Environment

State wants to protect rare black gum swamp in Vernon

VERNON – With its thick layer of peat, drooping ferns and twisted black gum trees purported to be hundreds of years old, some say walking into Vernon’s Black Gum Swamp is like a taking a trip back in time.

State officials want to make sure it stays that way.

The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation is laying the groundwork for making Black Gum Swamp a “Class 1” wetland, giving it the most stringent preservation and protection standards available. Only three other wetlands in the state carry that label.

Black Gum Swamp
A sign points visitors to the Black Gum Swamp in Vernon. State officials want to make the swamp a Class 1 wetland, a protective label currently held by only three other sites in Vermont. Photo by Mike Faher/VTDigger

The designation has earned support from Vernon town officials, who already had enacted a plan limiting vehicle access and discouraging logging in the vicinity of the swamp and its rare trees.

“We believe that the Black Gum Swamp is exceptional and irreplaceable in its contribution to Vermont’s natural heritage and therefore merits the highest level of protection,” Vernon Selectboard members wrote in a recent letter to the state.

Black Gum Swamp is actually a series of swampy areas described by the state as a “wetland complex” covering a combined 41 acres. It lies mostly within the J. Maynard Miller Town Forest, though some of the swamp also is situated within the adjacent, state-maintained Roaring Brook Wildlife Management Area.

Advocates for protecting the area offer a long list of attributes: The forest floor, featuring moss and peat that’s been measured 11 feet deep in spots, boasts at least five rare, threatened and endangered plants and two uncommon plant species.

The swamp hosts at least 54 species of birds, according to Department of Environmental Conservation’s Watershed Management Division. It’s also home to multiple species of amphibians and three species of bat, and it provides habitat suitable for beaver, black bear and wood duck.

Officials also tout the site’s floodwater-storage and erosion-control capacities.

The swamp’s crown jewels, however, are its black gum trees. While not uncommon in more-southern climes, black gums are rare this far north; their presence in Vernon is “a remnant from the past, when the climate was warmer – approximately 3,000 to 5,000 years ago,” state officials say.

In this part of the country, “they’re really, really rare,” said Lynn Levine, a Dummerston-based forester and educator. “That whole concept – just the rareness of it is incredible.”

“There’s no question that there’s educational value in looking at a tree that’s so different from other trees,” Levine added.

Town and state documents claim that some of the swamp’s black gums are more than 400 years old. That speaks both to the uniqueness of the trees and also to the fact that Black Gum Swamp has gone largely untouched in recent history.

Vernon’s town plan makes note of the swamp’s fragility. The document cites several scenarios that could inflict harm on the site’s prized trees including severe winters or windstorms; logging or off-road vehicle activity; and even overuse by “well-meaning visitors.”

The plan offers provisions for “preventing sudden environmental changes around the swamps,” including limiting vehicle access. Vernon officials also encourage sound forest management practices and “shall discourage any tree-cutting within a 300-foot radius of the swamp,” the plan says.

Laura Lapierre, who manages the state’s Wetlands Program, said Vernon residents “have been really great stewards for these wetlands.”

Now, state officials want to take that stewardship to a new level by applying the Class 1 wetland designation. State documents supporting the change sum up the site’s ecological value this way: “The function and values the Vernon Black Gum Swamp provides would be difficult or impossible to restore should impacts to it occur.”

Recreational uses like Vernon’s town-maintained trails in the area would not be impacted by the new label. But Class 1 protection would mean a wider barrier for potentially harmful activities, including any sort of development or land modification.

“For this wetland, we’re looking at a 300-foot buffer zone,” Lapierre said. “Currently, these wetlands are considered Class 2 and have a 50-foot buffer zone.”

Theoretically, permits are available for development that would impact a Class 1 wetland or its buffer. But documents say such a project would be unlikely, since the state issues such permits only “to meet a compelling public need to support public health or safety.”

“It’s a really high bar,” Lapierre said.

