Advocates suggest ways to end ‘unnecessary’ incarceration

Suzi Wizowaty

Suzi Wizowaty, executive director of Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform, speaks at a news conference Wednesday. Photo by Elizabeth Hewitt/VTDigger

Advocates say Vermont could end its use of private prisons by making policy changes that would reduce the number of people the state puts behind bars.

Vermonters for Criminal Justice Reform identified five policy areas where it says changes would be effective.

“This is not just a (Department of Corrections) problem, or a legislative problem or a judicial problem,” Suzi Wizowaty, the group’s executive director, said at a news conference Wednesday at the Statehouse. “This is a problem for all of us.”

Currently, some 260 Vermont inmates are held in a facility run by a private prison corporation in Michigan, but the company has said it won’t extend the contract ending in June. The criminal justice reform group says that by implementing even some of its proposals, the state would reduce the prison population enough that it wouldn’t need the out-of-state program.

“By working together we can contribute to this effort and end unnecessary incarceration starting now,” Wizowaty said.

The proposals include removing a requirement for DOC approval of housing for offenders as they are leaving prison. In recent months, the number of people being held only because they lack an approved place to live in the community has ranged between 150 and 170, according to the department.

The group also suggests making it easier for older inmates to be released on parole, eliminating monetary bail so that people are not incarcerated because they cannot afford to pay, and reforming policies so that minor violations of conditions of release do not result in returning to prison.

Another proposal would be to use alternatives to prison for people convicted of crimes that are not violent.

More than half a decade ago Maghon Luman served a seven-month prison sentence for a nonviolent offense.

She said she still feels the impact of that conviction.

“I cannot chaperone my daughter’s field trips,” Luman said. “She’s 9, and that’s something that she doesn’t understand, and I don’t think there’s a way really to explain that to a 9-year-old.”

Luman said Vermont should stop sending people to prison for nonviolent offenses. Instead, she advocates restorative justice services within the community.

“I think any nonviolent offender should have that option versus incarceration,” Luman said.

Mitzi Johnson

House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero. File photo by Erin Mansfield/VTDigger

Several lawmakers and officials attended the news conference. Though not all speakers backed all of the group’s specific proposals, they said they support the goal of reducing incarceration.

House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero, said that with a tight budget, lawmakers are looking to reduce unnecessary spending, “including the cost of locking people up who don’t really need it, those who are not a threat to public safety.”

She supported efforts to move away from using an out-of-state prison for Vermonters, saying the practice is a burden to inmates’ families and makes it more challenging for offenders when they return to the community. Lower rates of incarceration would also benefit the state, she said.

“Reducing unnecessary incarceration makes our state safer in the longer run,” Johnson said.

Attorney General TJ Donovan also spoke in support of alternatives to incarceration and said he is in favor of moving away from the out-of-state prison practice.

“Restorative justice, not just punitive justice, is an avenue to reduce incarceration, to build community infrastructure, to give people hope and opportunity, to become law-abiding citizens,” Donovan said. “That is public safety.”

However, he said ending the private prison contract is not a simple matter of choosing whether to sign the contract. To effectively end that program, he said, the state needs to take more steps to reform the criminal justice system.

Elizabeth Hewitt

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Dave Bellini

    The legislature has stated that it wants to end the out of state private prison contract and return Vermont inmates back to Vermont. So, the strategy is to close one of the Vermont prisons…??? Oh yeah, i get it. That will ease overcrowding too. Shrewd. And they seek to close the community high school of VT and cut a voc rehab counselor. That must be to help with programming and rehabilitation? Brilliant….

  • Ned Pike

    Ah, so who should be incarcerated should be determined not by the crime they committed, but by the State Corrections budget and the number of available slots in VT facilities. Does the public get any input as to who is kept in prison and who is cut free?

    Should that become a bill and then law, the signed copy MUST be made available for download just so that we of common sense can wave it in the face of the advocates when the ugly and fatal recidivism incident happens.

    Oh, and Ms. Luman? Actions have permanent consequences. Period.

  • Rich Lachapelle

    Agreed, private prisons have never been a good idea for a host of reasons. As with the military, border enforcement and police, “corrections” should always remain under the purview of government and therefore subject to Constitutional oversight.

    However, with plea bargaining and the overall leniency of the Vermont criminal justice system, just because someone does not have a conviction for a crime of violence, doesn’t mean they are not a threat to public safety. Serious DUI offenders and large scale peddlers of lethal opioids are not considered “violent”. Under this proposal will they be be exempt from incarceration despite the trail of dead bodies they leave in their wake?

  • Edward Letourneau

    Why do criminals want the rest of us to feel sorry for them? If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime. Teach it and pass it on.

  • Barry Kade

    The irony is that most of those presently at the Michigan GEO Group prison would rather be there than returned to the pettiness and harassment by the DOC. The Vermont DOC has 2 major faults: 1) It’s practices are not rehabilitative, but rather induce anger and frustration; 2) It does not know how to manage the system so as to get offenders out at or near their minimums.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Advocates suggest ways to end ‘unnecessary’ incarceration"