio. In all, the developers brought in $440 million from immigrant investors.

Earlier this year, a judge approved a request from Goldberg to return $17.85 million to 35 investors in AnC Bio Vermont whose money had been kept in an escrow account. Money from new EB-5 investors in AnC Bio Vermont was put in escrow after financial problems faced by an AnC Bio affiliate in Korea raised questions about the Vermont project.

That group of 35 investors is not eligible for the “redeployment” offer since their funds never formally made it into the AnC Bio partnership, and they have already been provided refunds, Goldberg said.

Those eligible, he said, are the 133 EB-5 investors who had put a total of about $67 million into the AnC Bio Vermont project before the state required the developers to hold funds in escrow accounts.

Goldberg’s offer letter to AnC Bio Vermont investors follows a federal judge in June approving a $150 million settlement between the receiver and Raymond James & Associates Inc, a financial institution used by Quiros.

The receiver had earlier filed a lawsuit against Raymond James alleging the financial services firm “aided and abetted” the “Ponzi-like” scheme regulators accused Quiros of operating. In the settlement, Raymond James admitted no wrongdoing.

That $150 million settlement includes the $67 million needed to pay for the refunds or reinvestments in another qualified EB-5 project.

Goldberg said those AnC Bio Vermont investors not already “conditional” U.S. residents based on paperwork filed when making their initial investment should consult with their immigration attorney to determine their eligibility to reinvest and become permanent U.S. residents.

The receiver said he expected that most of the 134 investors who are already “conditional” U.S. residents will choose to “redeploy” their money. That’s because they have already started the process to become permanent U.S. residents.

“Most have already been in the system for about two years,” Goldberg said Thursday. “We’re hoping to preserve that priority so they don’t have to go to the back of the line and they can pick up right where they left off.”

Going back to the end of the line, he added, can mean starting what could be a 10-year process over again from the beginning.

The receiver did say in his letter that while he initially had hoped that each investor seeking to “redeploy” their $500,000 could choose a qualified project on their own, through consultation with attorneys, that no longer appears to be the case.

“I am currently in the process of performing the necessary due diligence on several potential projects to choose one project into which all of the investors’ funds could be redeployed,” Goldberg wrote.

He said that choice will be based on the track record of the EB-regional center overseeing the project, the reputation of the developer, and the ability of the project to create jobs in a short period of time. Also, the developer is expected to waive any administrative fees for the AnC Bio investors, which can be in the range of $50,000 each.

Goldberg added that he won’t be the one deciding on the project. He said he’s hired an outside company that specializes in selecting EB-5 investment projects to perform “due diligence” on the developers and make a recommendation.

That recommendation will then be filed in federal court and Judge Darrin P. Gayles, who is presiding in the SEC, would ultimately have to approve it.

Those agreeing to have the funds held in an escrow account as they consider whether to have the funds “redeployed” in a pending project are asked to return forms sent to the them by the receiver by Aug. 31.

Investors not seeking that option can return to his office a separate form sent to them indicating they want their $500,000 investment refunded.

There are some investors, Goldberg added, who have decided to take that option.

“In fact,” he said Thursday, “I’m giving another three people their money back today.”

If you read us, please support us.

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer.

We moderate every comment. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

Alan J. Keays

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Receiver’s offer to AnC Bio investors: $500,000 refunds or ‘redep..."
  • Edgar Stout

    EB-5 is a scam. We should be cultivating investors right here. There should be no need for overseas strangers wealth. Nobody knows what these “investors” have done to “earn” their wealth. Have they employed people and profited from the labor of sweatshops? Give them back the $500k, and tell them to get lost.

  • Steve Baker

    I would say that’s a pretty good deal for the investors. Lose nothing or reinvest. Most investors know generally there are no guaranties.
    Now if we can make the Contractors/Suppliers more whole, repair the damage in downtown Newport, pay Real Estate Taxes and late fees, we can try to move on to another great Ski Season like last!

  • Pete Novick

    Yikes!

    Didn’t these investors also kick in an extra 10% administrative fee, ($50,000), with their $500,000 investments? Is this fee refunded as part of the deal offered by the receiver?

    https://vtdigger.org/2017/02/13/more-eb-5-investors-allege-fraud-sending-claims-above-30m/

    Lastly, here’s a link to the Agency of Commerce website on the EB-5 program. Sadly, that oversight, so convincingly offered, was in short supply in the halls of power in Montpelier.

    Here’s my personal favorite statement from the webpage:

    “State Oversight — VRC monitors all Vermont EB-5 projects for compliance with USCIS EB-5 regulations and policy guidance. This partnership reaffirms Vermont’s dedication to first-rate regulation and exceptional oversight in all aspects of financial services.”

    http://accd.vermont.gov/economic-development/programs/eb5

    What could possibly go wrong?