UVM tells Sodexo to hold off on employment status changes

The University of Vermont is telling food service giant Sodexo not to proceed with plans to redefine employment status for its UVM workers.

UVM President Tom Sullivan said Friday that the university’s 320 food service workers will see no change in their employment status “until further notice” as UVM looks into the effect on workers’ health care benefits.

Sodexo in September announced that it was redefining full-time employment as an average of 30 hours per week over the course of a year. Some UVM food service employees were concerned that the reclassification might disqualify them from benefits because they work fewer hours in the summer.

Sodexo said in September that it was making the change in response to the federal Affordable Care Act.

In Friday’s memo to the UVM community, Sullivan said the order to delay the Sodexo changes was based on the following factors:

• A very tight timeframe from the date of notification for employees to consider health care options;

• The challenges of accessing accurate and timely information on which to assess available health care options, including enrollment procedures under the Federal Affordable Care Act;

• Uncertainties regarding how soon current health care implementation problems will be resolved;

• The university’s obligation to complete its review of the proposed changes under the contract with Sodexo, including the impact those changes may have for Sodexo employees;

• The timing of the upcoming request for proposal process for dining services that will begin in early 2014 for a new contract beginning July 1, 2015, given that the present contract with Sodexo ends on June 30, 2015.

Sullivan said Sodexo is working with employees to help them understand the changes and their options under the new health care law.

UVM’s faculty applauded Sullivan’s decision Friday.

“We thank President Sullivan for his leadership on this issue, and we hope that he will continue to stand with the Sodexo workers, as they are part of our UVM family,” Denise Youngblood, president of the faculty union, United Academics, said in a statement. “We appreciate the response to our request to not approve the contract, through a petition signed by hundreds of faculty and staff.”

United Academics and the Vermont Fair Food Campaign spearheaded a petition drive at UVM, and the signatures were delivered to Sullivan this week, a news release said.

The release also said the Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation plans to deliver a similar petition to VSC trustees.

Tom Brown

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Keith Stern

    Obamacare: Our payers have been answered!
    Completely messing up the healthcare system to help around 10 million people? This shows just how clueless and irresponsible the Democratic party is. Instead of helping those people they decided to hurt others in order to help them.

    • Sandra Bettis

      actually, it’s 45 million people.

      • Keith Stern

        Actually it’s not. Most don’t have insurance because they choose not to and they will pay the fine rather than buy insurance anyway.

        • Sandra Bettis

          actually, it is. who would choose not to have ins if they could afford it????

          • Keith Stern

            Seriously? How many young people think they are invincible and don’t need it? I was probably around 40 before I decided it was time to buy it. It worked out well for me.
            Now since one can pick it up whenever I would advice young people to wait until they had a serious problem before they get it.

  • Sandra Bettis


Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "UVM tells Sodexo to hold off on employment status changes"