Business & Economy

Nearly $550,000 in broadband grants will serve 307 addresses

The Public Service Department will give more than a half-million dollars to three companies to upgrade internet speeds in rural areas of Vermont.

The department this week announced the $547,500 in grants to Comcast, Consolidated Communications (formerly FairPoint) and ECFiber to upgrade speeds at 307 homes and businesses.

The grants are part of the Connectivity Initiative, a program the Legislature started in 2015 to reduce the number of Vermonters without high-speed internet. The program is funded through a surcharge on Vermont’s universal service fee on phone bills.

Clay Purvis
Clay Purvis, the director of telecommunications and connectivity for the Public Service Department. Photo by Erin Mansfield/VTDigger
The money must be used to upgrade homes and businesses that have access to something slower than 4 megabits per second downloading and 1 Mbps uploading (written as 4/1 Mbps) to speeds of at least 10/1 Mbps.

The official definition of broadband at the Federal Communications Commission is 25/3 Mbps.

Clay Purvis, the director of telecommunications and connectivity for the Public Service Department, said most of the 307 homes and businesses that will be served by this round of grants will have access to speeds far greater than 10/1 Mbps.

Comcast will receive $300,000 to upgrade speeds at 114 addresses in Cavendish. The company offers speeds up to 1 gigabit per second both uploading and downloading, the equivalent of 1,000/1,000 Mbps.

ECFiber will receive $72,500 to run fiber-optic cable to 31 homes and businesses in Randolph, Royalton and Stockbridge. ECFiber currently offers speeds up to 400/400 Mbps.

Consolidated Communications will receive $175,000 to upgrade speeds at 162 addresses in Reading, Woodstock and Whitingham. The company has fiber-optic cable in the middle part of its network and then connects digital subscriber lines, or DSL, to people’s homes. Those lines offer slower speeds than fiber-optic cable, but will be at least 10/1 Mbps.

Purvis said the department received bids this year that were more competitive than bids in previous years and that the amount the department is paying companies for connections at each address is lower than in previous years.

“I think we’re getting better bids,” Purvis said. “These three providers submitted several different projects, so we primarily looked at projects on the cost-per-address basis.”

As part of this year’s grants, the department is planning to pay Comcast $2,632 per address, ECFiber $2,339 per address, and Consolidated $1,080 per address.

In 2015, the first year of the grant program, the state granted an average of $5,026 per address to the same three companies.

Whitingham is getting service in part because the town worked with Consolidated to get the company to upgrade speed, Purvis said. He said the company has “been working with a lot of towns in southern Vermont, and they put forward a pretty competitive proposal.”

Cavendish had been struggling for a long time to find an internet service provider for residents. Purvis said the town was able to identify three specific areas that needed service, and Comcast is upgrading speeds at 114 of the addresses in those areas.

“Cavendish went through every option,” Purvis said. “They talked to every provider that they could, and Comcast was the only provider that ended up submitting a proposal.”

Purvis said the state is making a dent in the number of Vermont households that don’t have access to high-speed internet, but there are still nearly 30,000 households that are considered underserved. He said it would be a long time before the state brings high-speed internet to everyone.

“These are incremental improvements,” Purvis said. “At current funding levels, I don’t foresee this program completely solving the problem in the near future. However, it does provide benefits to Vermonters.”

“Where towns can partner with broadband providers and identify discrete and doable projects, it does provide an immediate benefit to those towns,” he said. “And we’re starting to see that, where towns are starting to reach out to providers and say, ‘Hey, we want to do a connectivity project.’”

If you read us, please support us.

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer.

We moderate every comment. Please go to our FAQ for the full policy.

Erin Mansfield

Recent Stories

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Nearly $550,000 in broadband grants will serve 307 addresses"
  • Peter Chick

    1791.53 per seems expensive.

  • Mark Bowen

    What about the neglected NEK?

  • Stephen Whitaker

    Re: Comcast: “The company offers speeds up to 1 gigabit per second both
    uploading and downloading, the equivalent of 1,000/1,000 Mbps.”

    This is simply incorrect, and by a long shot.
    A vague claim by a company representative not fact checked or a gross misunderstanding.

    The 1000Mbps service that Comcast has begun deploying in places like Boston, (not Vermont) using DOCSIS 3.1 modems, is limited to a 35 Mbps upload speed and thus does not meet the Vermont statutory goal of 100/100 by 2024. If the company was referring the fiber to the premises that they build only on a custom basis at very high cost to select business customers, that is not what Comcast is proposing to build in Cavendish.

    Comcast will in effect be using the $300k in corporate welfare to build a small portion of the 550 miles of new coax service that are required to built anyway under the terms of their renewed CPG and will use the spare $300k as legal fees to sue Vermont in federal court to attempt to shed their “public benefit” obligations attached to the new CPG.

  • Edward Letourneau

    Where did the PSD get the $550K they are handing out? — Is it from the fees they add to our phone bills?

  • bryanalexander

    Incremental progress, but progress.