Tax Department prepares for TransCanada property disputes

The Tax Department is asking state lawmakers for an extra $150,000 to prepare for potential litigation by TransCanada against five towns on the Connecticut River, where the hydroelectric giant is disputing 2010 state property valuations.

Tax Commissioner Mary Peterson explained to the House Appropriations Committee that the extra funds would go to defend a 2010 statewide appraisal of the dams, which cost $200,000. If necessary, the funds would cover the expenses of expert witnesses in court.

If the dams are overvalued, TransCanada will pay a higher and unjustified level of property tax. If the dams are undervalued, these five towns and the state will lose out on deserved property tax revenue.

Peterson said the contingency planning wasn’t particularly unexpected, because “utility appraisals are just complex. Their incomes are based on what the markets are doing at any given time.”

The department’s director of property valuation, Bill Johnson, said that the maximum potential loss to the state stands at $4.3 million in total, on the highly unlikely assumption that the value of all five dams drops to zero.

It’s too early to tell how much the state would realistically lose, since it’s unclear how much of a devaluation of their dams TransCanada is asking for, Johnson said.

The Tax Department prefers to negotiate settlements between TransCanada and the towns, Johnson said, because if TransCanada prevails in the courts, it could move forward to dispute property valuations in 21 other towns in Vermont where it owns property.

“I suspect that if they got reductions in most or all of these [five] towns, they’d probably look for similar types of reductions in lots of the other towns that have TransCanada properties,” said Johnson.

The company has successfully fought utility appraisals in court before, in Concord in 2009. It disputed the valuation of the Bellows Fall dam last summer.

Litigation costs are likely to be borne mostly by the towns, which would probably be the primary defendants in any suit. The state wants to aid towns in shouldering those expenses, if need be.

The five towns where TransCanada has appealed property valuations in local superior courts are Waterford, Barnet, Newbury, Rockingham and Vernon. The $150,000 being requested would come from the state’s education fund.

Nat Rudarakanchana

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Jim Barrett

    $150,000.00 from the education fund, what does that fund have to do with dams? Just like the transportation fund which has been robbed over and over again and now the legislature is looking at raising taxes to cover those loses. They are blaming you for the lower income because you bought cars that had better gas milage…….thank you for helping !!!!!

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Tax Department prepares for TransCanada property disputes"