Typically, the names of young drivers involved in car accidents have been disclosed by police. Now, Vermont State Police have asked for a legal review, because some cases may go to family court, where proceedings are secret. File photo by Andrew Martin/News & Citizen

For decades, the names of juveniles involved in car accidents, fires and other public incidents have been part of the public record.

No more for the Vermont State Police. For the time being, it is no longer disclosing the names of juveniles involved in incidents its troopers deal with.

Michael Schirling, commissioner of the Vermont Department of Public Safety, ordered the change earlier this month while the agency does a legal review of how to handle the disclosure of the names of juveniles.

Asked Friday about the move, Schirling replied in an email, โ€œIโ€™m not prepared to talk about it, as Iโ€™ve not received the requisite legal assessment/briefing.โ€

Schirling, speaking during Gov. Phil Scottโ€™s semi-weekly press conference on Friday, did say the legal review has not been completed.

The change came after questions arose following a double-fatal crash involving a teenage driver in Chittenden County. Traffic investigators say Isabel Jennifer Seward, 16, of Atlanta, Georgia, drove across the Route 7 centerline in Charlotte, crashing into a vehicle headed the other way and killing the Ferrisburgh couple inside it. 

Because of the driverโ€™s age, any legal action would occur in family court, where proceedings are secret.

โ€œWe take that seriously and we donโ€™t want to impact this case or other cases while we figure this out,โ€ Scott said at Fridayโ€™s press conference โ€œIf they hadn’t brought it up, we would still be doing the same thing weโ€™ve been doing.โ€ 

โ€œTemporary is the key word,โ€ Scott said of the change. โ€œWe want to work through and make sure that weโ€™re not implicating or altering a case โ€” a future case โ€” in regards to naming an underage driver. Once we get through that, we hopefully will get back to where we were before or have something that we can satisfy both needs.โ€ 

Chittenden County Stateโ€™s Attorney Sarah George said her office did not ask that the teenage driverโ€™s name not be released, though she agrees it should not have been.  

The Vermont State Police referred news reporters to Georgeโ€™s office for the teenagerโ€™s name, โ€œand we refused to provide it,โ€ George wrote in an email Friday. โ€œIt appears they then went back to VSP and VSP decided to release it.?”

George said her reading of state law tells her that information about a juvenile should not be released โ€œunless any case related to the conduct is filed in [adult] criminal court.โ€

Col. Matthew Birmingham, director of the Vermont State Police, informed staff about the change in an email Sept. 11.

โ€œAt the direction of the commissioner, please put a temporary hold on releasing any personal identifying information on juveniles,โ€ Birmingham wrote. โ€œThe only exception to this temporary hold is if a juvenile has been charged with a crime as an adult. Earlier today, the commissionerโ€™s office became aware of potential conflicting statutory and policy guidance related to the release of juvenile information.โ€

Birmingham said the agency asked for a โ€œswift and full reviewโ€ by the Vermont Attorney Generalโ€™s Office. 

โ€œUntil that is complete, this temporary hold is in effect,โ€ the colonel wrote..

The change was first reported by journalist Michael Donoghue in articles that have run in several newspapers across the state. Donoghue is also executive director of the Vermont Press Association.

An editorial also appeared this week in the Caledonian Record titled โ€œPublic at any age,โ€ and it was also published in other Vermont newspapers. It calls for Vermont State Police to again publicly release the names of juveniles involved in incidents they handle.  

โ€œThe information is public under the Vermont Constitution, the Vermont Public Records Law, the rules of the Vermont DMV and the current Vermont State Police public information policy,โ€ the editorial stated. โ€œItโ€™s pretty clear to us, that makes it public information.โ€

Lisa Loomis, Vermont Press Association president and editor and co-owner of the Valley Reporter, echoed those comments.ย 

โ€œWe are concerned about it,โ€ Loomis said of the state police position. โ€œHistorically, this information has been released.โ€ 

Loomis said the public is entitled to the information.

Vermont Attorney General TJ Donovan said the matter has become complicated with recent changes in juvenile and youthful offender laws. Those changes affect when certain cases start in adult criminal courts, which are open to the public, or in family court, where proceedings are confidential.    .

โ€œI think accident reports are public records, unless and until a confidential proceeding is commenced,โ€ Donovan said this week.

However, determining when a confidential proceeding has commenced is not always easy to determine. โ€œThat is the source of contention and confusion here that weโ€™ve got to figure out,โ€ the attorney general said. 

What if a reporter asked police for the name of a 16-year-old driver involved in a crash? โ€œIf at the time you asked, there is no citation or no summons for family court, it is a public record unless you know that itโ€™s going to end up in family court,โ€ he said.

How soon after an incident do police know if a case will be considered in family court or adult criminal court, or in no court at all?  

โ€œItโ€™s going to be a case-by-case analysis,โ€ Donovan replied. โ€œThatโ€™s what weโ€™re all trying to grapple with.โ€ 

VTDigger's criminal justice reporter.