Protesters throng to Statehouse lawn in opposition of industrial wind

Anti-wind protesters gather outside the Vermont Statehouse. Photo by Andrew Stein.

Anti-wind protesters gather outside the Vermont Statehouse. Photo by Andrew Stein.

Nearly 200 protesters from across the state descended on Montpelier Friday to call for a moratorium on industrial, mountaintop wind development.

The activists, many of whom are personally affected by proposed projects or wind turbines that have already been constructed, gathered on the Statehouse lawn to vent their frustrations. Over the course of an hour about 10 people spoke. The protesters said they felt they had no say in the process, they said they were concerned about a lack of investigation into the potential environmental effects of the turbines on the state’s ridgelines and a lack of respect for town policies.

At intervals the whole crowd would shout out words like “shame,” “greed” or “Shamlin” to deride Gov. Peter Shumlin’s support of industrial wind.

With beating drums and anti-wind signs held high, the protest culminated with the issuance of a “Certificate of Public Harm” to Shumlin, his administration, 11 wind developers and other government bodies. The symbolic “certificate” is a send-up of the Public Service Board’s certificate of public good, which is a required permit for certain energy developments.

Issued “by the People of the State of Vermont,” the certificate accuses the aforementioned entities of violating “Vermont’s environmental, social, and economic well-being,” and it cites examples of how they have done so. The document, which can be viewed below, points to issues with particular wind projects across the state, such as the Georgia Mountain Community Wind project, Lowell’s Kingdom Community Wind and the Northfield Ridge project.

An anti-wind protester holds a sign outside the Vermont Statehouse. Photo by Andrew Stein.

Last week, Shumlin issued an executive order to form a five-member commission with the purpose of looking at how public participation can be improved in the energy permitting process and how that process can be streamlined. While some protesters called on the Shumlin administration and the Public Service Board to halt permitting wind projects until the commission has made recommendations, others called for a permanent moratorium.

Lukas Snelling, director of the renewable energy advocacy group Energize Vermont and grandson of the late Gov. Richard Snelling, kicked off the rally on Friday.

“We’re here today to send a message to the Public Service Board and Gov. Shumlin and his administration that we do not agree with their support of utility scale wind on our ridgelines,” he said. “We are a group of Vermonters that have seen the impacts of utility-scale wind in our communities. We have seen that … it causes massive destruction to our natural resources. And worst of all, it divides our communities.”

Other Vermonters — like former Fish and Wildlife Department Commissioner Steve Wright and the Brighton Ridge Protectors, a group opposing the Seneca Mountain Wind project — echoed similar sentiments.

Fourth-generation Vermonter Allen Mills criticized Manchester-based Reunion Power and the turbine manufacturer Nordex USA, Inc for their proposed, 20-turbine project on Grandpa’s Knob ridgeline in Rutland County.

“Nordex and Reunion Power are modern-day carpetbaggers descending like vultures on financially stressed towns in Vermont,” said Mills. “They try to take advantage of these towns, and they have because the federal government and specifically Gov. Shumlin make laws and policies tailored directly to them.”

Randy Brock, the Republican gubernatorial candidate who opposes the projects and the way they are permitted, was also in attendance at the rally.

“What I, among others in the Senate, have proposed is a moratorium on industrial wind,” he said in an interview. “I think there are so many unanswered questions, and as these projects are developed I think we need to have both the administration and the Legislature ask a lot more questions, take more testimony and listen to people.

“This isn’t going to do anything for us in terms of removing an addiction to oil and coal,” Brock continued. “You’re not going to close any oil or coal fire plants with the addition of industrial wind. And our mountaintops are not renewable — pure and simple.”

After the protest, Elizabeth Miller, commissioner of the Department of Public Service, spoke to VTDigger about the event.

“I think protests generally are something Vermonters use to express their opinion, and we’re in support of Vermonters expressing their opinion when it comes to renewable energy,” she said. “The governor, the administration and I are in support of renewable energy, and we want to see it succeed, and to do that it needs public approval. I understand there are Vermonters who are concerned, and of course that’s something we’re listening to.”

When asked about the permitting process, she said that she thinks it is sufficient but it’s worth evaluating whether it needs to be improved.

“I believe the process we have in Vermont now is thorough and there are a lot of Vermonters who are in support of these renewable energy projects,” she said. “That doesn’t mean we’re not willing to look at the process and re-evaluate it. That’s why we created this siting commission.”

Andrew Stein

Leave a Reply

25 Comments on "Protesters throng to Statehouse lawn in opposition of industrial wind"


Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
4 years 3 months ago
Andrew, People are finally waking up. The only way to stop utility-scale wind energy is to vote promotors out of office Being agaist wind turbines on ridge lines is great, but we need to be FOR something. It would be much wiser, and more economical, to shift subsidies away from expensive renewables, that produce just a little of expensive, variable, intermittent energy, towards increased EE. Those renewables would not be needed, if the funds are used for increased EE.  In New England stormwater management begins by not disturbing the ridge lines, as envisioned by Act 250. Clearing thousands of acres… Read more »
Alice Allen
4 years 3 months ago

YES! YES! YES! To the comments by Willem Post! ENERGY EFFICIENCY IS THE ROUTE TO FOLLOW! Not just talking about doing EE but actually DOING it and making it PRIORITY ONE! This is also ENERGY CONSERVATION! CONSERVATION!!!! Remember that concept? THANK YOU to Willem Post for making this so clear! THANK YOU!

