Health Care

Shumlin signs nation’s first single-payer health care bill into law

Peter Shumlin signed the historic health care reform act on the Statehouse steps on Thursday. VTD/Taylor Dobbs.
Peter Shumlin signed the historic health care reform act on the Statehouse steps on Thursday. VTD/Taylor Dobbs.
Editor’s note: Taylor Dobbs contributed to this report.

Gov. Peter Shumlin relished his biggest moment of triumph since he was elected in November by a narrow margin. On Wednesday, he signed a bill that he said will create “the first single payer system in America.”

Shumlin, flanked by dozens of supporters and Democratic lawmakers on the Statehouse steps, profusely thanked the advocates and legislators who helped to pass H.202, a bill that sets in motion the creation of a single-payer style health care system. More than 100 onlookers marked what several lawmakers called a historic moment.

“We gather here today to launch the first single payer system in America, to do in Vermont what has taken too long — to have a health care that is the best in the world that treats health care as a right and not a privilege, where health care follows the individual not the employer,” Shumlin said.

Read the final version of H.202.

Shumlin, a Democrat, campaigned on the creation of a single-payer plan that would contain rising health care costs, integrate the fractious medical system and guarantee universal access to medical care. With the enactment of H.202, the governor takes the first step toward realizing that campaign pledge. The Democratic majority in the Vermont House and Senate passed the bill in May.

The legislation sets up a framework for developing an implementation plan for Green Mountain Care, a universal, unified health care system. The bill creates a five-member board that will oversee the development of a benefits package, a reimbursement system for doctors and hospitals, and a financing system to support the universal health care plan. The law also contains provisions for Vermont’s federal insurance exchanges.

The governor described the single-payer system that has yet to be designed as “a huge jobs creator” that is “sustainable, that spends our health care dollars making Vermonters healthy not on insurance company profits and not on waste and inefficiency.”

The governor spelled out a vision in which health insurance coverage would be decoupled from employment and the financial burden now borne by employers would be lifted; in which providers who are having difficulty surviving in the current system are compensated fairly; and in which uninsured and underinsured Vermonters will have access to health care. The bill lays out a timeline for the implementation of the complicated plan over a three-year period. Though the Shumlin administration hopes to launch Green Mountain Care in 2014, it could be 2017 before the system is in place because of certain federal requirements.

“As a business person … I know firsthand that the biggest obstacle to job growth is the 10, 20, 30 percent increases in insurance premiums,” Shumlin said. “Where we as employers so badly want to cover our employees and consistently send more money to insurance companies for less and less coverage asking Vermonters our employees to pay more and more of their share in an unsustainable system that will both bankrupt us and make it impossible for our small rural providers who do such a great job providing quality care to survive in a small rural state.”

The governor pledged to “get this done in Vermont” despite daunting obstacles. A few of those roadblocks include intense opposition from prominent insurance companies, insurance brokers and some large employers (most notably IBM); skeptical doctors and hospital administrators; and requirements that the state obtain eight federal waivers before it implements Green Mountain Care.

Shumlin acknowledged that his administration “has a few challenges” and that H.202 is the beginning of a long, difficult odyssey no other state has undertaken, in which critics would attempt to undermine his administration’s efforts to create a single-payer system. The Shumlin administration also faces pressure from the activists who created a groundswell of grassroots support for single-payer. Some observers say advocates may demand health care benefit levels that could prove financially unsustainable.

The bill, Shumlin said, is for the 47,000 uninsured and 150,000 underinsured Vermonters “who know that if they get sick, as unfortunately we all do, that when that day comes, they may lose their house their car, their economic security because underinsurance is no insurance at all.”

“That’s what we need to fix,” Shumlin said. He described the bill as “both an opportunity and an obligation.”

After he finished his short speech, the governor served as emcee for the hourlong oratory prelude to the signing. Shumlin introduced a cancer survivor, activists and key lawmakers to the crowd, each of whom took a turn at the mic before the governor signed H.202 and handed the pen to Dr. Deb Richter, an advocate who has lobbied for a single-payer system for 20 years.

In her remarks, Richter said for the first time, health care in Vermont will be considered a public good rather than a commodity to be sold.

