Federal data: Vermonters spend more than national average on food, gas, health care

New data released last week by the federal government provides some insight into where Vermonters spend their money, but take the numbers with a grain of salt, two economists said.

Flickr photo by Jessica Mullen

Flickr photo by Jessica Mullen

The Bureau of Economic Analysis released data about "personal consumption expenditures," a measure of how people spend their money on goods and services in the U.S. economy.

Vermonters spend more than the national average on food, gasoline and health care, but about average on housing and utilities, the data shows. Total personal consumption expenditures in Vermont are also higher than the national average, though lower than the average in New England.

Personal consumption expenditures account for about two-thirds of domestic final spending, making them the primary engine that drives future economic growth, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

However, there are several reasons economists do not turn often to these figures, warned Tom Kavet, the Legislature’s consulting economist.

The data released this week for the first time is state-specific, but the most recent year released is 2012, making them not very useful for economists who want to know what’s happening today.

It is also a conceptual estimate, and the state can get more accurate numbers from local sources, Kavet said.

The Vermont data also does a poor job separating out spending by out-of-staters passing through the state. While the data adjusts other states’ numbers for tourists, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine’s are not, Kavet said.

The numbers can be useful to compare states or examine per-capita spending in categories such as health care that do not include much spending by visitors, but are less useful when looking at areas like recreation.

Nationwide, housing and utility spending varied nearly $8,000, and health care spending varied $6,000.

UVM economist Art Woolf said the numbers are still useful to estimate how Vermonters spend their income among different categories, such as food, gasoline and housing.

Like any piece of data, the numbers are just one “little piece of the jigsaw puzzle that you call the state economy,” he said. It is important to find other data that back up numbers from any one report, both economists said.

The fact that Vermont spends more than the national average on living expenses like groceries is in part due to the fact there is little competition in the state and a lack of big stores like Wal-Mart, which offer cheaper prices and also drive competitors to lower their prices.

Vermont was among the highest in the nation in 2012 in per-capita expenditures for food and beverages purchased for off-premises consumption (groceries), ranking just behind Alaska at $3,622.

Per capital personal consumption expenditures (2012)

Per capital personal consumption expenditures (2012)

Want to stay on top of the latest business news? Sign up here to get a weekly email on all of VTDigger's reporting on local companies and economic trends. And check out our new Business section here.


Laura Krantz

About Laura

Laura Krantz is VTDigger's criminal justice and corrections reporter. She moved to VTDigger in January 2014 from MetroWest Daily, a Gatehouse Media newspaper based in Framingham, Mass. She won the 2013 Morley Piper First Amendment Award from the New England Newspaper and Press Association for her investigation of the Ashland Police Department. She is skilled in the use of public records to find the real story. She is a 2010 graduate of Boston University, where she studied comparative religion.


Follow Laura on Twitter @laurakrantz

Send us your thoughts

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.


Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Federal data: Vermonters spend more than national average on food, ga..."
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.