George Plumb
4 years 3 months ago
As one who is not being directly affected by industrial wind it was heart breaking to hear the sad stories by many people from all the different communities whose lives are being “sacrificed” by these massive installations. It is amazing that VNRC, VPIRG, and CLF have not joined the effort to call for a moratorium on any new installations until we better understand the impacts of those that have already been installed. Never mind the environmental science and economic facts, compassion alone should be enough to call for a moratorium. I can’t help but wonder if any of those CEO’s… Read more »
4 years 3 months ago
Yesterday, while people from all over Vermont rallied in Montpelier to give Gov. Shumlin a Certificate of Public Harm because of his support for industrial wind Gov. Shumlin was in Middlebury listening to His Holiness the Dalai Lama speak The Dalai Lama’s message is that we must engage in dialogue, and have concern of other’s well-being, show compassionate gratitude. He said patience, compassion, these are signs of strength, signs of self confidence. Tolerance, forgiveness, these are signs of strength entirely based on concern of other’s well-being. I hope Gov. Shumlin heard the Dalai Lama, and will now be willing to… Read more »
Rob Roy Macgregor
4 years 3 months ago
So, do those residents of coal states where entire mountains are blown up get any dialogue or compassion? People living downstream of fly ash slurry ponds, or in the mercury hot spots around plants where the coal is burned? The thousands and thousands of people who suffer asthma conditions as a result of burning coal? Do people living in proximity to hydro-fracked gas wells get any consideration, or the people living next to large scale LNG loading and storage facilities, or those people living in coastal areas affected by oil spills, or in the vicinity of inland pipeline construction or… Read more »
Kathy Leonard
4 years 3 months ago
George I like your depiction of our “outer circle.” I am flabbergasted at VTs environmental “inner circle” disregarding mountain ecosystems as they are dismembered by big wind. Each summer I’ve welcomed VPIRGs summer intern with refreshment, good dialog and a check – but this year as soon as I raised the topic of wind I was met with anger and a closed mind. My thanks for being a long time supporter? So, one foot in front of another in support of our mountains and their inhabitants. Mindfulness is more powerful than political correctness, as the Dalai Lama understands intrinsically.
Peter Romans
4 years 3 months ago

VPIRG, CLF, Shumlin, etc find sound-bites more effective than data at raising money. Data bores most folks. Willem Post is incorrigible in producing scientific information on energy issues. Thanks and please continue.

4 years 3 months ago
George, ” It is amazing that VNRC, VPIRG, and CLF have not joined the effort to call for a moratorium on any new installations until we better understand the impacts of those that have already been installed.” Amazing? The Vermont and foreign RE oligarchies provide payments and “expert” advice to these entities to help them “get the word out” (RE rah-rah), prepare reports (such as that garbage report by VPIRG on Vermont’s Energy Future about 3 years ago), hold rallies, etc., in favor of ridge line destruction, a.k.a. variable, intermittent wind energy that is 2-3 times grid prices (i.e., expensive),… Read more »
Alan Upham
4 years 3 months ago

Wind power can be a great benefit for all if the technology is used correctly. These big industrial wind companies are just tapping into the subsidies to fill their pockets and when the systems fail in their big towers they will bail out and leave the mess for the taxpayers to clean up.
There is better technology for wind and it is TMA Wind.
Check it out and see how they address the issues of wind power as we know it.

Daren Villemaire
4 years 3 months ago

looked at the TMA link above in the comment post and noticed that the range of production for the turbines are from 12 to 70 mph…….There are alot of days with wind speeds below 12mph around here. How bout the folks with the three quarter million dollar views on Lake Champlain offer up some space in front of their place on the open lake? Wouldn’t have to rape a ridgeline and as such drastically alter an entire ecosystem.

George Plumb
4 years 3 months ago

That’s highly inaccurate Roy. I was one of the early installers of an AllSun Tracker that now generates most of the electricity I use and even so I am checking into solar hot water. I’m sure all of the people there support local and community solar as well. But as Willem says its EE where we should be putting much of our resources.

