Vermont Gas
The Vermont Gas Systems headquarters in South Burlington. File photo by Bob LoCicero/VTDigger

[T]he state Public Utility Commission has affirmed a decision ordering Vermont Gas Systems to pay a $23.7 million penalty for โ€œimprudentโ€ spending on its Addison Natural Gas Pipeline project, leaving current customers to pay the remaining $134 million it took to complete the pipeline.

Greg Marchildon, state director of AARP Vermont, which had appealed an earlier rate ruling to the state Supreme Court, called Mondayโ€™s decision one of the worst ever in its effect on ratepayers in the state.

Marchildon said the commissionโ€™s action is just the most recent example of how the regulatory system is broken and designed to benefit energy companies at the expense of the ratepayer.

โ€œItโ€™s clear that the Green Mountain Powers and the Vermont Gases of the world are going to get what they want, and itโ€™s clear that the Legislature has to step up,โ€ he said. โ€œUntil then ratepayers are going to be raked over the coals.โ€

Last year the Public Utility Commission issued its original order that Vermont Gas Systems โ€” a public utility that along with Green Mountain Power is owned by Montreal-based Gaz Mรฉtro (since renamed Energir) โ€” would only have to cover $31.6 million of the $165 million pipeline projectโ€™s cost.

AARP, the retiree advocacy group, then appealed the ruling in Superior Court, arguing the commission had been too lenient in its response to alleged mismanagement that saw the price of the pipeline rise from the original estimated cost of $87 million to $165 million.

A sign alerts driversย  to Vermont Gas pipeline construction work in Williston in 2016. File photo by Morgan True/VTDigger

The group contended that existing customers of Vermont Gas should not have to pay more than $130 million for what it termed a mismanaged pipeline that would not affect current customersโ€™ utility needs.

AARP lost in the lower court but then appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court, which in April told the Public Utility Commission to provide a better justification for setting the penalty cap for Vermont Gas at no more than $31.6 million.

Much of the Public Utility Commissionโ€™s Monday ruling explored the debate among the Department of Public Service, the Public Utility Commission, Vermont Gas Systems and AARP over how to accurately assess the monetary value of โ€œimprudent decisions.โ€

The Department of Public Service showed evidence that $23.7 million was directly tied to specific management failings on the project, but it also added $10 million in “global disallowanceโ€ penalties for the companyโ€™s โ€œearly missteps in planning and budgeting.โ€

Combining those two sums, the Department of Public Service recommended a $33.7 million penalty for Vermont Gas Systems.

AARP submitted briefs to the Public Utility Commission asserting that no costs above the initial estimated $86.7 million project cost should be covered by ratepayers.

Under AARPโ€™s model, Vermont Gas Systems would pay $78.3 million and the remaining $86.7 million would be added to the utilityโ€™s rates.

The Public Utility Commission noted in its decision that โ€” unlike the Department of Public Service โ€” AARP did not present evidence โ€œsupporting specific cost disallowances for imprudence.โ€

The Public Utility Commission decided that there was no evidence to support the Department of Public Serviceโ€™s $10 million global disallowance and therefore decided that the only penalty that there was evidence for was the $23.7 million.

Beth Parent
Beth Parent, spokesperson for Vermont Gas Systems. File photo by Erin Mansfield/VTDigger

Vermont Gas Systemsโ€™ spokesperson Beth Parent said in a statement that the company appreciates the โ€œthorough review from the Supreme Court and the Public Utility Commissionโ€ and that it remains โ€œfocused on the future and continuing to provide the best service for our more than 51,000 customers.โ€

The Public Utility Commission also ordered that Vermont Gasโ€™ return on equity, the driver of a utilityโ€™s profitability, would serve as an additional financial penalty for the companyโ€™s โ€œmanagement failings.โ€ In February, the commission came to an agreement with Vermont Gas to cap the rate of return at 8.5 percent from 2017-2019.

Mondayโ€™s ruling is not expected to result in an immediate hike in rates, as Vermont Gas asked state regulators to approve a rate reduction that would see residential customers pay 2.7 percent less for natural gas starting in the next fiscal year.

An earlier version of this story misstated the amount to be paid by ratepayers. It is $134 million when factoring in $7 million Vermont Gasย had earlier agreed to write off.

Kit Norton is the general assignment reporter at VTDigger. He is originally from eastern Vermont and graduated from Emerson College in 2017 with a degree in journalism. In 2016, he was a recipient of The...