Two people in a meeting. A man gestures in the foreground, facing a woman who listens attentively. A clock and bulletin board are visible on the wall.
Sen. Ruth Hardy, D-Addison, listens as Alex Farrell, commissioner of the Department of Housing and Community Development, speaks before the Senate Natural Resources Committee at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Wednesday, Feb. 26. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Last year, lawmakers set in motion sweeping reforms to Act 250, Vermontโ€™s half-century-old land use law. The reform bill, Act 181, slices Vermont into a series of โ€œtiersโ€ that dictate how development will be treated under the law, with more leniency for housing in some areas (Tiers 1A and 1B) and stricter environmental review in others (Tiers 2 and 3).

Straightforward, right? Why they didnโ€™t just go with Tiers 1-4 will forever be the bane of this reporterโ€™s existence. Some new members of the Senate Committee on Natural Resource and Energy were also trying to grasp the outline of these tiers on Wednesday.

Are they the same tiers used in a 2023 conservation bill, asked Sen. Terry Williams, R-Rutland. Answer: no. Do we have a map of the new Act 250 tiers, asked Sen. Ruth Hardy, D-Addison. Also no โ€” one doesnโ€™t exist yet, because lots of regional map-drawing and rulemaking needs to play out before the areas are set in stone.

In lieu of that visual aid, Hardy said she wanted to see โ€œa political cartoonโ€ of someone trying to wrap their mind around these tiers-on-tiers. Said person should be crying, said Sen. Anne Watson, D/P-Washington, motioning tears falling down her face.

โ€œMaybe some of our media partners can make that cartoon happen,โ€ suggested Alex Farrell, commissioner of the Department of Housing and Community Development โ€” pointing to yours truly. 

I have yet to accept the commission. Farrell joined the committee to ask its members to consider more reforms to Act 250 this year, which are part of Gov. Phil Scottโ€™s housing proposal. The administration wants to see interim exemptions for housing (put in place before the tier system goes into effect in a few years) extended for longer, and expanded to more places. 

Team Scott also wants to get rid of a โ€œroad ruleโ€ thatโ€™s meant to kick in when someone wants to build a private road beyond a certain length, a measure intended to deter forest fragmentation. And the administration hopes to take a โ€œstep backโ€ on Tier 3, Farrell said, making the tier meant to further protect โ€œcritical natural resource areasโ€ into a study.

There did not appear to be much appetite in the room for these changes.

โ€œThe way that we ended up with Act 181 was because it was a grand bargainโ€ between housing advocates and environmental advocates, Watson said.

But the administration doesnโ€™t feel that 2024 legislation struck the right balance between those interests. โ€œThese provisions to strengthen [Act 250] โ€” from the administrationโ€™s perspective โ€” arenโ€™t entirely necessary,โ€ Farrell said.

โ€” Carly Berlin


In the know

Military retirees and lawmakers gathered Wednesday to call on the Legislature to exempt military pensions from taxation.

Gov. Scott has long proposed the idea, and this year, dual bills in the House and Senate have garnered dozens of sponsors from all political persuasions.

โ€œLet’s make Vermont a place where military families don’t just serve, but where they can afford to stay, thrive and contribute for generations to come,โ€ Colonel Laura Caputo, an active Air National Guard member, told a crowded Cedar Creek Room. โ€œThe economic impact of keeping these Vermonters here is clear. If they stay, they buy homes, they start businesses, they contribute to the economy for decades.โ€

The state estimates the tax exemption for retirees and their survivors would cost about $4 million annually. Critics worry the tax break could help people who don’t financially need it. The proposalโ€™s proponents argue it would keep more former servicemen and women in Vermont, helping meet the stateโ€™s dire workforce needs, especially considering a majority of other states already offer an exemption. 

โ€”Ethan Weinstein

As Vermont prepares for March Town Meeting voting, many once- or twice-flooded communities are dealing with lingering pools of red ink โ€” and a cloud of questions about whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency will uphold past promises to cover 75% to 90% of cleanup costs amid President Donald Trumpโ€™s call for cuts.

To date, FEMA has awarded Vermont more than $100 million for 2023 flooding and $10 million for 2024 damage, its website reports. The agency wonโ€™t provide specifics about individual municipalities โ€œfor privacy reasonsโ€ and adds only that reimbursement timelines โ€œwill vary by weeks or monthsโ€ depending on the complexity of an application, according to a statement.

But town clerks and treasurers had a lot to say. Read about it here

โ€” Kevin Oโ€™Connor


Bathroom backup 

A plugged pipe in the Mezzanine bathrooms caused plumbing problems Wednesday. In the morning, a notable stench emanated from outside the House Government Operations Committee. The clog impacted the cafeteriaโ€™s bathrooms as well due to connected piping, and the menโ€™s bathroom remained closed in the afternoon.  

Department of Buildings and General Services staff were hard at work fixing the problem throughout the day.

โ€” Ethan Weinstein