Social Links

Run of Site Leaderboard

Articles in this series

6 responsesSubscribe to comments

  1. Excellent article with some grat quotes, thanks!

  2. Research has shown that there are alternatives to aerial spraying, which is an antiquated and indiscriminate method of dealing with the 1 type of mosquito that carries EEE. We know that these vector borne diseases will only be increasing in coming years and the State should be planning now for appropriate, safe and sustainable methods to counter the health problems to avoid future emergency spraying., not using antiquated, indiscriminate and unsafe aerial spraying.

    Vermont’s bees are some of the healthiest in the country and the state should be doing all it can to see they remain so. Read Fruitless Fall by Vermont author Rowan Jacobsen to learn more about the plight of the bees.

    Bats, birds and beneficial insects will also be harmed by this aerial application. Here is the full quote from the EPA doc re: bees:
    (3) Non-Target Terrestrial Insects
    Phenothrin has been demonstrated to be highly toxic on an acute contact basis to non-target terrestrial insects, particularly to honeybees. Honeybees may also face indirect dietary risks from phenothrin toxicity. In addition to phenothrin’s high toxicity, the potential for non-target insect exposure to phenothrin is high because phenothrin is most often applied between April to October to control mosquitoes; non-target insects are also at their most active during this time of year. Because of the large exposure potential and high toxicity determination, phenothrin may pose significant acute risks to non-target insects.

  3. I’m so sorry that 1 person died and another has been infected with EEE–but spraying 18,000+ acres with a chemical? that is known to kill fish & bees? but “safe”for humans? (Can anyone point me to some well designed, scientific “large population longitudinal research studies” related to people, conducted by folks other than those affiliated with producing or funding this pesticide?)

    Here’s a bit of info I’ve found so far on Anvil 10+10 (Sumithrin), the pesticide being sprayed here in Vermont, via a “crop duster” type of plane from Texas. Purportedly, chemical(s) in this pesticide is/are now linked to possible effects in human endocrine system and might be a hormone interrupter thereby affecting mammary tissue. More/better research is needed. What will it take to end all cancers and all other insidious diseases?

    http://www.bcaction.org/resources/breast-cancer-action-toolkits/ “What you should know about breast cancer and the environment”

    When Massachusetts and New York used this same pesticide, they put out the following information:

    MA: http://www.cmmcp.org/anvil.htm

    NY: http://www.health.ny.gov/publications/2738/

    Please read the following two links–which discuss “chrysanthemums”–and more: http://www.nospray.org/flyers.shtml
    http://www.flcv.com/AnvilTox.html

    I certainly don’t know what the right answer is. I do understand that our state officials are trying to act in our best interests while trying to do the most good, for the most people with the least amount of harm to all (including our food supply chain and all else affiliated with our planet). EEE is certainly scary and a horrible disease–but spraying with pesticides containing chemicals that may not necessarily be “safe” is also scary. One would hope that we might have learned from the past (eg., the spraying of DEET and the “after-the-fact” test results by “outside agencies” who had not produced that pesticide).

    Shouldn’t the federal government’s rules and regs be requiring long-duration, longitudinal, well designed, scientific research studies conducted and validated by folks not affiliated with or funded by any of the companies involved with the production of these chemicals and pesticides–just as happens with other well designed research and clinical trials for various cancers, Parkinsons, Alzheimers, MS and all the other “chronic”, horrible insidious diseases’ treatment drugs?

    These are not easy questions. There are no easy answers or solutions to these problems–but prudent, good science and sharing of all known facts seems to be a “no brainer”.

    My heart goes out to the family and all who knew and loved Mr. Breen, the other hospitalized person–and the folks who asked for a “no fly zone” over their organic gardens/farms.

  4. How ever, in this case 19 Emus died at one farm from the misquitos. The farm was sprayed and the following year another emu caught the disease and it’s caretaker died, either from being bitten by the misquitos in the area, or from the emu feces. However in that same area another man contacted the disease, through and insect bite, and a third man contacted West Nile Virus. How does the Dept of Health know that the virus has not passed to the human biting missquitos. In Tennessee the CDC tested all of the misquitos in the area by sampling and determined by DNA what they were eating and what they were carrying. Meaning they studied the human biting missquitos, the mamal that has no vacine approved to keep them from dying from the bites. To keep insisting that the misquitos don’t bite human mamals seems antiquated. They did, or they do or the disease has changed. That premis unproven is a huge health risk, and panic spraying a pristine sole aquifer area of an entire town is not solution that appears to me to be viable. In addition you are killing the frogs, bats, salmanders, darning needles, and other insects that eat the swamp mosquitos. In addition we may have the Silent Spring.

  5. Lest we succumb to the dumb notion that we are suffering from overpopulation and we have to rid ourselves of the “useless eaters”, aerial spraying is just another conspiracy to ruin croplands and the environment. The proof of this is quite evident. For those of you who like to stick your head where the sun doesn’t shine, question why the local hospitals’ parking lots are so full, why we have a huge drug problem in the US, and why politicians are ruining the US economy.

  6. This is utter madness. We are being poisoned by our own Dept of Health. When does self-defense come into play here?

Leave a Reply

Comment policy

VTD requires that all commenters identify themselves by first and last name. You may wonder why we don't accept anonymous comments. The short answer is: We want to keep the discourse civil.

You might rightly ask, since most online newspapers accept anonymous posts from readers, what makes VTD so special?

The long answer is: Anonymous comments don't support our mission. We are a nonprofit news organization dedicated to enhancing democracy through in-depth journalism. Our role is to foster a civil online discourse, and one very simple and effective way to do that is to require commenters to identify themselves. This isn't a new idea, of course. This is the way newspapers have treated letters to the editor since time immemorial.

As a result of our comment policy, VTD has created a safe zone for readers who want to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation.

Privacy policy

VTDigger.org does not share specific information about our readers with other entities. Email addresses we collect through our subscription list and comment submissions are kept private.

We use Google analytics to generate aggregated data regarding the size and geographic distribution of our readership. This information helps us gauge how many readers come to the website and what towns they live in. It does not include addresses or other identifying characteristics about our readers.

Donate Today

We're an independent nonprofit organization, your donation helps fund the digging, and, it's tax deductible.

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "State sees first death from EEE; mosquito-targeted spraying under way"