Steve Comeau
4 years 3 months ago
Willem and George, The problem with EE is that works best when energy prices are high, which they really are not, so the potential impact is limited, low hanging fruit or not. Even so, Vermont does a pretty good job with EE, as it is keeping demand from increasing. People choose to use lots of energy, so it must be produced on a big industrial scale, and it is. Small scale renewables are like a home garden. Very nice to have as a hobby. Most of us need big agriculture and big energy to stay alive and live well. OK,… Read more »
4 years 3 months ago
Readers of this story may be interested in the documentary film we are producing called State of Green. We were at this event to cover it for our project. With our film, we are attempting to give voice to Vermonters as whole as they examine the renewable energy revolution. We intend to present all sides of the issues, providing a balanced look that we feel is lacking in the current environmental discourse. We believe that healthy and sustainable progress will only come from an intelligent discussion which is informed by all influencing factors. We have partnered with Catamount Film &… Read more »
4 years 3 months ago

Hi all-

I have collected the various pros and cons to the development of industrial wind that I’ve found here and elsewhere. I’ve created a discussion item on my site, which allows for people to weigh in on issues like this, as well as add more pros and cons. Take a look and vote on whether or not you think industrial-scale wind is a good idea:

Jeremy Hansen, Berlin

Randy Koch
4 years 3 months ago
Well, you never know, Roy: it doesn’t really seem like those advocating mega-scaled energy production have come up with a “realistic” solution either. It’s not pretty the picture you get when you stop asuming that whatever exists is inevitable. Nukes have had a few pesky little problems like the fact that they blow up and produce waste nobody knows how to get rid of. Huge hydro does chew up quite a lot of land, and they don’t seem to be manufacturing more of that. Gas by fracking has some annoying effects on water such as rendering it inflammable. The renewables… Read more »
Steve Comeau
4 years 3 months ago

The per-capita energy consumption in the US is 334 million BTUs. That needs to come form somewhere, and right now it is provided primarily (83%) by oil, gas, and coal. The replacement of using these finite resources with renewables and nuclear will likely be a decades long endeavor, which is now in the beginning stages. In seems that only with the deployment of renewables on a truly massive scale can there be any hope of significantly reducing the burning of fossil fuels.

krister adams
4 years 3 months ago

Randy: I must agree with several folks here including you and also Steve C. I am a strong advocate of energy efficiency, conservation and renewables. My home is quite tight and efficient, my car gets 34mpg, I compost, I recycle, I try and live simply. But I can’t afford solar (either hot water or photovoltaics (I looked in to it). Most Vermonter’s can’t. Coal is evil, etc., etc., etc. so what do we do for clean power? Wind has got to be an option.

George Plumb
4 years 3 months ago

What a wonderfully post Annette! There is a communication process called nonviolent communication widely used by some negotiators. It is in a book of the same name by Marshall Rosenberg. I introduced it to the communications director of one of our large environmental organization just a couple of days ago. Hopefully we can begin to use it more often.

Michael Colby
4 years 3 months ago

The mainstream environmental movement is little more than a liberal investment club at this point. They traded their passion for profits a long, long time ago. RIP: VPIRG.

Stanley Shapiro
4 years 3 months ago

Industrial Wind, the ‘abortion issue’ of the renewable energy community has illustrated how power works in the state of Vermont.The federal goverment through intense lobbying efforts has made these projects so lucrative that it is impossible for ‘the smartest guys in the room’ not to capitaltilize on this veritable gold rush.Vermonters for a Clean Environment and Energize Vermont are aptly advocating for the mountains, while VPIRG,VNRC, and CLF ,have become quisling organizations to the forests,fauna and flora of the pristine Green Mountains that are the very foundation that is Vermont.

George Plumb
4 years 3 months ago

Probably one of the last posts. I just want to thank you all so much for posting. It is so great to know that I am not alone in my thinking.

vtdigger is so wonderful because it offers those wihout any power the opportunity to express their opinion on an equal basis and in a timely fashion with those who do have power. Thank you again and again Anne for starting this outstanding medium.

Paul Kenyon
4 years 3 months ago
It would be interesting (and important) to learn exactly and comprehensively why Elizabeth Miller supports “renewables” in Vermont. Renewables, of course, include other technologies besides wind (and ecologically damaging field mounted PV solar) but since she was commenting on the wind protests, we must assume she means to support big wind. Wind, of course, is an (intermittent, variable, expensive, low quality, environmentally destructive and socially damaging) electrical energy source. The US does not use significant oil to generate electricity (1% or so) and, as Randy Brock said, will not usefully reduce human carbon emissions. I do not expect Miller’s response… Read more »
Paul Donovan
4 years 3 months ago
I think we’d be better off if we dropped the white-hot rhetoric and the conspiracy theories and remember who are allies are. I’m of the opinion that climate change will overwhelm these discussions (, and others) and we should be running, not walking, away from every carbon-based energy source and toward wind, EE, and yes, even nuclear (though I happen to think Vt Yankee should be shut down because it’s well beyond its design lifetime). We are running the real risk of jeopardizing the entire ecosystem while we engage in exchanges over who’s the worst person in the pro-wind camp.… Read more »
Barbara Durkin
4 years 1 month ago

Do you think a trillion dollar carbon tax will address your global warming as Al Gore does, Mr. Donovan?

Do you see the folly in large scale deployment of industrial machinery for the purposes of addressing harmful pollutants created by industrial machinery?

What about the favorable economics and aesthetics associated with trees, a cost effective carbon sink?

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Protesters throng to Statehouse lawn in opposition of industrial wind"