Judith Ressler
Judith Ressler talks about the ineffective air-conditioning unit she had to buy because the Brattleboro Housing Partnership banned in-window units. Photo by Kristopher Radder/Brattleboro Reformer

This story by Bob Audette was published by the Brattleboro Reformer on July 20.

[B]RATTLEBORO โ€” The outside temperature has dropped significantly in the last two weeks, but itโ€™s still hot in the Samuel Elliot High Rise, and itโ€™s not just a thermometer reading.

โ€œI have lived here for 15 years and for 14 of those years I have had an in-window air-conditioning unit,โ€ said Judith Ressler.

Recently, the Brattleboro Housing Partnership, which owns and manages the 62-unit apartment building on Elliot Street, removed the in-window units.

โ€œThey want us to get floor models,โ€ said Ressler.

โ€œItโ€™s unfair,โ€ said Elizabeth Snyder, who has collected a petition with 34 signatures requesting the return of their in-window units. โ€œWe had a meeting eight months ago and we were told floor units cost $100 but theyโ€™re anywhere between $260 and $450 each.โ€

Snyder and Ressler said they were told the reason the units had to be removed was because they were dripping and causing damage to lower apartments. They were also told they had no choice when maintenance workers came around and removed the in-window units.

โ€œThey didnโ€™t give usย a choice,โ€ said Snyder. Residents were also told BHP would charge $20 to install the ductwork for the floor AC unit models, she said.

โ€œThe old units leaked because they werenโ€™t put in properly,โ€ said Snyder, adding she wouldnโ€™t mind paying $20 to re-install her in-window unit because โ€œIt moves the air around better than a floor model. Those donโ€™t do the job.โ€

โ€œWe are the elderly, the disabled, the poor and the retired,โ€ said Ressler. โ€œWe donโ€™t have the money to buy floor models.โ€

Ressler said during the heat wave that saw temperatures approaching 100 degrees, some non-air-conditioned rooms reached 95 degrees.

Elizabeth Snyder gathers signatures on a petition
Glenn LaRose signs a petition distributed by Elizabeth Snyder, president of the building association, to residents to have their window AC units restored. Photo by Kristopher Radder/Brattleboro Reformer

Affordable floor models, she said, can only cool one room, such as a small bedroom, and you canโ€™t expect someone to seal themselves off in one room all day while temperatures outside are soaring.

Chris Hart, the executive director of BHP, said tenants have known about the proposed change since the first public discussion last September.

โ€œWe canโ€™t have the window units in because they donโ€™t fit the windows we have here,โ€ said Hart.

Jack Mahoney, BHPโ€™s portfolio manager said an in-window unit requires a double-hung window with an upper sash to hold it in place.

โ€œBecause we donโ€™t have those types of windows you get into rigging a support system and we didnโ€™t want that at all,โ€ said Mahoney.

Dripping condensation from the in-window units caused significant and expensive repairs, especially to lower balconies, he said, as well as rot and mildew to wood exteriors.

But that wasnโ€™t the only reason the units had to come out, said Hart.

โ€œAs we explored this issue, one of our big concerns was that one of these units was going to fall out and hurt somebody below,โ€ she said.

Hart said tenants had plenty of time to save up money to purchase floor models.

โ€œWe gave an awful lot of notice and we had multiple meetings with residents at all of our places, including the high rise,โ€ she said. โ€œItโ€™s in the new handbook that everyone got ahead of time. We also had a very lengthy hearing with the board of commissioners before it adopted the new handbook. There was a lot discussion around the changes. We thought we had given them ample time to save up and buy the appliances.โ€

She said the board voted on the changes in November and they went into effect in January. She also admitted that she had suggested the units were cheaper than they really are, but she corrected that suggestion.

โ€œWe understand that people are unhappy, but we have had damage done to our buildings as a result of having the wrong units poorly installed in the wrong windows,โ€ said Hart.

Mahoney said the $20 installation fee doesnโ€™t cover all the costs involved in installing the duct work for the floor models, but BHP is covering the excess.

โ€œThis is a one-time cost,โ€ he said.

Electric bills may change, too, said Hart. People are billed according to the types of appliances they have in their apartments.

โ€œWe are being more than fair about this,โ€ said Mahoney. โ€œWe only include five or six hours a day in the calculation. We are not charging them for 24 hours of use.โ€

Hart said there is also a community room with air conditioning available to all residents and BHP is looking at installing air conditioning in community rooms on each floor.

โ€œThe other point is the high rise was built in 1982,โ€ said Hart. โ€œItโ€™s an old building and it does not have central air. It would be next to impossible to install central air.โ€

Ressler and Snyder said they arenโ€™t ready to give up the fight to get their old air conditioners back. They have contacted Vermont Legal Aid for assistance.

โ€œWe are asking BHP to provide reasonable accommodations,โ€ said Ressler. โ€œAll we want to be able to do is put our window AC units back in so we can enjoy our whole apartments.โ€

Rachel Batterson, the director of Vermont Legal Aidโ€™s Housing Discrimination Law Project, said the tenants at Samuel Elliot might have a case against their landlord, and then again, they may not.

โ€œThere are two different areas of law that might cover this problem,โ€ she said. โ€œBut we are in the process of looking at the specific regulations that govern this particular property. In some cases, housing providers have to provide reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities or people who have an impairment that limits a person in one or more major life activities, such as thinking, breathing or eating. The duty to accommodate is fairly broad.โ€

However, noted Batterson, โ€œA floor unit could be seen as a reasonable accommodation. It certainly sounds as if BHP has a reasonable reason for not wanting window units. The question is, is there another accommodation.โ€

Another factor to be considered when determining a reasonable accommodation is whether it poses an unfair financial burden, noted Batterson.

โ€œTo accommodate a personโ€™s disability, it has to be done in the least expensive, least burdensome way,โ€ she said. This week, with outside temperatures not so extreme, tenants at the high rise are not suffering like two weeks ago, but, said Ressler, itโ€™s bound to get hot again, and soon.

โ€œWe need to breathe cool air for health reasons,โ€ she said. โ€œWe canโ€™t deal with these floor models. We want our AC units back.โ€

ย