Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

9 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Here’s the primary difference I see between these two candidates: Illuzi went looking for a statewide office to run for and settled on Auditor – Hoffer, on the other hand, wants to be an Auditor.

    That is the biggest reason I’m at this point planning on voting for Hoffer.

  2. It’s dismaying to see a “People” magazine type story on VT Digger given all of the substantive differences between Hoffer and Illuzzi. This is far from a style & personality campaign. Hoffer has been in the trenches analyzing economic, demographic and financial data for decades and identifying weaknesses in state policy based on cumulative trends and impacts. The reporter accurately describes Illuzzi as the glad-hander politician who often votes with the direction of the wind in the NEK to please his constituents despite his values and beliefts. This type of reporting furthers “politics as fame seekers” and does nothing to further civic engagement so badly needed in a fledging democracy.

  3. I agree with Rama Schneider completely: we need a state auditor who actually wants to be state auditor, not one that settled on that office after prolonged consideration of alternatives.

    Also, what did Senator Illuzzi mean on the WCAX program “You Can Quote Me” when he said that he would continue to do the state’s attorney job at the same time as taking office as auditor for some period? Will he then be working part time as auditor but collecting full time pay during that time?

    Is this another sign of a certain ambivalence on his part about the job?

    Rep. Cynthia Browning, Arlington

  4. Note to Doug Hoffer:

    You can’t be the State Auditor unless you get elected.

    Getting elected requires you to run a vigorous, energetic campaign.

    Campaign events matter
    Hoopla matters
    Visuals matter (smile for photos!)
    Tone matters
    Shake hands, hold babies, pan for cameras. Make a splash. It all matters.

    New media is great … but still doesn’t have the reach required to win a campaign in a rural state.

    I’m on your side all the way, but if you’re going to win any political office, you have to mount a better campaign.

  5. I have had personal experience with Doug Hoffer. I do not trust him. I find him mean-spirited, cynical, and motivated by his political leanings, not by a moral code. I will not vote for him. Vince, on the other hand, is a wildman. He is not my first choice for auditor but–to be frank–I think Vince will make things extremely interesting. I am thankful that the Democrats control State government and I hope that control continues. It is good, though, for our democracy to have someone from the other party in a watchdog position. So I will vote for Vince and brace myself for Toad’s Wild Ride if he wins.

  6. I have a great deal of personal and professional experience with Doug Hoffer, which has engendered a great deal of respect for his intelligence and analytic abilities. He practices a dogged attitude towards uncovering and presenting the facts and has the ability to interpret his findings in real-world terms.

    Vermont deserves someone like Doug, and I hope, now that we have the character profile behind us, Digger and other news outlets will get in there and write and broadcast about the stuff that matters.

  7. While Vince is known by everyone it seems, including myself, when it comes to auditing our State Government practices, there is no better person than Doug Hoffer. He has played this role as an outsider. Wouldn’t it be great to have him working FOR US? He put in a good showing on WCAX this morning. He has my vote!
    Mary Alice Bisbee

  8. We at Vermont Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals have worked with Doug Hoffer for the past few years, and know him to be very bright, and dogged (ditto to John Fairbanks above) about knowing, understanding, and communicating about – to the detail – complex systems. He has regularly provided Vermonters with astute economic and policy analyses of health care reform and other issues important to the state. He will work very hard in this position, and will be very capable.

  9. Doug Hoffer would be a fantastic auditor for the state. I have met him. He is a genius at making all these inscrutable numbers beyond the grasp of understanding for the rest of us understandable so that even a numbers ignoramus like me can make sense of them — something that is no easy feat.

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State auditor’s race: Policy wonk vs. politician"