Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

7 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. I had to chuckle…quoting Representative Oliver Olsen complaining about nasty campaigning is really funny.

  2. If these last-minute mailers really work, then Republicans should try using them next election cycle instead of whining about how their opponents played some dirty trick on them. It’s called campaigning and it’s the job of a campaign to define their opponent in a way that helps their candidate win the election.

  3. I am not from the Rutland-Windsor-1 district, but in the neighboring district, so I am not very familiar with the issues in that district. I don’t know anything more about vacation time and pay then what has been reported in the VTDigger.

    But I am somewhat familiar with the Rutland County Pro Business Coalition org which Mr. Eckhardt started before he ran for elected office. I had checked out their website several times in the past, and Mr. Eckhardt was a frequent guest on the Tim Philbin radio show.

    The RCPBC is known for sending out surveys to elected legislators and candidates to measure their “pro-biz” credentials. While such surveys can be helpful to voters, these survey questions seemed to be designed such to target, generally speaking, Democrats. There was no room for a candidate to write down a nuanced answer, just a simple Yes or No. One year, most Democrats decided not to fill out the surveys, and caught flack from RCPBC (free publicity in Rutland Herald for RCPBC).

    I can understand Mr. Eckhardt’s desire to be “independent”, but he did decide to align himself with one of the two major parties. Each major party has connections to national parties. As such, a decision to join a major party, unfortunately automatically enrolls one into the Two-Party Mudslinging Competition.

    Given that the RCPBC itself targeted certain politicians using narrowly worded survey questions (gotcha questions), it is a little bit ironic now that Mr. Eckhardt is on the other end of such politics.

    http://rcpbc.org/legislative-voting-records.php

    http://www.rcpbc.com/rutland-county-candidates-voting-records-2009.php

    http://www.rcpbc.com/rutland-county-candidates-voting-records-2008.php

  4. This is the pot calling the kettle black. In 1998, after the passage of Equal Educational Quality reform (Act 60) twelve prominent Democrats were targeted by the Republicans in the same vile and last minute manner which is described here. I was one of the Legislators targeted and defeated. I don’t know the truth of Eckhardt’s claims but I do know that Vermonters deserve to know the truth about their representatives. This includes roll calls, attendance and voting record. However, any tactic that is intended to sway voters with misinformation that can not be rebutted due to the nature of it coming at the last minute is ill intended and should be dismissed by any intelligent voter.

  5. Lest it be lost in all the fulminations, two things were claimed in the mailingand both were completely accurate:

    1) Rep. Eckhardt missed 35 votes out of 148 during the last two year session. (See Vt. Legislative web site for a record of all members’ voting records)

    2) As already verified by the State staff in the article, Rep. Eckhardt indeed accepted his regular legislative pay for two weeks during which he was not present in the Legislature. All Representatives are regularly directed to inform the payroll staff of any days during which they are absent and that they are not to be paid for such days.

    No attempted amount of dust in the air can avoid the fact that the assertions in the mailing were completely accurate, entirely relevant and had no possible factual defense.

  6. I reside in Mr. Eckhardt’s district and never saw such a postcard nor would it have mattered since I voted early. What I did note when I voted were the past special interest activities of the incumbent as described by Ron Pulcer. What influenced me most though was the pleasant and thoughtul demeanor of the victor, Anne Gallivan, when she campaigned at my door. Putting in a little effort campaigning seems to me to be a better strategy than complaining after you lose fair and square. In two elections I never saw Mr. Eckhardt or any of his campaign materials at my door so why should he lament not getting votes he did not work for or deserve. If a last minute postcard in the mail is what shaped people’s view of the incumbent then maybe the incumbent should take some responsibility for not better communicating with his constituents. Generally I find the political parties mass mailings a tremendous waste of paper.

    1. Maybe you weren’t home the day Mr. Eckhardt came to your house campaigning. Seems like a pretty big area that representative covers, so I suspect it would be quite a task to come to every voters home, and then back again and maybe again if they are not home. Truth told, you probably would have voted for his opponent even if he’d come to you place, chopped wood, changed the oil in your car and painted your house for you. Be honest here, it wasn’t Ms. Gallivan’s sparkling personality, it was the “D” after her name that got your vote. Hey, this reminds me. Did you ever see the picture taken on the House floor showing the sign Shap Smith uses to tell the Democrats whether to vote “Yes” or “No” on a bill? Saves all that pesky reading to actually understand what they’re voting on. Then when I talk with my legislators after and ask them why they voted for a particular bill they do not even know what I’m talking about. Ah well, that’s the price of one-party rule. You get what they want and you darned well better like it.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Rutland County lawmaker blames his loss on “garbage politics”"