Coates & Ventriss: Seizing the opportunity

Editor’s note: This op-ed is by David Coates, who is a retired partner of KPMG, and Lisa Ventriss, who is president of the Vermont Business Roundtable.

Vermont has been faced with the underfunding of state worker and teacher pensions and retiree health care benefits for many years, and we have been reporting regularly to Vermonters on this critical financial issue. To date, nothing of significance has been done to curtail the upward trend of these obligations. We believe that we have a solution. But first, let’s briefly review the current situation.

As of June 30, 2012, the state’s liability for these obligations was $3.2 billion; up $500 million just since 2009. This is a path that will eventually lead to financial disaster for our state and future generations of Vermonters. For comparison purposes, the state currently owes $506 million in General Obligation bonds that it is paying from the General Fund; unlike the pension and retiree health benefits that is underfunded to the tune of over $80 million per year. In addition, the state has been taking over $20 million each year from the Teachers’ Pension Fund assets to pay for their retiree health care costs. This annual underfunding and raiding of the Teachers’ Pension Fund will not stop unless substantial changes are made now. Policymakers have been wrestling with this problem for years and have failed to find a solution.

We believe that dedicating this new revenue source (whatever the final number turns out to be) to these obligations, along with modest changes to the existing programs, will allow Vermont to craft a realistic plan to address our $3.2 billion obligation.

We believe we have found a solution that will allow for the orderly reduction of these obligations; a solution that requires money and policy reform.

Currently under consideration in Washington is a bill that would allow states to receive sales taxes on Internet sales. According to the Wall Street Journal, this could result in nearly $45 million in annual revenue to Vermont. We believe that dedicating this new revenue source (whatever the final number turns out to be) to these obligations, along with modest changes to the existing programs, will allow Vermont to craft a realistic plan to address our $3.2 billion obligation.

Using this new revenue source for any other purpose, given this existing promise to state workers and teachers, would represent a failure of leadership to make significant headway on this serious public policy problem.

Vermont finally has a chance to seize this once in a lifetime opportunity to settle this issue and put the state on a sustainable financial path to benefit not burden future generations.

Leave a Reply

3 Comments on "Coates & Ventriss: Seizing the opportunity"

Comment Policy

VTDigger.org requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
David Usher
2 years 11 months ago

If this Internet taxing opportunity comes about, David Coates and Lisa Ventriss have offered a creative opportunity for it’s use. The problem of unfunded liabilities won’t go away by itself and needs a massive infusion of revenue. This new tax may be it, although the competition for that new money will be fierce. At the same time, additional changes are needed, including a move to 401(k) defined contribution plans for new state employees and teachers to eventually replace the unaffordable defined benefit plans. The other sticky issue is whether teachers’ post-retirement health care will be rolled into Vermont’s single payer… Read more »

Arthur Hamlin
2 years 10 months ago

I have to give Mr. Coates’ credit. He just doesn’t want to give up trying to undermine the state and teacher benefits, especially their retirement plans. I don’t know what motivates him, but I think he should spend more time trying to get that chip off his shoulder than go after hard working public servants. As recently as just before the great recession, the state employees’ retirement plan was more than 100% funded. The great recession took it’s toll on the pension funds, it is true, but Mr. Coates says nothing of significant has been done and that is simply… Read more »

Rolf Mueller
2 years 10 months ago

Okay,
I’m willing to expose my ignorance.

$45 million in new revenue (Internet Sales Tax) will offset pension and retiree health benefits that is underfunded to the tune of over $80 million per year?

.

wpDiscuz
Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Coates & Ventriss: Seizing the opportunity"