Failing to heed state wetland protections could get expensive. The state can levy a fine of up to $42,500 for the first violation of an environmental regulation, then can tack on another $17,000 per day for continuing violations.

The state’s maximum fine doesn’t rise for a Class 1 wetland. But officials say they consider a violation’s “degree of detriment” when determining fines, so a violation in a Class 1 area might be deemed more detrimental and worthy of a stiffer penalty.

If Black Gum Swamp receives a Class 1 label, it would join three other such wetlands in Vermont. They are Dorset Marsh in Bennington County, North Shore Wetland in Chittenden County and Tinmouth Channel Wetland in Rutland County.

But changing the Vernon property’s status could take some time. The process involves contacting landowners and other affected parties; filing for a rule change; and setting up a public comment period.

Though the Vermont Wetlands Program can propose the change, it’s ultimately up to the state Legislature to approve it.

If you read us, please support us.

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer.

We moderate every comment. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

Mike Faher

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State wants to protect rare black gum swamp in Vernon"
  • scott jennings

    Having been there I can say it is a remarkable place and I hope it’s preserved. Funny, isn’t it though, that state officials admit it was warmer in Vermont 3,000 to 5,000 years ago? I’m sure said state officials will be reprimanded for accidently admitting the scientific truth that the earth’s climate in cyclical and global temperatures have risen far more in the earth’s past history. Unfortunately the dems can exploit climate change hysteria to the uneducated masses to keep their false narrative alive.

    “The swamp’s crown jewels, however, are its black gum trees. While not uncommon in more-southern climes, black gums are rare this far north; their presence in Vernon is “a remnant from the past, when the climate was warmer – approximately 3,000 to 5,000 years ago,” state officials say.”

    • Christopher Daniels

      yes, some state wetland officials, with a casual statement on black gum trees, have just refuted the work of thousands of scientists across the globe. When informed that the gig was up, scientists scientists were stunned that they could be tripped up so easily.

      • chris kayes

        Just by glancing at the paleological record, even a 5th grader could see it was warmer in the past. All the current “warmest years” are calculated starting from the 19th century records, go back a few thousand years, it was warmer and yes, the scientists are aware of that. They still don’t know why…

    • Your response on climate change is interesting because it reveals some of the scale confusion involved in the climate change debate.

      Our concern with Anthropogenic climate change is that we’re seeing — and predicting — rapid changed in climate: over the span of one or two human generations. The fact that there are also climate changes that cycle over the course of 3-5 millenia (in your observation) or hundreds of millenia, is pretty much irrelevant to the concerns of my granchildren, or yours…

      Nor, for that matter, are the 3-5 millenia cycles relevant to the planning and strategies of the remaining farmers in southern Vermont, for whom rapid climate change is a clear reality.

  • Brian Tokar

    Is this area connected to waterways that would likely have been impacted by radioactivity from Vermont Yankee? That would be a serious concern, I’d think.

  • I remember visiting this swamp with my grandmother, Beatrice Taylor Ward, some years after she took up residence at the Vernon Green retirement home. She loved having discovered this little ecological oddity for herself, and treasured her ability to visit it.

    It was one of the really significant stage changes in her life when, at about 80 years, she discovered she could no longer manage to walk to the swamp on her own.

    Born nearby, in Halifax 1913, she passed away in 2014, 21 years after she first had to turn back from her hike to the black gum swamp. She would have been happy to hear the state was working to preserve one of her favorite places in Vernon.

  • Jane Palmer

    I wish I had the confidence in ANR enough to know that the swamp will be protected more once its in “state’s custody” than if it were taken care of by those who the state admits are already doing a great job. So many times I hear about how ANR allows destruction of wetlands for projects that large corporations are building or that the governor favors.

  • William Hays

    Better hurry! Sounds like an ideal site for wind generators and solar panels! Don’t tell Shumlin and Blittersdorf! Iberdrola/Avangrid would love a site so close to VTY’s under-utilized electrical transmission grid, to send power to MA and CT.