Sequester hits Vermont Guard, Head Start

While many of Dubie’s family members as well as local and national politicians crowded into the ceremony, it was clear that the guard would miss Dubie too.

Vermont Guard members attend the retirement ceremony for Brian Dubie in August 2012. Photo by Taylor Dobbs/VTDigger

The state’s toddlers and military technicians don’t often have much in common, but both are victims of the same budget cuts that came as a consequence of the federal budget sequester.

Nationally, there’s been a sigh of relief among many federal programs where cuts turned out to be less severe than originally anticipated. A Washington Post story published Monday revealed that only 11 of the 48 “dire predictions” made by the Obama administration have come to fruition.

But two of the programs that haven’t been spared in this state — the Vermont National Guard and Head Start, a federally funded child development program — are feeling the impacts of the cuts acutely. Starting Monday, roughly 500 military technicians in the Vermont National Guard will be put on furlough. Meanwhile, Head Start programs across the state have had to shed staff, put children on wait lists and prematurely shut their doors for the summer.

Guard maintenance deferred

The furlough, which is split 50-50 between technicians in the Air Guard and the Army Guard, will take place from July 8 to Sept 30. The reduction in work time represents a budget cut of $2 million for the Vermont National Guard. Technicians won’t come to work on Mondays, which means they will lose a total of 11 days of work and 20 percent of their paychecks during that period.

Summer is peak training time for the Guard, and Adjutant Gen. Steven Cray says the timing for furlough “couldn’t have been worse” in that regard. The Guard will have to fly fewer aircraft during training sessions and use less equipment as maintenance needs are deferred.

But Guard operations in general won’t have to be scaled back, according to Cray, and the brunt of the impact will be felt by families.

“It’s mostly a hardship for the families. They are going to feel most of the stress,” he said.

If the furlough extends beyond September — a question contingent on what happens in Congress — the 4,000-member Vermont National Guard would start to see a more significant impact on its maintenance and training operations, Cray said.

Hampering Head Start

The state’s Head Start programs are also waiting with bated breath, hoping Congress can reach an agreement on the 2014 budget that would stop, or at least mitigate, future spending cuts.

Head Start provides early education and wraparound health services for low-income children up to age 5 and social services, such as mental health, substance abuse, and domestic violence counseling, for families.

Vermont has seven Head Start programs and four Early Head Start programs, which offer services to pregnant women and toddlers. They are grappling with an $800,000 cut that was made across the board in proportion to their individual budgets.

Statewide, Head Start enrolled 150 fewer children in 2013 and laid off 22 staff members as a result of the sequester. Programs have also had to scale back a number of positions — teachers, home visitors, supervisors, and managers — without eliminating them entirely. Some centers, particularly those in the northwestern part of the state, have had to shut down operations several weeks early to save money.

Several programs that collaborate with local child care centers, providing health services and family services to their children, have had to sever those agreements.

Paul Behrman, director of the Champlain Valley Head Start and chair of the Vermont Head Start Association, said the sequester has hit some of the most vulnerable families in Vermont.

“These cuts are devastating for kids and families and communities,” he said. “In many cases, this is the program that is serving some of those most vulnerable kids and families, providing some of those most critical services.”

Head Start served about 1,600 children in the state, prior to sequestration, but Behrman estimates that’s only about half of the eligible population. Paring back enrollment by 150 children puts them further from their goal of meeting the needs of low-income families. Head Start centers keep waiting lists and they prioritize the most needy families for acceptance.

The sudden onset of the cuts, which came mid-fiscal year had made it harder for programs to cope with them, Behrman said. “This cut was coming down the pike halfway into our funding cycle. You cannot spread that cut over an entire fiscal year when it’s coming midstream.”

Northeast Kingdom Community Action (NEKCA) runs the Head Start program in Orleans, Essex and Caledonia counties. Linda Michniewicz, the program’s director, said the cuts have been “devastating” in a region where child poverty levels typically outpace the rest of the state and child care centers are few and far between.

NEKCA lost $150,000, and, as a result, 17 children were bumped from the program. As part of the scaleback, NEKCA has also had to reduce personnel — instead of cutting staff, Michniewicz said they’ve instituted staggered temporary layoffs — and closed programs one or two weeks early.

“We cut here and there wherever we could. I think we got through this round by the skin of our teeth but who knows what’s coming next.”

Alicia Freese

Comment Policy requires that all commenters identify themselves by their authentic first and last names. Initials, pseudonyms or screen names are not permissible.

No personal harrassment, abuse, or hate speech is permitted. Be succinct and to the point. Comments should be 1000 characters or fewer. If your comment is over 500 words, consider sending a commentary instead.

We personally review and moderate every comment that is posted here. This takes a lot of time; please consider donating to keep the conversation productive and informative.

The purpose of this policy is to encourage a civil discourse among readers who are willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. VTDigger has created a safe zone for readers who wish to engage in a thoughtful discussion on a range of subjects. We hope you join the conversation. If you have questions or concerns about our commenting platform, please review our Commenting FAQ.

Privacy policy
  • Dan Carver

    I know there are political motivations as to where cuts are made, regardless of party. A more courageous stance would be the elimination of mid-level bureaucrats–deputy cheifs, assistant supervisors i.e.the folks between the leaders and the service providers–and keep the service providers,or direct the funds to the folks we are supposed to be helping. If the leaders were strong, they would not need so many non-value added layers.

  • Jim Barrett

    This is total BS when our wonderful leader is spending 100 million for a trip back home to Africa. The obama’s love those million dollar parties while home while his brother lives in Kenya for 20 bucks a month. No wonder this country is messed up. Our troops in Afganistan are now being denied hot meals while the commander in Chief lives like a KING!

Thanks for reporting an error with the story, "Sequester hits Vermont Guard, Head Start"