“We’re going to hear all kinds of scare stories – that this is a thoughtless experiment or that this is too bold,” Richter said. “I want to remind you that every other industrialized country does what we are trying to do. They do it for far less money, they live longer and they do it for far better care. So it’s time for Vermont to join the rest of the industrialized world.”

Richter thanked Shumlin who made a pledge “if he were elected governor he would make Vermont the first state in the nation to enact a publicly financed system that pays for health care for all Vermonters. How many politicians do you know who really do what they day they’re going to do?”

House Speaker Shap Smith, D-Morrisville, praised the House and Senate health care committee chairs before he launched into a speech excoriating critics of single payer.

“It’s amazing that we’re here and that we could be debating the fact that there could be something wrong (with) passing a law that creates coverage for all Vermonters,” Smith said. “It should be at the very core of what we believe in as citizens. It should be not debatable. It should be a fundamental principle for not only all Vermonters, but for all Americans. All of the other industrialized countries get it and thank God we here in Vermont get it, too.”

Smith chastised “those who say this may bring uncertainty.” He talked about rising health care expenditures and the cost of medical insurance premiums as more troubling uncertainties than the unknowns associated with creating a single-payer system.
“What is it like to face the uncertainty of not having health care coverage at all or having health care coverage that doesn’t really provide you with health care in the first place?” Smith said. “That’s uncertainty.”

Smith said the bill will remove uncertainties for Vermonters who are worried about having coverage and will create “commonsense payment reform” in which providers are paid for performance not for the number of patient visits.

Senate President Pro Tem John Campbell said he was proud to be part of a “courageous stand” on the second historic piece of ground breaking legislation enacted in the last two years, and he compared the passage of single-payer health care bill with the gay marriage law that was enacted in 2009.

Campbell warned, however, that “the next few years are going to be very difficult.”

“There are many people out there who would love to see us fail,” Campbell said. “We have to look at them and figure out why. There may be some insurance companies out there that are afraid they may lose some business. For that I’m sorry, but I have to look at people who are walking around without health care coverage who aren’t able to get in to see a doctor who are suffering from cancer and other maladies they may not be able to get treatment for just because we have a broken health care system. We can’t sit by folks we all have to get involved; we all have to be ready to fight the fight that surely will be coming over the next two or three years.”

Shortly after the ceremonial signing, MVP Health Care President and CEO David W. Oliker issued a statement blasting H.202.
Oliker said the Shumlin has not yet addressed the “legitimate and lingering concerns” of the bill’s critics. He emailed a list of questions to the press corps that he said had yet to be answered. Oliker takes issue with significant omissions in the legislation. The bill doesn’t spell out how the system would be paid for; it doesn’t address how Vermonters who work for out-of-state businesses would be affected; it doesn’t say whether physicians would leave Vermont if a unified reimbursement system is implemented; and it doesn’t include information about the economic impact of the plan.

“MVP Health Care is committed to continued participation in the dialog around these important questions,” Oliker wrote in a statement. “We are also committed, as we have been for more than 20 years, to our Vermont communities and members. MVP will continue to serve our customers and make investments to drive innovation that improves the quality of care in Vermont and enhances access to affordable health care.”

There is also pressure from the other side of the issue. Shortly before the signing, members of the Health Care is a Human Right Campaign” held a rally and outlined the steps the Shumlin administration still needs to take to satisfy their concerns.

“H.202 is the result of the work of a grassroots movement of Vermonters,” said David Kreindler, a leader in the movement, “but that work is far from done.” Kreindler said he was pleased that the bill mandated that the group’s five human rights principles – universality, equity, accountability, transparency, and participation – be incorporated into Vermont’s new health care system. The challenge, he said, would be in what the bill didn’t state.

“The struggles that we face in the coming years are mainly the issues that were not defined yet by H.202 but must be defined before we have a healthcare system,” said Kreindler.

At the conclusion of the address, Mary Gerisch, another leader in the movement, reminded the group of their ultimate goals. She said: ““The reason it’s so important is … the real cost, worth far more than dollars, is the lives of the human beings that are left ruined in bankruptcy and even death by the lack of a universal healthcare system. Those are the costs that we must curtail.”

