Health Care

Vermont Conversation: Stanford epidemiologist Steven Goodman on the Year of the Pandemic

The Vermont Department of Health trains EMTs on administering Covid-19 tests in Newport in May 2020. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The Vermont Conversation with David Goodman is a VTDigger podcast that features in-depth interviews on local and national issues with politicians, activists, artists, changemakers and citizens who are making a difference. Listen below, and subscribe on Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcasts or Spotify to hear more.

Back in March when the Covid-19 outbreak was in its early days, I asked my brother Steve to join me on the Vermont Conversation to talk about what we could expect with this new virus. Steve Goodman, M.D., MHS, Ph.D., is an associate dean at Stanford Medical School, where he is also a professor of epidemiology and population health and of medicine.

When we first spoke, Steve described the coronavirus as a tsunami about to overwhelm us. His words were prescient: nine months later, over 340,000 Americans have died from Covid-19 and at least 20 million people have been infected. Vermont, once an outlier with few Covid deaths and infections, now has daily averages of over 80 new cases and two deaths.

Steve returns to the podcast this week to share his thoughts on this Year of the Pandemic: where we are, how we got here, and how it ends. This partial transcript has been edited for length and clarity.

David Goodman: President-elect Biden said this week that the toughest days of the pandemic are ahead of us. That’s an extraordinary prediction from our nation’s incoming leader. What do you see as you look ahead? 

Steve Goodman: The Covid-19 rates across the country right now are reaching peaks not seen before. The rates are starting to come down in a number of states, but they are coming down from very, very high levels. And the post-Christmas surge may be frighteningly large. It is clear that many families gathered indoors without masks and then went back to their communities, which is a potent way to spread the virus nationwide. There could be another Covid bomb that detonates just before Biden comes in.

Steve Goodman, a professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University. Stanford photo

We already have over 300,000 dead, with daily death tolls of over 3,000 people. How bad can it get?

We’re at a very high level, but I think it is going to turn around in the next few months. We’re just beginning to see the first signs of that, even if the Christmas surge temporarily reverses it. Biden’s team takes science seriously, will message consistently and forcefully about what should be done, and with more immunizations, we will have a countervailing force. 

A large percentage of deaths come from the elderly. Sixty percent of the deaths are in people 75 and older, 80% are in those 65 and older — and they only make up about 17% of the population, with a much smaller percent living in long-term care facilities. So if we just immunize the folks over 75 and those who live in long-term care facilities, we immediately reduce the number of deaths by 60-70%, taking pressure off of the medical care system. 

If we were to vaccinate everyone over 50 years of age, is that enough for us to then resume some semblance of normal life? 

If death is the only metric and we could have everybody over 50 immunized tomorrow, then yes, we would probably be able to get back to normal life. But it’s a long way between now and then. And age and death are not the only factors here. It’s easily going to be six to nine months before we can get anywhere close to vaccinating the percentage of the population that would get us back to “life as normal.” Between now and then, we’re going to have to continue to maintain virtually everything we’re doing now, including masking and distancing. 

This epidemic is hundreds of micro-epidemics. It’s hyper-local. Vaccine uptake is going to vary, as is the degree of distancing and masking. So while we might be able to control the virus pretty well across the country, we’re still going to see hotspots. We also know that there’s a lot of hesitancy about the vaccines right now, especially in minority and high-risk communities. That may fade as millions get vaccinated, or it may increase if we start to see side effects that we’re not anticipating. It’s about continued messaging, surveillance, and trust within the communities that these vaccines — about which we don’t have full information — are on balance good for them. 

The other critical thing that we don’t know is how long the vaccine protection lasts. We have good reason to believe it will last at least nine months to a year, but we don’t know that yet. There’s a lot to learn. 

You testified before the FDA in December about both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. What’s new and special about these mRNA vaccines? 

The “M” is for messenger, and RNA is the nucleic acid which is the key intermediary between DNA, our genetic code, and the formation of proteins, which make up the substance of our bodies. There’s never been an mRNA vaccine approved for general use. mRNA vaccines are extremely clever. They provide a blueprint — the mRNA — that gets into the cell and tricks it into creating the same spike protein that appears on the surface of the coronavirus, but there’s no virus. Then the body reacts and creates antibodies to that protein, so if the virus ever invades, the body is poised to attack infected cells which show the spike protein.

These vaccines look to be extraordinarily safe. About 2 million Americans have now been vaccinated, and we’re only seeing a few reactions. The threat from Covid-19 is much, much greater than any possible threat of the vaccine itself, so the risk-benefit ratio right now looks to be pretty spectacular.

How did the richest country in the world become home to the worst outbreak of Covid-19 in the world? Is this a failure of traditional public health measures or is it something else?

