Burlington announces plans for $500,000 for low-income child care

Miro Weinberger

Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger with Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe (left) and nonprofit leaders. Photo by Morgan True / VTDigger

BURLINGTON — Mayor Miro Weinberger is hoping to put $500,000 toward increasing poor families’ access to child care and early childhood educational opportunities.

Weinberger was joined by Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe and nonprofit leaders to announce his intention to use a half-million dollars in payments from utilities for grants that will allow child care programs in the city to increase their offerings.

The focus will be increasing the number of slots available for newborns and toddlers, which experts say is a critical time for brain development.

“By investing in our youngest children today, we will reap a better educated, healthier and more just tomorrow,” the mayor said.

Officials highlighted disparities in access to quality child care tied to family income, which contributes to an “achievement gap” down the line between students from poor families and their wealthier counterparts.

Fifty percent of third-graders in Burlington who are eligible for free or reduced cost lunch read at grade level, versus 70 percent of those who are not eligible, according to a white paper written by consultant Jessica Nordhaus.

Research links quality child care to reduced K-12 school costs, higher lifetime earnings, lower rates of criminality and better health, according to speakers at Thursday’s news conference. The higher earnings accrue to both children who receive the early childhood care and to parents who, as a result, are able to re-enter the workforce.

Aly Richards, CEO of the Permanent Fund for Vermont’s Children, which made a $122,000 grant to Burlington in 2015 to develop an early learning initiative, said the challenges the city and the state face in making child care universally available are great. It is nonetheless her organization’s aim to realize that goal by 2025.

Eighty percent of infants and toddlers in Vermont lack access to quality early childhood educational opportunities, Richards said. In Burlington, that figure is 85 percent, she added.

Families in Vermont that do have access to child care pay 40 percent of their household income toward that care, while at the same time, the average child care worker makes $25,000 annually, according to Richards.

“There’s a lot of rhetoric about putting kids first,” said Kyle Dodson, executive director of the Burlington YMCA, a child care provider, “This is an opportunity to put our money where our mouth is.”

Weinberger said that details of the grant program are still being worked out, but money would only go to child care programs that receive four or five starts from a state ranking system, or those with “a clear plan to achieve” at least four stars.

Further, only families at 200 percent of the federal poverty line will be eligible for grant-funded slots in child care programs. Using 2017 guidelines, that equates to a family of four making $48,600 or less.

The $500,000 in capacity grants for child care programs is included in Weinberger’s proposed fiscal year 2018 budget, which the City Council will consider in June.

The money comes from payments in lieu of taxes made by utilities that operate in the city. Those are annual payments, making them a funding source that can be dedicated to Burlington’s early learning initiative, Weinberger said. The mayor added that he’s hopeful the city’s commitment will help leverage additional public and private money to boost the low-income child care program.

The utility payments were previously split between the city and the school district — with $1.4 million going to the schools — but in 2014, the state decided that practice ran afoul of rules preventing municipal revenue from going toward educational expenses.

The city still provides $400,000 of that money to the school district, which uses it for non-education related expenses. Another $500,000 goes toward youth programs at the Fletcher Free Library, the Parks and Recreation Department and for school resource officers through the Burlington Police Department.

The other $500,000, which will now be used for the early learning initiative, was previously being used to stabilize the city’s finances, Weinberger said, and it is part of the reason the city now has a $6 million surplus.

Correction: Aly Richards is the CEO of the Permanent Fund for Vermont’s Children.

Morgan True

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Let me see.. “..access to quality child care tied to family income, which contributes to
    an “achievement gap” down the line between students from poor families
    and their wealthier counterparts. So… it sounds as if family income is the problem. Why isn’t family income being addressed? Why is family income a problem? What are the causes of “low” family income and what are the causes for “wealthier counterparts?

    • Neil Johnson

      Why are people who can’t afford to pay for themselves having multiple kids? In Vermont your standard of living increases for doing this. You are rewarded for not being responsible. Then you have a “benefits cliff”, because Vermont does so much it doesn’t pay to get off the benefits.

      Yet the problems are getting more widespread and worse. So how’s that plan of ours working?

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Burlington announces plans for $500,000 for low-income child care"