If you read us, please support us.

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer.

We moderate every comment. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

Privacy policy
Anne Galloway

Recent Stories

  • It is a dis-service to all of us who support a single-payer health care system in Vermont, to headline H202 as “Nation’s First Single Payer Health Care Bill”. It is NOT single payer, though we aim for that.
    To misrepresent/overstate the benefits of H202 is to set the scene for its detractors, and downright opponents of single-payer. Even PNHP (Physicians for a National Health Program) have had to place criticism, much as they admire Vermont’s work, especially Dr. Richter’s unstinting advocacy.
    To label this “single payer” is to play Shumlin-style politics. He’d love to be known as the Gov who gave you Single Payer…but he’s not there yet. If you tout his unwarranted success at this point, you lessen the future chances for True Single Payer. The fact is that private insurers will still prowl the state looking for under & un insureds, as VT legislators & the 5 member “Board” do the hard work of nailing down the fundamental details.

  • Single payer does not presume that private insurance can’t still market supplemental policies. It rests with the single payer program to make these supplemental policies unnecessary in the large context of medical care. The Vermont law is a cause for celebration!

  • Pamela Allen

    I’ve been waiting for this, this is the hope I’ve been waiting….thank you being a great pioneer….I support you and the single payer system 100%, thank you sincerely, Pamela

  • Jenise DePinto

    Congratulations Vermont! Such a great achievement. I hope New York will emulate your example.

  • Luis barr

    We do not need insurance companies. They just add 30% to the cost of medical care, deny treatment to anyone they can, don’t know the meaning of preventive care, ignore proven alternative health treatments. They know people are catching on to the sham they are, and they know their business is going to disappear.

  • walter carpenter

    “They know people are catching on to the sham they are, and they know their business is going to disappear.”

    Thanks, Luis. We in the movement that brought this about know this well. We also know how hard they will fight to keep their profits off of our suffering

  • robert floch

    After working 16 years for the Public Health Service, Vermont’s leadership is refreshing.However work still needs to be done in the equitable distribution of wealth. Theplutocrats can wait everybody out and they know it.We have to keep hammering away on taxation of the plutocratic oligarchy or no real change for the proletariat will occur.

  • John Earl

    It is a step in the right direction—Our hope (my wife and I is that the Northeastern States along with The California, Oregon and Washington State join in a consortium to eventually provide universal Medicare and rid us of the huge payoffs that the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries pour into our congress.

  • John Brookhouser

    Lucky Vermont. I could wish that California was first. Let’s hope that many other states will do the same.

  • Cynthia Browning

    It is ironic to read the account of the speeches by leadership. The only part of this bill that may actually help the uninsured and the underinsured for sure will be through federal tax credits that subsidize the purchase of insurance through the Health Benefits Exchange, which is several years away and which we had to do no matter what. No uninsured or underinsured Vermonter should be looking to Green Mountain Care for assistance for more years beyond that — a degree of uncertainty about the availability of that program, shall we say?
    The House defeated an amendment that would have required an immediate intense effort to enroll the uninsured in the public programs for which half of them are already eligible and an immediate effort to explore the possibility of a state program to help underinsured Vermonters with high medical debt due to catastrophic illness or accident. Members of the House Health Care Committee said that they had deliberately chosen to focus on the long term big program and did not want to include in the bill immediate short run efforts that might help Vermonters in the meantime. (This was at a public meeting of the committee the morning of Wed 3/23, I think, when I presented the amendment, if anyone is interested. It would be interesting to know if the CD recording confirms my personal recollection.)
    Given the fact that all the politically and economically difficult work of defining the benefit package and determining the financing system is yet to be done, I would have been more cautious in my self-congratulations than those at the bill signing. These people ate their dessert first, and that is not healthy. I think that passing this legislation prematurely may have made it less likely that we will soon achieve our shared goal of affordable access to health care for all Vermonters. We should have developed an enduring political consensus on the difficult policy issues first if we want to have a sustainable program that cannot easily be undone by a future governor or legislature.

    Rep. Cynthia Browning