This is a story that will be told and retold as a cautionary lesson. What’s obvious is that we did not have leadership from the top. We did not have a consistent public health message or a dependence on the science. And we did not have anything remotely like a national strategy to combat anything. We saw it right from the beginning in the president’s downplaying of the virus’s seriousness, which he told Bob Woodward he knew to be false at the time. That was particularly shocking. In order to get people to do what they probably would not like to do — which is to wear masks and stay away from other people — you need planning, and a consistent, rational justification from the top. We had none of that.

Instead, there was a tremendous amount of strife, controversy, and counter-messaging. Advisers told the president what he wanted to hear, advancing a bizarre idea that the more “low risk” people that got sick, the more we would be protected. It’s not a plan that could ever have worked. The failure at the top made it very difficult for others to build their own effective responses, even though most governors desperately tried. There was also a neutering and silencing of our main public health agency, the Centers for Disease Control. 

I don’t think there was a failure of public health per se, but there has been a failure of investment in public health over decades. Prevention efforts have been repeatedly cut, including those around epidemic prevention. So our public health infrastructure was not up to the task. Even with ideal leadership from the top, we didn’t have the people, the things, the communication infrastructure — we had almost none of the pieces in sufficient volume to respond to this. I don’t want to call it a public health failure because everybody in public health was trying so hard; none of them failed. But when no resources are devoted to the infrastructure, it is completely predictable that the response to one of the great challenges of our generation would be inadequate.

Trump’s main Covid adviser in the last half year, Dr. Scott Atlas, is a radiologist from Stanford and a frequent guest on Fox News. He recently resigned from the Trump administration under a torrent of criticism, including from you and your Stanford colleagues, who essentially said he was a charlatan. What do you think is the impact of a guy like Scott Atlas, who was one of the big proponents of herd immunity — the idea that the more people that get sick, the better?

Atlas was brought on to the Coronavirus Task Force with literally no expertise in this area. And the reason he was brought on was because he said what the administration already wanted to say. His audition was on Fox News, and he spoke with seeming authority. But he was saying things that were completely counter to the science, telling people to get together unmasked for the holidays and saying things that were objectively false. He was part of an administration crowd spreading an alternative message to the subset of people who wanted to ignore public health advice. Super spreading events require relatively few people to ignite a forest fire. We are now seeing the results.

What is it going to take in a Biden administration to reassert the role of public health? Places such as South and North Dakota now have higher infection rates than many developing countries. Will some areas of the country just give up on public health and wait for the vaccine?

There are going to be pockets of resistance and potentially high infection rates in some places. But I think that public health and having an organized national response with a chorus of consistent, empathic, informed voices will indeed change the direction of the conversation. Long term, the most sobering thing is that this is not necessarily the last pandemic we’re going to see in our lifetimes. In fact, there are many reasons to believe that there might be another one coming within the next decade or two, and we have to be ready. Leadership by informed people can happen moderately quickly and a rebuilding of credibility will follow. It will not be so fast to build the national infrastructure that we need, not only for this challenge, but for the next one. And that has to start on day one.

We are now in the closing days of the Year of the Pandemic. When we talked in March, where did you think we would be by the end of the year?

I’m surprised that we’re in a third wave. I thought we would learn our lesson. I thought that Ohio would learn from New York, and Indiana would learn from Ohio, and the Dakotas would learn from Indiana. I didn’t think that every area of this country would be in denial until they were overwhelmed. I thought back then that there would be more federal response once they actually realized the seriousness of this. So I am surprised that there hasn’t been a nationally coordinated response by now. 

I also never saw coming the politicization of basic public health measures, that it would be seen as a weird badge of honor, or toughness, or machismo not to wear a mask and to engage in mass spreading behavior. It’s all contributed to this disaster. I did see the potential for disaster if nothing much was done. I didn’t anticipate so little being done, and particularly that there would be so many people working to make it worse.

How does this end?

I think we’re at the beginning of that ending, but it’s going to be a long last chapter. It’s going to end in this country with a more coherent, integrated, coordinated public health response combined with more effective, and hopefully fair and just distribution of vaccines, as fast as we can get them out. I can’t quite see life getting back to normal on a national basis until sometime between June and September. 

Even if it “ends” here,  what will happen around the world, in India, in Africa, parts of Asia? That’s where we’re going to have to be looking and helping a huge amount.

Sign up for our guide to the global coronavirus outbreak and its impact on Vermont, with latest developments delivered to your inbox.


David Goodman

About David

David Goodman is an award-winning journalist and the author of a dozen books, including four New York Times bestsellers that he co-authored with his sister, Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman. His work has appeared in Mother Jones, New York Times, Outside, Boston Globe and other publications. He is the host of The Vermont Conversation, a VTDigger podcast featuring in-depth interviews about local and national topics. The Vermont Conversation is also an hour-long weekly radio program that can be heard on Wednesday at 1 p.m. on WDEV/Radio Vermont.

Email: [email protected]

Send us your thoughts

VTDigger is now accepting letters to the editor. For information about our guidelines, and access to the letter form, please click here.


Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Vermont Conversation: Stanford epidemiologist Steven Goodman on the Y..."