Remote workers Erik Yunghans and Louisa Wilson are pictured with their children at their home in Moretown on Aug. 5, 2020. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Vermont will likely continue to offer reimbursement to those who move to the state for a job.


Lawmakers voted this week to approve $630,000 to continue a program created to attract workers to the state โ€” though the measure also calls for a study of the program to determine whether it actually works.

โ€œThere have been questions about whether itโ€™s valuable, but I certainly believe itโ€™s of value,โ€ said Sen. Ginny Lyons, D-Chittenden, a bill sponsor. โ€œThis is the icing on the cake for people who are thinking about moving.โ€

The bill, S.62, which awaits the governorโ€™s signature, would offer a grant of up to $5,000 to those who relocate to the state for a job. New residents who come to areas with higher unemployment rates or lower wages could receive up to $7,500 in grants. If signed into law, it would be available on a first come, first served basis starting July 1. 

Itโ€™s the latest iteration of an incentive program that has received widespread recognition and been criticized as an ineffective and wasteful marketing ploy.

The state garnered national attention after Gov. Phil Scott announced in 2018 that Vermont would offer $10,000 to anyone who wanted to move to the state and work remotely. After businesses said they needed help finding workers, the program was expanded to anyone who moves to the state for a job. 

In 2019, the first year of the program, the state gave out $500,000 to 140 workers, according to a 2020 report from the Agency of Commerce and Community Development. The average grant was $3,571.

Later that year, state Auditor Doug Hoffer questioned the value of the program, saying that it benefited only people who were already moving to the state. 

Applicants had to prove residency before applying, meaning they โ€œhad the will and the means to relocate without the program,โ€ he wrote in a report. 

More recently, in 2020,  the number of remote workers and out-of-staters buying homes surged by 38%, though that may be due more to the pandemic and less to the stateโ€™s branding efforts. โ€œIncentives to remote workers is a critical economic development tool, especially as we come out of Covid,โ€ said Sen. Michael Sirotkin, D-Chittenden, who sponsored the bill. 

The state should build off that momentum, he said. โ€œWe have the opportunity to continue to lead the country in attracting new workers who wish to keep their jobs and work remotely from their new Vermont home.โ€

The Senate Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs originally tried to make the measure permanent and suggested $1 million annually for the program. House members were less enthusiastic, noting that it was not evidence-based or effective.

Ultimately the committee approved a reduced, $630,000 package. Lawmakers also charged the Agency of Commerce and Community Development with adopting measurable goals and an audit strategy to determine the effectiveness of the program. 

The agency is expected to report back to lawmakers by December.

Regardless of the number of people the program attracts, it draws attention to the state and can help its long-term economic development strategy, said Austin Davis, a lobbyist for the Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce. โ€œThereโ€™s something to be said about putting out a sign saying youโ€™re open for business,โ€ he said. 

The measure can help attract more diverse Vermonters, he said. Anyone who does move will likely bring a spouse or family with them. 

Besides, he said, it builds the stateโ€™s modern brand. โ€œThis helps us put ourselves out there in a way other than just cows and Bernie Sanders,โ€ Davis said. โ€œThat kind of thing is needed.โ€

Katie Jickling covers health care for VTDigger. She previously reported on Burlington city politics for Seven Days. She has freelanced and interned for half a dozen news organizations, including Vermont...