New Vermont State Hospital could cost $38 million — $10 million more than originally proposed

BISHCA Commissioner Steve Kimbell. VTD/Josh Larkin

BISHCA Commissioner Steve Kimbell. VTD/Josh Larkin

State officials planning the new psychiatric hospital in Berlin are preparing for a “worst-case scenario,” which would cost the state and taxpayers roughly $38 million — $10 million more than originally projected.

Officials from the Department of Mental Health and the Department of Building and General Services submitted the hospital’s financing plan to the Department of Financial Regulation at a Friday public hearing in Montpelier.

Steve Kimbell, commissioner of financial regulation, issued a certificate of need for the plan on Monday.

The 25-bed in-patient facility will partially replace the Vermont State Hospital in Waterbury that was ruined by floodwaters from Tropical Storm Irene more than a year ago.

The Shumlin administration’s new community-based mental health system for the highest need psychiatric patients in Vermont was approved by lawmakers last legislative session. In addition to the 25 beds slated for Berlin, the Brattleboro Retreat is scheduled to provide care for 14 “level one” patients with serious needs and the Rutland Regional Medical Center will offer another six beds.

The 45 beds that will be made available in Berlin, Brattleboro and Rutland facilities will replace the former 54-bed Waterbury facility, which officials said had 51 patients when it was inundated by floodwaters.

The financing plan that officials unveiled on Friday showed funding from one source: State bonds at an interest rate of 3.4 percent. Officials said they have to prepare for this contingency, as the state currently has no insurance reimbursements in hand for the former state hospital and no funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

This fiscal arrangement would drive the cost of the project up from roughly $28 million to $38 million. The additional $10 million would be for debt financing expenses, including interest and bank fees, according to Kimbell.

Judy Rosenstreich, senior policy adviser to the Vermont Department of Health, told Kimbell and other financial regulators on Friday that the state expects to hear from FEMA in January.

“Do you have any idea what the FEMA contribution will be?” Clifford Peterson, general counsel to the regulatory department, asked Rosenstreich.

“No, we do not have any specific figure,” she said.

Mike Kuhn of Buildings and General Services explained how the costs break down and how difficult it has been dealing with FEMA.

“The cost figures you have before you are a worst case scenario, assuming all of the funds come from the capital construction budget,” he said. “Anything that we receive from the insurance company … as well as funds from FEMA … will only go to reduce the cost for the state’s general obligation funds.

“We have been working very closely with FEMA … to maximize our reimbursement funds from FEMA, and it’s a struggle,” he added.

The Shumlin administration has maintained that the Brooks building, where the Vermont State Hospital was housed in the Waterbury State Office Complex, was destroyed. FEMA officials have said the structure was damaged. In order to qualify for public assistance and a 90 percent reimbursement level, the state needs to show the building was destroyed. The federal agency reimburses based on replacement value.

Kuhn expects to break ground on the facility in December and finish by January 2014. Bids for the project and the demolition of five structures on the property are out, and he expects to complete the permitting process by the end of November. He said the project still needs permits from the Agency of Natural Resources and a conditional use permit from the Berlin Development Review Board, which it will meet with on Tuesday.

Kimbell, who signed the certificate of need on Monday, explained why the project was fiscally sound.

“Even if it doesn’t have funding from (FEMA and insurance), it has the financial wherewithal to be complete,” he said last Friday after the hearing. “From my standpoint, the question is not do they have the financial resources to complete the project, it’s just a question of where it’s coming from.”

Andrew Stein

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Cheryl Pariseau

    While I understand the need for a state psychiatric hospital this cost seems extremely inflated. For a 24 bed hospital at 38 million is almost 1.6 million per bed. It would see that these types of funds could be put to better use to help the mentally ill in this state. I guess if it’s not your money then it doesn’t matter how much it cost. This seems like a large amount of money for little in return.

  • John Wagner

    This is yet another example of where the Shumlin administration is more interested in “creating jobs” in the construction field; removing valuable property from the property tax roles; and narrow minded “projects” at the taxpayers’ expense that only helps (as the other poster said) a handful of individuals.

    I too agree that this proposed money could be better spent elsewhere either in the mental health area which is badly needed or elsewhere!

  • Curtis Sinclair

    We can the VSEA for pressuring the legislature into building another hospital. They actually wanted a 70 bed hospital. They only care about keeping as many dues paying state employees as they can. They don’t care about the mental health of people or how much taxpayer money gets wasted.

  • Nick Davlantes

    Let me guess Dubois Construction, Lt. Govs. Phil Scott’s company has much site work on the table. No FEMA money because the negotiators are incompetent. This “hospital” is for the criminally insane being located next to a mall, and a residence. How much is the state paying Henry Lague for the land and what terms. Maybe more than we’ll ever know.

  • Jim Barrett

    The cost figures out to be well over ONE MILLION PER BED……..what in the World could possibly cause this huge expense ? Who cares?

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "New Vermont State Hospital could cost $38 million — $10 million mor..."